dolf
2017-05-02 08:09:05 UTC
-- UNDERSTANDING THE END OF RELIGIOUS BELIEF WHICH IS DERIVED FROM
PYTHAGOREAN [BABYLONIAN] HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER
(c) 2016 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 2 May, 2017
*THIS* *IS* *ONLY *A* *SECOND* *PRELIMINARY* *DRAFT*
THERE IS SOME CONSIDERABLE TRANSCENDENTAL CONSCIOUSNESS WHICH I MUST
ENGAGE IN BEFORE I CAN ANSWER THE DIABOLICAL ACCUSATIONS MADE BY THE
ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH A SWAR CRIMES AND I HAVE NO INTENTION OF SHOWING
ANY GRACE IN RETURN AS I INTENTIONED TO SLAUGHTER YOUR HOPE FOR ETERNITY
WITHOUT COMPULSION OF CONSCIENCE.
*I* *AM* *HOPING* *TO* *DO* *TO* *YOU* *WHAT* *YOU* *HAVE* *DONE* *TO* *ME*.
TETRAD - #2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {BETH (DOUBLE - #1 - NATURE
CONTAINS NATURE {#4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE}) / CHERUBIM (Gk.
Cheroubim - a cherub or imaginary figures which covered the mercy seat
to the Ark of the Covenant [Exodus 25:17-22] and from where God communed
with Israel)}
#1 - MONAD (MATTER as World of Emanation - ATZILUTH) as 3 MOTHER LETTERS
expressing by logical syllogism the following meta-principles as TRIAD
prototypes:
#2 - DUAD (FORM as World of Creation - BRIYAH) as 7 DOUBLE expressing
the essential meta-principles as the SEPTET prototypes:
#3 - TRIAD (POTENCY as World of Formation - YETZIRAH) as 12 SINGLE
LETTERS expressing the essential meta-principles as the 4 quadrant
prototypes:
#4 - TETRAD (ACTUALITY as World of Action - ASSIYAH)
{ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA {#1 + #2 + #3 + #4 = #10}
For an explanation of this, I will have recourse to to Sefer Yetzirah as
Introductory Sections 1:5; 1:6; 1:7 [pages 44 to 62] and commentary upon
Eternity and Boundaries of the Universe with Sections 5:2 and 5:3 [pages
204 to 209]
SECTION 1:5
Ten Sefirot of Nothingness:
Their measure is ten
which have no end
A depth of beginning
A depth of end
A depth of good
A depth of evil
A depth of above
A depth of below
A depth of east
A depth of west
A depth of north
A depth of south
The singular Master
God faithful King
dominates over them all
from His holy dwelling
until eternity of eternities.
SECTION 1:6
Ten Sefirot of Nothingness
Their vision is like the “appearance of lightning”
Their limit has no end
And His Word in them is “running and returning”
They rush to His saying like a whirlwind
Ana’ before His throne they prostrate themselves.
SECTION 1:7
Ten Sefirot of Nothingness
Their end is imbedded in their beginning
and their beginning in their end
like a flame in a burning coal
For the Master is singular
He has no second
And before One, what do you count?
SECTION 5:2
Twelve Elementals
HVZ ChTY LNS OTZQ (#100 + #90 + #70 = #260; #60 + #50 + #30 = #140; #10
+ #9 + #8 =#27; #7 + #6 +#5 = #18)
Their foundation is the twelve diagonal boundaries:
The east upper boundary
The east northern boundary
The east lower boundary
The south upper boundary
The south eastern boundary
The south “lower boundary
The west upper boundary
The west southern boundary
The west lower boundary
The north upper boundary
The north western boundary
The north lower boundary
They extend continually until eternity of eternities
And it is they that are the boundaries of the Universe.
SECTION 5:3
Twelve Elementals
HVZ ChTY LNS OTZQ (#100 + #90 + #70 = #260; #60 + #50 + #30 = #140; #10
+ #9 + #8 =#27; #7 + #6 +#5 = #18)
Their foundation is [that]
He engraved them, carved them, permuted them,
weighed them, and transformed them,
And with them He formed
twelve constellations in the Universe
twelve months in the Year
and twelve directors in the Soul,
male and female.
*** TO BE CONTINUED
ABC NEWS () @ 0947 ON 2 MAY 2017: "SEVERE TURBULENCE LEAVES 27 AEROFLOT
PASSENGERS INJURED, SOME NEEDING SURGERY:
Twenty-seven passengers have been injured, some breaking bones, after an
Aeroflot flight from Moscow to Bangkok experienced violent and
unexpected turbulence.
It was a bumpy ride for the 313 passengers travelling on board Aeroflot
flight SU 270 with video footage showing people lying in the planes
aisles surrounded by food packets and other items.
One passenger, Rostik Rusev, shared the video of social media shortly
after the flight.
He said he the turbulence was "throwing people around like crazy".
"Blood everywhere, people with broken bones, noses, open fractures,
babies with head injuries," he said.
Another passenger, Margarita Vladimir, echoed the scenes.
"We saw so many people getting seriously hurt. There were broken legs,
arms, bruised faces," Ms Vladimir told CNN.
Fifteen Russian citizens and two Thai citizens remain in hospital and
three people required surgery, according to Aeroflot.
No-one sustained life-threatening injuries.
The Russian Embassy in Bangkok said those injured had not been wearing
seat belts.
Turbulence 'impossible' to predict
The airline said the incident was "impossible to foresee".
Known as "clear-air turbulence", it can occur without any clouds and a
weather radar is unable to alert of its approach, meaning crew are
unable to warn passengers, Aeroflot said.
The airline said it will cover all costs, including medical treatment."
-
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-05-02/severe-turbulence-leaves-27-aeroflot-passengers-injured/8488350
Nous: #80
Time:
Date: 2017.11.2
Torah: #10 #30 #10 %81 = #50
Dao: Primitivist Independence, Remaining in Isolation
Tetra: #23 - Ease
I-Ching: H16 - Contentment, Enthusiasm, Providing-For, Excess
Latin: Clemens {Helpful God} Alt: Daniel {Judgement of God} {
1. GIVES PALM OF VICTORY FOR THOSE WHO ARE UNJUSTLY ATTACKED OR INVADED.
INSPIRES PASSION BETWEEN SEXES & ENSURES MARITAL FIDELITY
2. CONTROLS DESTINY OF KINGS & HIGH DIGNITARIES
3. ALL GENERATIONS
4. Asican
}
Seth {Substituted, Compensated; That God has heard my prayer and has
delivered me out of affliction. Power & Strength; put; who puts; fixed}
- http://www.grapple369.com?zen:5,row:6,col:6,nous:80
***@zen: 5, row: 6, col: 6, nous: 80 [Super: #260 / #10 -
Impossible Advice, What can Be Done?; I-Ching: H30 - Cohesion, Radiance,
Clinging to Brightness/Fire, The net; Tetra: 41 - Response, Ego: #419 /
#80 - Primitivist Independence, Remaining in Isolation; I-Ching: H16 -
Contentment, Enthusiasm, Providing-For, Excess; Tetra: 23 - Ease]
SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #260 {#81, #81, #81, #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 -
Marriageable Maid/Maiden, Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - Inner} has
34 Categories: #6, #1, #200, #3, #10, #40 = 'arag (H707): 1) to weave;
1a) (Qal); 1a1) to weave (cloth); 1a2) to braid (Samson's hair); 1a3)
weaver (subst.); 1a4) intrigue (fig.); #2, #1, #200, #7, #10, #40 =
'araz (H729): 1) to be firm; 2) made firm (past part.) (BDB/TWOT) adj;
3) firm, strong; #30, #2, #8, #10, #200, #10 = bachiyr (H972): 1)
chosen, choice one, chosen one, elect (of God); #40, #3, #2, #10, #200,
#5 = gebiyrah (H1377): 1) queen, lady; 2) queen-mother; #3, #200, #7,
#10, #40 = Geriziym (H1630): 1) a mountain in northern Israel in Ephraim
near Shechem from which the blessings were read to the Israelites on
entering Canaan; site of the Samaritan temple built after the captivity;
#4, #6, #200, #10, #40 = dowr (H1755): 1) period, generation,
habitation, dwelling; 1a) period, age, generation (period of time); 1b)
generation (those living during a period); 1c) generation (characterised
by quality, condition, class of men); 1d) dwelling-place, habitation;
#6, #8, #6, #200, #40 = Chuwram (H2361): 1) son of Bela and grandson of
Benjamin; 2) king of Tyre allied with David and Solomon; alternate
spelling for 'Hiram'; 3) a chief architect of Solomon's temple;
alternate spelling for 'Hiram'; #40, #9, #5, #200, #6 = tohar (H2892):
1) purity, purification, purifying; 2) clearness, lustre; 1a) purity;
1b) purifying; #10, #200, #40, #10 = Yeremay (H3413): 1) a descendant of
Hashum who took a foreign wife in the time of Ezra and was compelled to
put her away; #30, #20, #200, #10 = kariy (H3746): 1) a group of foreign
mercenary soldiers serving as a bodyguard for king David; also
executioners; #30, #90, #90, #10, #40 = latsats (H3945): 1) (Qal) to
scorn, make mouths at, talk arrogantly; #5, #40, #4, #6, #200, #5 =
meduwrah (H4071): 1) pile (of fuel), pyre, pile (of wood); #6, #2, #40,
#7, #200, #5 = mizreh (H4214): 1) pitchfork; #20, #40, #200 = mar
(H4752): 1) a drop, a flowing down; #40, #200, #20 = morek (H4816): 1)
weakness; #50, #5, #200, #5 = nehar (Aramaic) (H5103): 1) river; #50,
#70, #40, #50, #10, #40 = na`aman (H5282): 1) pleasantness; #60, #70,
#80, #10, #40 = ce`eph (H5588): 1) ambivalent, divided, half-hearted;
#70, #50, #80, #20, #40 = `anaph (H6057): 1) bough, branch; #30, #80,
#60, #10, #30, #10, #40 = peciyl (H6456): 1) image, idol, graven image;
#6, #90, #4, #10, #100, #10, #40 = tsaddiyq (H6662): 1) just, lawful,
righteous; 1a) just, righteous (in government); 1b) just, right (in
one's cause); 1c) just, righteous (in conduct and character); 1d)
righteous (as justified and vindicated by God); 1e) right, correct,
lawful; #6, #40, #90, #4, #10, #100, #10 = tsadaq (H6663): 1) to be
just, be righteous; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to have a just cause, be in the
right; 1a2) to be justified; 1a3) to be just (of God); 1a4) to be just,
be righteous (in conduct and character); 1b) (Niphal) to be put or made
right, be justified; 1c) (Piel) justify, make to appear righteous, make
someone righteous; 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1) to do or bring justice (in
administering law); 1d2) to declare righteous, justify; 1d3) to justify,
vindicate the cause of, save; 1d4) to make righteous, turn to
righteousness; 1e) (Hithpael) to justify oneself; #40, #90, #80, #10,
#40 = tsaphah (H6823): 1) to lay out, lay over, overlay, cover; 1a)
(Piel) to overlay, plate, stud; 1b) (Pual) to be laid over; #200, #4,
#50, #6 = ruwd (H7300): 1) to wander restlessly, roam; 1a) (Qal) to
roam; 1b) (Hiphil) to be restless, show restlessness; #50, #200, #8, #2
= rachab (H7337): 1) to be or grow wide, be or grow large; 1a) (Qal) to
be widened, be enlarged; 1b) (Niphal) broad or roomy pasture
(participle); 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to make large; 1c2) to enlarge; #200,
#8, #2, #50 = rochab (H7341): 1) breadth, width, expanse; #6, #200, #8,
#6, #40 = rachuwm (H7349): 1) compassionate; 1a) always of God with one
possible exception; #200, #20, #10, #30 = rakiyl (H7400): 1) slander,
slanderer, tale bearer, informer; #5, #200, #50, #5 = rinnah (H7440): 1)
ringing cry; 1a) of entreaty, supplication; 1b) in proclamation, joy,
praise; #4, #5, #10, #30, #10, #1, #200 = deilia (G1167): 1) timidity,
fearfulness, cowardice For Synonyms see entry 5835; #4, #10, #1, #4, #5,
#60, #1, #40, #5, #50, #70, #10 = diadechomai (G1237): 1) to receive
through another, anything left or bequeathed by him, to receive in
succession, receive in turn, succeed to; #4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #8,
#200 = diatheke (G1242): 1) a disposition, arrangement, of any sort,
which one wishes to be valid, the last disposition which one makes of
his earthly possessions after his death, a testament or will; 2) a
compact, a covenant, a testament; 2a) God's covenant with Noah, etc.;
#20, #1, #9, #10, #5, #40, #5, #50, #70, #50 = kathiemi (G2524): 1) to
send down, to let down; #20, #100, #1, #10, #80, #1, #30, #8, #10 =
kraipale (G2897): 1) the giddiness and headache caused by drinking wine
to excess;
Nous: #34
Time: 04:00 hrs
Date: 2017.5.21
Torah: #30 #30 #5 %81 = #65
Dao: Great Guide, Trust in its Perfection
Tetra: #27 - Duties
I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on
what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch
Latin: Regnator {Praiseworthy God} Alt: Niathel {Wail at the Portent of
God} {
1. SERVES TO ACQUIRE 'LIGHT', CURE CONTAGIOUS DISEASES
2. LOVE, ART, SCIENCE & FORTUNE
3. THE SCIENCES
4. Asentacer
}
Jared {Descent/A ruling; commanding; coming down}
- http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:2,col:7,nous:34
***@zen: 1, row: 2, col: 7, nous: 34 [Super: #453 / #34 - Great
Guide, Trust in its Perfection; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured,
Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has been spoiled (decay),
Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 27 - Duties, Ego: #298 / #34 - Great Guide,
Trust in its Perfection; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting
Decay, Correcting, Work on what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying,
Branch; Tetra: 27 - Duties]
SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #140 {#81, #59 - A Sensible Guide, Hold Fast To
Reason; I-Ching: H42 - Increase, Augmenting; Tetra: 13 - Increase} has
126 Categories: #80, #50, #10 = paniym (H6440): 1) face; 1a) face,
faces; 1b) presence, person; 1c) face (of seraphim or cherubim); 1d)
face (of animals); 1e) face, surface (of ground); 1f) as adv of
loc/temp; 1f1) before and behind, toward, in front of, forward,
formerly, from beforetime, before; 1g) with; 1g1) in front of, before,
to the front of, in the presence of, in the face of, at the face or
front of, from the presence of, from before, from before the face of;
#40, #70, #30 = `al (H5921): 1) upon, on the ground of, according to, on
account of, on behalf of, concerning, beside, in addition to, together
with, beyond, above, over, by, on to, towards, to, against; 2) because
that, because, notwithstanding, although; 1a) upon, on the ground of, on
the basis of, on account of, because of, therefore, on behalf of, for
the sake of, for, with, in spite of, notwithstanding, concerning, in the
matter of, as regards; 1b) above, beyond, over (of excess); 1c) above,
over (of elevation or pre-eminence); 1d) upon, to, over to, unto, in
addition to, together with, with (of addition); 1e) over (of suspension
or extension); 1f) by, adjoining, next, at, over, around (of contiguity
or proximity); 1g) down upon, upon, on, from, up upon, up to,, towards,
over towards, to, against (with verbs of motion); 1h) to (as a dative)
conj; #70, #10, #50, #10 = `ayin (H5869): 1) eye; 2) spring, fountain;
1a) eye; 1a1) of physical eye; 1a2) as showing mental qualities; 1a3) of
mental and spiritual faculties (fig.); #40, #40, #50, #10 = min (H4480):
1) from, out of, on account of, off, on the side of, since, above, than,
so that not, more than; 2) that; 1a) from (expressing separation), off,
on the side of; 1b) out of; 1b1) (with verbs of proceeding, removing,
expelling); 1b2) (of material from which something is made); 1b3) (of
source or origin); 1c) out of, some of, from (partitively); 1d) from,
since, after (of time); 1e) than, more than (in comparison); 1f)
from...even to, both...and, either...or; 1g) than, more than, too much
for (in comparisons); 1h) from, on account of, through, because (with
infinitive) conj; #5, #70, #10, #50, #5 = `ayin (H5869): 1) eye; 2)
spring, fountain; 1a) eye; 1a1) of physical eye; 1a2) as showing mental
qualities; 1a3) of mental and spiritual faculties (fig.); #10, #4, #70,
#50, #6 = yada` (H3045): 1) to know; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to know; 1a1a) to
know, learn to know; 1a1b) to perceive; 1a1c) to perceive and see, find
out and discern; 1a1d) to discriminate, distinguish; 1a1e) to know by
experience; 1a1f) to recognise, admit, acknowledge, confess; 1a1g) to
consider; 1a2) to know, be acquainted with; 1a3) to know (a person
carnally); 1a4) to know how, be skilful in; 1a5) to have knowledge, be
wise; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be made known, be or become known, be
revealed; 1b2) to make oneself known; 1b3) to be perceived; 1b4) to be
instructed; 1c) (Piel) to cause to know; 1d) (Poal) to cause to know;
1e) (Pual); 1e1) to be known; 1e2) known, one known, acquaintance
(participle); 1f) (Hiphil) to make known, declare; 1g) (Hophal) to be
made known; 1h) (Hithpael) to make oneself known, reveal oneself; #70,
#50, #10, #10 = `oniy (H6040): 1) affliction, poverty, misery; 1a)
affliction; 1b) poverty; #40, #40, #10, #40, #10 = mayim (H4325): 1)
water, waters; 1a) water; 1b) water of the feet, urine; 1c) of danger,
violence, transitory things, refreshment (fig.); #5, #100, #5, #30 =
qahal (H6951): 1) assembly, company, congregation, convocation; 1a)
assembly; 1a1) for evil counsel, war or invasion, religious purposes;
1b) company (of returning exiles); 1c) congregation; 1c1) as organised
body; #5, #10, #70, #50, #5 = ya`anah (H3284): 1) an unclean bird; 1a)
owl, ostrich, literally translated as 'daughters of the owl'; 1b)
perhaps an extinct bird, exact meaning unknown; #6, #8, #30, #90, #6 =
chalats (H2502): 1) to remove, draw out, draw off, take off, withdraw,
equip (for war), arm for war, rescue, be rescued; 2) to draw off or out,
withdraw; 1a) (Qal) equipped (participle); 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be
equipped; 1b2) to go equipped; 1b3) to be armed; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to
make strong, brace up; 1c2) to invigorate; 2a) (Qal); 2a1) to draw, draw
off; 2a2) to withdraw; 2b) (Niphal); 2b1) to be delivered; 2b2) to be
saved; 2c) (Piel); 2c1) to pull out, tear out; 2c2) to rescue, deliver,
set free; 2c3) to take away, plunder; #70, #40, #30 = `amal (H5999): 1)
toil, trouble, labour; 1a) trouble; 1b) trouble, mischief; 1c) toil,
labour; #30, #50, #60 = nec (H5251): 1) something lifted up, standard,
signal, signal pole, ensign, banner, sign, sail; 1a) standard (as
rallying point), signal; 1b) standard (pole); 1c) ensign, signal; #5,
#40, #40, #30, #20, #5 = mamlakah (H4467): 1) kingdom, dominion, reign,
sovereignty; 1a) kingdom, realm; 1b) sovereignty, dominion; 1c) reign;
#70, #6, #4, #50, #10 = `owd (H5750): 1) a going round, continuance adv;
2) still, yet, again, besides; 2a) still, yet (of continuance or
persistence); 2b) still, yet, more (of addition or repetition); 2c)
again; 2d) still, moreover, besides; #5, #80, #50, #5 = panah (H6437):
1) to turn; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to turn toward or from or away; 1a2) to turn
and do; 1a3) to turn, decline (of day); 1a4) to turn toward, approach
(of evening); 1a5) to turn and look, look, look back or at or after or
for; 1b) (Piel) to turn away, put out of the way, make clear, clear
away; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to turn; 1c2) to make a turn, show signs of
turning, turn back; 1d) (Hophal) to be turned back; #10, #30, #100 =
laqaq (H3952): 1) to lap, lick, lap up; 1a) (Qal) to lap, lap up; 1b)
(Piel) to lap up; #6, #90, #40, #4 = tsemed (H6776): 1) couple, pair,
team, yoke; 1a) couple, pair, span (usually of animals); 1b) acre; 1b1)
the amount of land a span of oxen could plow in one day; #100, #30, #10
= qaliy (H7039): 1) parched grain, roasted grain; 1a) a common food;
#30, #70, #30, #10 = `Eliy (H5941): 1) descendant of Aaron through
Ithamar and high priest and judge of Israel when Samuel entered service
as a child; #10, #100, #30 = qalal (H7043): 1) to be slight, be swift,
be trifling, be of little account, be light; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be
slight, be abated (of water); 1a2) to be swift; 1a3) to be trifling, be
of little account; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be swift, show oneself swift;
1b2) to appear trifling, be too trifling, be insignificant; 1b3) to be
lightly esteemed; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to make despicable; 1c2) to curse;
1d) (Pual) to be cursed; 1e) (Hiphil); 1e1) to make light, lighten; 1e2)
to treat with contempt, bring contempt or dishonour; 1f) (Pilpel); 1f1)
to shake; 1f2) to whet; 1g) (Hithpalpel) to shake oneself, be moved to
and fro; #40, #90, #4, #6 = tsad (H6654): 1) side; #6, #90, #30, #8, #6
= tsalach (H6743): 1) (Qal) to rush; 2) to advance, prosper, make
progress, succeed, be profitable; 2a) (Qal) to prosper; 2b) (Hiphil);
2b1) to make prosperous, bring to successful issue, cause to prosper;
2b2) to show or experience prosperity, prosper; #5, #40, #60, #30, #5 =
mecillah (H4546): 1) highway, raised way, public road; #70, #4, #10,
#50, #6 = `adiynow (H5722): 1) one of David's mighty warriors; #30, #20,
#30, #5, #50, #5 = kol (H3605): 1) all, the whole; 1a) all, the whole
of; 1b) any, each, every, anything; 1c) totality, everything; #6, #5,
#50, #40, #30, #9 = malat (H4422): 1) to slip away, escape, deliver,
save, be delivered; 1a) (Niphal); 1a1) to slip away; 1a2) to escape;
1a3) to be delivered; 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to lay, let slip out (of eggs);
1b2) to let escape; 1b3) to deliver, save (life); 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to
give birth to; 1c2) to deliver; 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1) to slip forth, slip
out, escape; 1d2) to escape; #20, #70, #40, #10 = `am (H5971): 1)
nation, people; 2) kinsman, kindred; 1a) people, nation; 1b) persons,
members of one's people, compatriots, country-men; #2, #8, #30, #100 =
cheleq (H2506): 1) portion, share, part, territory; 2) smoothness,
seductiveness, flattery; 1a) portion, share; 1b) portion, tract, parcel
(of land); 1c) one's portion, one's possession; 1d) (chosen) portion;
1e) portion, award (from God); #40, #8, #90, #2 = machtseb (H4274): 1)
hewing, hewn; 1a) of stones; #10, #90, #10, #30 = natsal (H5337): 1) to
snatch away, deliver, rescue, save, strip, plunder; 1a) (Niphal); 1a1)
to tear oneself away, deliver oneself; 1a2) to be torn out or away, be
delivered; 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to strip off, spoil; 1b2) to deliver; 1c)
(Hiphil); 1c1) to take away, snatch away; 1c2) to rescue, recover; 1c3)
to deliver (from enemies or troubles or death); 1c4) to deliver from sin
and guilt; 1d) (Hophal) to be plucked out; 1e) (Hithpael) to strip
oneself; #5, #50, #10, #70, #5 = nuwa` (H5128): 1) to quiver, totter,
shake, reel, stagger, wander, move, sift, make move, wave, waver,
tremble; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to wave, quiver, vibrate, swing, stagger,
tremble, be unstable; 1a2) to totter, go tottering; 1a2a) vagabond
(participle); 1b) (Niphal) to be tossed about or around; 1c) (Hiphil);
1c1) to toss about; 1c2) to shake, cause to totter; 1c3) to shake,
disturb; 1c4) to cause to wander; #6, #80, #30, #10, #9, #5 = peleytah
(H6413): 1) escape, deliverance; 1a) escape, deliverance; 1b) escaped
remnant; #6, #80, #30, #9, #10, #5 = Pelatyah (H6410): 1) son of
Hananiah and grandson of Zerubbabel; 2) a Simeonite in the days of king
Hezekiah of Judah who was one of the captains of 500 men who defeated
the Amalekites who had escaped; 3) one of the heads of the people who
sealed the covenant with Nehemiah; 4) son of Benaiah and one of the
princes of the people against whom Ezekiel was ordered to prophesy doom;
#20, #90, #30 = tsel (H6738): 1) shadow, shade; 1a) shadow (on dial);
1b) shadow, shade (as protection); 1c) shadow (symbolic of
transitoriness of life); #70, #7, #2, #50, #5, #6 = `azab (H5800): 1) to
leave, loose, forsake; 2) to restore, repair; 1a) (Qal) to leave; 1a1)
to depart from, leave behind, leave, let alone; 1a2) to leave, abandon,
forsake, neglect, apostatise; 1a3) to let loose, set free, let go, free;
1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be left to; 1b2) to be forsaken; 1c) (Pual) to be
deserted; 2a) (Qal) to repair; #5, #3, #2, #70, #50, #10 = Gib`oniy
(H1393): 1) an inhabitant of Gibeon; #6, #10, #70, #40, #10, #4 = `amad
(H5975): 1) to stand, remain, endure, take one's stand; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
to stand, take one's stand, be in a standing attitude, stand forth, take
a stand, present oneself, attend upon, be or become servant of; 1a2) to
stand still, stop (moving or doing), cease; 1a3) to tarry, delay,
remain, continue, abide, endure, persist, be steadfast; 1a4) to make a
stand, hold one's ground; 1a5) to stand upright, remain standing, stand
up, rise, be erect, be upright; 1a6) to arise, appear, come on the
scene, stand forth, appear, rise up or against; 1a7) to stand with, take
one's stand, be appointed, grow flat, grow insipid; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1)
to station, set; 1b2) to cause to stand firm, maintain; 1b3) to cause to
stand up, cause to set up, erect; 1b4) to present (one) before (king);
1b5) to appoint, ordain, establish; 1c) (Hophal) to be presented, be
caused to stand, be stood before; #80, #30, #30 = Palal (H6420): 1) son
of Uzai and one who assisted in restoring the walls of Jerusalem in the
time of Nehemiah; #100, #5, #30, #5 = qehillah (H6952): 1) assembly,
congregation; #6, #30, #50, #8, #40, #6 = nacham (H5162): 1) to be
sorry, console oneself, repent, regret, comfort, be comforted; 1a)
(Niphal); 1a1) to be sorry, be moved to pity, have compassion; 1a2) to
be sorry, rue, suffer grief, repent; 1a3) to comfort oneself, be
comforted; 1a4) to comfort oneself, ease oneself; 1b) (Piel) to comfort,
console; 1c) (Pual) to be comforted, be consoled; 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1)
to be sorry, have compassion; 1d2) to rue, repent of; 1d3) to comfort
oneself, be comforted; 1d4) to ease oneself; #6, #40, #10, #4, #70, #10
= yada` (H3045): 1) to know; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to know; 1a1a) to know,
learn to know; 1a1b) to perceive; 1a1c) to perceive and see, find out
and discern; 1a1d) to discriminate, distinguish; 1a1e) to know by
experience; 1a1f) to recognise, admit, acknowledge, confess; 1a1g) to
consider; 1a2) to know, be acquainted with; 1a3) to know (a person
carnally); 1a4) to know how, be skilful in; 1a5) to have knowledge, be
wise; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be made known, be or become known, be
revealed; 1b2) to make oneself known; 1b3) to be perceived; 1b4) to be
instructed; 1c) (Piel) to cause to know; 1d) (Poal) to cause to know;
1e) (Pual); 1e1) to be known; 1e2) known, one known, acquaintance
(participle); 1f) (Hiphil) to make known, declare; 1g) (Hophal) to be
made known; 1h) (Hithpael) to make oneself known, reveal oneself; #6,
#1, #8, #30, #90, #5 = chalats (H2502): 1) to remove, draw out, draw
off, take off, withdraw, equip (for war), arm for war, rescue, be
rescued; 2) to draw off or out, withdraw; 1a) (Qal) equipped
(participle); 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be equipped; 1b2) to go equipped;
1b3) to be armed; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to make strong, brace up; 1c2) to
invigorate; 2a) (Qal); 2a1) to draw, draw off; 2a2) to withdraw; 2b)
(Niphal); 2b1) to be delivered; 2b2) to be saved; 2c) (Piel); 2c1) to
pull out, tear out; 2c2) to rescue, deliver, set free; 2c3) to take
away, plunder; #10, #80, #30, #9, #5, #6 = palat (H6403): 1) to escape,
save, deliver, slip away; 1a) (Qal) to escape; 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to bring
into security, deliver; 1b2) to cause to escape, cast forth; 1b3) to be
delivered; 1b4) to slip away; 1c) (Hiphil) to bring into security, bring
to safety; #5, #90, #10, #30, #5 = natsal (H5337): 1) to snatch away,
deliver, rescue, save, strip, plunder; 1a) (Niphal); 1a1) to tear
oneself away, deliver oneself; 1a2) to be torn out or away, be
delivered; 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to strip off, spoil; 1b2) to deliver; 1c)
(Hiphil); 1c1) to take away, snatch away; 1c2) to rescue, recover; 1c3)
to deliver (from enemies or troubles or death); 1c4) to deliver from sin
and guilt; 1d) (Hophal) to be plucked out; 1e) (Hithpael) to strip
oneself; #6, #30, #40, #4, #50, #10 = lamad (H3925): 1) to learn. teach,
exercise in; 1a) (Qal) to learn; 1b) (Piel) to teach; 1c) (Pual) to be
taught, be trained; #10, #60, #70 = naca` (H5265): 1) to pull out, pull
up, set out, journey, remove, set forward, depart; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
pull out or up; 1a2) to set out, depart; 1a3) to journey, march; 1a4) to
set forth (of wind); 1b) (Niphal) to be pulled up, be removed, be
plucked up; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to cause to set out, lead out, cause to
spring up; 1c2) to remove, quarry; #1, #8, #30, #90, #5, #6 = chalats
(H2502): 1) to remove, draw out, draw off, take off, withdraw, equip
(for war), arm for war, rescue, be rescued; 2) to draw off or out,
withdraw; 1a) (Qal) equipped (participle); 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be
equipped; 1b2) to go equipped; 1b3) to be armed; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to
make strong, brace up; 1c2) to invigorate; 2a) (Qal); 2a1) to draw, draw
off; 2a2) to withdraw; 2b) (Niphal); 2b1) to be delivered; 2b2) to be
saved; 2c) (Piel); 2c1) to pull out, tear out; 2c2) to rescue, deliver,
set free; 2c3) to take away, plunder; #6, #10, #8, #30, #80, #6 =
chalaph (H2498): 1) to pass on or away, pass through, pass by, go
through, grow up, change, to go on from; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to pass on
quickly; 1a2) to pass away (vanish); 1a3) to come on anew, sprout again
(of grass); 1a4) to pass through; 1a5) to overstep, transgress; 1b)
(Piel) to cause to pass, change; 1c) (Hiph); 1c1) to change, substitute,
alter, change for better, renew; 1c2) to show newness (of tree); #70,
#30, #10, #20, #10 = `al (H5921): 1) upon, on the ground of, according
to, on account of, on behalf of, concerning, beside, in addition to,
together with, beyond, above, over, by, on to, towards, to, against; 2)
because that, because, notwithstanding, although; 1a) upon, on the
ground of, on the basis of, on account of, because of, therefore, on
behalf of, for the sake of, for, with, in spite of, notwithstanding,
concerning, in the matter of, as regards; 1b) above, beyond, over (of
excess); 1c) above, over (of elevation or pre-eminence); 1d) upon, to,
over to, unto, in addition to, together with, with (of addition); 1e)
over (of suspension or extension); 1f) by, adjoining, next, at, over,
around (of contiguity or proximity); 1g) down upon, upon, on, from, up
upon, up to,, towards, over towards, to, against (with verbs of motion);
1h) to (as a dative) conj; #10, #20, #50, #60 = kanac (H3664): 1) to
gather, collect, wrap; 1a) (Qal) to gather; 1b) (Piel) to gather; 1c)
(Hithpael) to gather together, wrap oneself up; #40, #90, #6, #4 =
matsowd (H4685): 1) siege-works, bulwark; 2) hunting implement, net n f;
3) net; 4) fastness, stronghold; #6, #60, #70, #4 = ca`ad (H5582): 1) to
support, sustain, stay, establish, strengthen, comfort; 1a) (Qal) to
support, sustain; 1a1) to sustain, stay (of heart); 1a2) to support,
uphold (of throne); #40, #100 = maq (H4716): 1) decay, rottenness; #20,
#10, #100, #6, #4 = yeqowd (H3350): 1) a burning; #6, #50, #30, #8, #40,
#6 = lacham (H3898): 1) to fight, do battle, make war; 2) (Qal) to eat,
use as food; 1a) (Qal) to fight, do battle; 1b) (Niphal) to engage in
battle, wage war; #5, #50, #6, #9, #70 = nata` (H5193): 1) to plant,
fasten, fix, establish; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to plant; 1a2) to plant,
establish (fig.); 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be planted; 1b2) to be
established (fig.); #5, #8, #7, #10, #100, #10 = chazaq (H2388): 1) to
strengthen, prevail, harden, be strong, become strong, be courageous, be
firm, grow firm, be resolute, be sore; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be strong,
grow strong; 1a1a) to prevail, prevail upon; 1a1b) to be firm, be caught
fast, be secure; 1a1c) to press, be urgent; 1a1d) to grow stout, grow
rigid, grow hard (bad sense); 1a1e) to be severe, be grievous; 1a2) to
strengthen; 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to make strong; 1b2) to restore to
strength, give strength; 1b3) to strengthen, sustain, encourage; 1b4) to
make strong, make bold, encourage; 1b5) to make firm; 1b6) to make
rigid, make hard; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to make strong, strengthen; 1c2) to
make firm; 1c3) to display strength; 1c4) to make severe; 1c5) to
support; 1c6) to repair; 1c7) to prevail, prevail upon; 1c8) to have or
take or keep hold of, retain, hold up, sustain, support; 1c9) to hold,
contain; 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1) to strengthen oneself; 1d2) to put forth
strength, use one's strength; 1d3) to withstand; 1d4) to hold strongly
with; #6, #50, #40, #30, #9, #5 = malat (H4422): 1) to slip away,
escape, deliver, save, be delivered; 1a) (Niphal); 1a1) to slip away;
1a2) to escape; 1a3) to be delivered; 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to lay, let slip
out (of eggs); 1b2) to let escape; 1b3) to deliver, save (life); 1c)
(Hiphil); 1c1) to give birth to; 1c2) to deliver; 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1)
to slip forth, slip out, escape; 1d2) to escape; #70, #30, #30, #10 =
`owlel (H5768): 1) child, boy; #80, #30, #9, #10, #5, #6 = Pelatyah
(H6410): 1) son of Hananiah and grandson of Zerubbabel; 2) a Simeonite
in the days of king Hezekiah of Judah who was one of the captains of 500
men who defeated the Amalekites who had escaped; 3) one of the heads of
the people who sealed the covenant with Nehemiah; 4) son of Benaiah and
one of the princes of the people against whom Ezekiel was ordered to
prophesy doom; #6, #5, #70, #40, #10, #4, #5 = `amad (H5975): 1) to
stand, remain, endure, take one's stand; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to stand, take
one's stand, be in a standing attitude, stand forth, take a stand,
present oneself, attend upon, be or become servant of; 1a2) to stand
still, stop (moving or doing), cease; 1a3) to tarry, delay, remain,
continue, abide, endure, persist, be steadfast; 1a4) to make a stand,
hold one's ground; 1a5) to stand upright, remain standing, stand up,
rise, be erect, be upright; 1a6) to arise, appear, come on the scene,
stand forth, appear, rise up or against; 1a7) to stand with, take one's
stand, be appointed, grow flat, grow insipid; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to
station, set; 1b2) to cause to stand firm, maintain; 1b3) to cause to
stand up, cause to set up, erect; 1b4) to present (one) before (king);
1b5) to appoint, ordain, establish; 1c) (Hophal) to be presented, be
caused to stand, be stood before; #80, #60 = pac (H6447): 1) palm of the
hand; #30, #5, #70, #30, #5 = `alal (H5954): 1) to thrust in, go in,
come in; 1a) (P'al) to go in, come in; 1b) (Aphel) to bring in; 1c)
(Hophal) to be brought in; #40, #40, #30, #30 = melal (H4449): 1) (Pael)
to speak, say; #10, #8, #7, #100, #10, #5 = Chizqiyah (H2396): 1) 12th
king of Judah, son of Ahaz and Abijah; a good king in that he served
Jehovah and did away with idolatrous practices; 2)
great-great-grandfather of Zephaniah the prophet; 3) son of Neariah, a
descendant of David; 4) head of a family of returning exiles in the time
of Nehemiah; #6, #30, #8, #90, #6 = lachats (H3905): 1) to squeeze,
press, oppress; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to squeeze, press; 1a2) to oppress; 1b)
(Niphal) to squeeze oneself; #10, #50, #10, #70 = nuwa` (H5128): 1) to
quiver, totter, shake, reel, stagger, wander, move, sift, make move,
wave, waver, tremble; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to wave, quiver, vibrate, swing,
stagger, tremble, be unstable; 1a2) to totter, go tottering; 1a2a)
vagabond (participle); 1b) (Niphal) to be tossed about or around; 1c)
(Hiphil); 1c1) to toss about; 1c2) to shake, cause to totter; 1c3) to
shake, disturb; 1c4) to cause to wander; #5, #6, #3, #70, #50, #6 =
yaga` (H3021): 1) to toil, labour, grow weary, be weary; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
to toil, labour; 1a2) to grow weary, be weary; 1b) (Piel) to weary, make
weary, cause to go toilsomely; 1c) (Hiphil) to make to toil, make weary,
cause to be weary; #40, #20, #30, #20, #30 = kuwl (H3557): 1) to seize,
contain, measure; 1a) (Qal) to measure, calculate; 1b) (Pilpel) to
sustain, maintain, contain; 1b1) to sustain, support, nourish; 1b2) to
contain, hold in, restrain; 1b3) to support, endure; 1c) (Polpal) to be
supplied; 1d) (Hilpil) to contain, hold, hold in, endure; 1d1) to
contain; 1d2) to sustain, endure; #5, #3, #5, #100, #9, #8, #10 = egeiro
(G1453): 1) to arouse, cause to rise; 1a) to arouse from sleep, to
awake; 1b) to arouse from the sleep of death, to recall the dead to
life; 1c) to cause to rise from a seat or bed etc.; 1d) to raise up,
produce, cause to appear; 1d1) to cause to appear, bring before the
public; 1d2) to raise up, stir up, against one; 1d3) to raise up i.e.
cause to be born; 1d4) of buildings, to raise up, construct, erect; #30,
#5, #10, #80, #5, #10 = leipo (G3007): 1) to leave, leave behind,
forsake, to be left behind; 2) to be wanting, to fail; 1a) to lag, be
inferior; 1b) to be destitute of, to lack; #5, #4, #70, #60, #1 = dokeo
(G1380): 1) to be of opinion, think, suppose; 2) to seem, to be
accounted, reputed; 3) it seems to me; 3a) I think, judge: thus in
question; 3b) it seems good to, pleased me, I determined For Synonyms
see entry 5837; #5, #100, #10, #9, #5, #10, #1 = eritheia (G2052): 1)
electioneering or intriguing for office; 1a) apparently, in the NT a
courting distinction, a desire to put one's self forward, a partisan and
fractious spirit which does not disdain low arts; 1b) partisanship,
fractiousness;
TWO CHOICES FOR #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes; I-Ching:
H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 - Closure,
Nous: #54
Time: 01:50 hrs
Date: 2017.4.17
Torah: #10 #10 #10 %81 = #30
Dao: Culturing Perspectives and Intuition
Tetra: #45 - Greatness
I-Ching: H55 - Abundance, Abounding, Fullness
Latin: Deus {The right of God} Alt: Yabmyah {Wedded to God} {
1. FORETELLS FUTURE, PROTECTS AGAINST STORMS AND SHIPWRECKS
2. FORTUNE IN BUSINESS
3. BUSINESS TRIPS
4. Syth , Theliel - in occultic lore, the angelic prince of love,
invoked in ceremonial magic to procure the woman desired
}
Jacob {He takes by the heel, he supplants, That supplants, undermines;
the heel}
- http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:1,col:8,nous:54
***@zen: 3, row: 1, col: 8, nous: 54 [Super: #338 / #68 -
Coinciding with Nature, Complying With Heaven; I-Ching: H14 - Great
Holdings, Great Possessions, Possession in great measure; Tetra: 38 -
Fullness, Ego: #375 / #54 - Culturing Perspectives and Intuition;
I-Ching: H55 - Abundance, Abounding, Fullness; Tetra: 45 - Greatness]
Nous: #73
Time: 19:55 hrs
Date: 2017.1.19
Torah: #40 #90 #200 %81 = #6
Dao: Employing Deeming, Daring to Act
Tetra: #7 - Ascent
I-Ching: H46 - Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending
Latin: Gloria {God who comforts the oppressed} Alt: Menkel {Cease Strife
Before God] {
1. HELPS HEAL THE ILLS OF THE SPIRIT, RELEASES FROM PERSECUTORS
2. MEN OF VIRTUE
3. FAITHFULNESS, INDUCES OBEDIENCE IN SUBORDINATES
4. Homoth
}
Jesus {He is saved/A savior; a deliverer} of Nazareth {Sovereign; one
chosen or set apart; separated; crowned; sanctified}; #15 CE
- http://www.grapple369.com?zen:4,row:8,col:6,nous:73
***@zen: 4, row: 8, col: 6, nous: 73 [Super: #373 / #71 - Know-How
as a Disease, Disease of Knowledge; I-Ching: H38 - Contrariety,
Opposition, Polarising, Perversion; Tetra: 6 - Contrariety, Ego: #325 /
#73 - Employing Deeming, Daring to Act; I-Ching: H46 - Climbing,
Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 7 - Ascent]
TWO CHOICES FOR #18 - Origin of Ethical Concepts, Palliation of
Vulgarity; I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding;
Tetra: 49 - Flight,
Nous: #9
Time:
Date:
Torah: #1 #30 #4 %81 = #35
Dao: Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing Placidity
Tetra: #32 - Legion
I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops
Latin: Animus {Propitious God} Alt: Yeielel {Howl to God} {
1. HELPS HIDE THAT WHICH ONE DOES NOT WISH TO REVEAL, SECRETS
2. PLAGUE & RABIES
3. HEALING
4. Viroaso
}
Noah {Rest, Repose; consolation}
- http://www.grapple369.com?zen:8,row:4,col:4,nous:9
***@zen: 8, row: 4, col: 4, nous: 9 [Date: 2017.5.2, Time: 1729
hrs, Super: #284 / #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - Marriageable
Maid/Maiden, Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - Inner, Ego: #297 / #9 -
Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The
Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion]
#ZEUS (#284) / #JUPITER (EACH CATEGORY OF UNDERSTANDING HAS #260)
Nous: #18
Time: 02:20 hrs
Date: 2017.4.26
Torah: #50 #400 #5 %81 = #50
Dao: Origin of Ethical Concepts, Palliation of Vulgarity
Tetra: #49 - Flight
I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding
Latin: Exaltator {God who gives wisdom} Alt: Vahavyah {Cry unto God Who
is God} {
1. SERVES TO OBTAIN WISDOM & DISCOVER TRUTH OF HIDDEN SECRETS
2. THE OCCULT SCIENCES, REVELATIONS IN DREAMS, PROPHECIES IN RHYME
3. THE WISE WHO LOVE SOLITUDE, MAGIC PRACTICED BY SAGES
4. Charcumis
}
Hezron {The dart of joy; the division of the song}
- http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:1,col:2,nous:18
***@zen: 1, row: 1, col: 2, nous: 18 [Super: #238 / #18 - Origin
of Ethical Concepts, Palliation of Vulgarity; I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal,
Retiring, Retreat, Yielding; Tetra: 49 - Flight, Ego: #332 / #18 -
Origin of Ethical Concepts, Palliation of Vulgarity; I-Ching: H33 -
Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding; Tetra: 49 - Flight]
&&& TO BE CONTINUED
DOLF: "It is deceptive to make the claim which you have and you ought to
publicly correct such a false statement:
WE HAVE JESUS ON THE CROSS
YOUR COLD LOVE PUT HIM THERE.
WHAT IS NOW YOUR HUMAN LOSS.
FOREVER GONE AND DESPAIR.
- http://www.grapple369.com?date:2017.1.31
"And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to [our]
father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up
children unto Abraham {father of a great multitude}." [Matthew 3:9 (KJV)]
And we'll simply for the present, let each of these religionists fret
and burdened themselves upon the weight of such a travesty to their
foundations and substance of religious belief, disbelief and non-belief.
And hopefully they don't descend into anarchy and chaotic violence as
juggernaut {ie. any large, overpowering, destructive force or object, as
war, a giant battleship, or a powerful football team; anything requiring
blind devotion or cruel sacrifice; also called Jagannath as an ideal of
Krishna at Puri in Odisha, India annually drawn on an enormous cart and
under whose wheels devotes are said to have thrown themselves to be
crushed; Courtesy: Word of the Day on 5 February 2017;
www.dictionary.com} before there is sufficient time for the preparation
of a finalised proposition of restitution which is to be made by them as
their only dignified opportunity that will be available.
*HEBREW* *GENEALOGY* *AS* *ASSOCIATED* *LINGUISTIC* *META*-*DESCRIPTOR*
*PROTOTYPES* *TO *THE* *CHRONOLOGICAL* / *MATHEMATICAL* *VIEW* *OF*
*NATURAL* / *COMMON* *AND* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW* *AS* *CORRESPONDING*
*SYLLOGISTIC* *MICROCOSM*
The Book of Jubilees was found amongst the Dead Sea Scrolls and was
otherwise translated in 1917 by R. H. Charles and published on behalf of
the Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge within London. It
suggests that the giving of the Law at Sinai was a milestone and clearly
dependent upon the earlier religious aspirations as conveyed by the Book
of Enoch, as being related to nomenclature and the representation of
structured time by cosmological principles as understood within nature
and were articulated by meta-descriptor prototypes for all occurrence of
time: "And the angel of the presence, who went before the camp of Israel
[Exodus 14:19], took the TABLETS OF THE DIVISION OF YEARS FROM THE TIME
OF CREATION OF THE LAW AND TESTIMONY ACCORDING TO THEIR WEEKS (OF
YEARS), ACCORDING TO THE JUBILEES, year by year throughout the full
number of Jubilees, from the DAY OF CREATION UNTIL THE DAY OF THE NEW
CREATION WHEN THE HEAVEN AND EARTH AND ALL OF THEIR CREATURES SHALL BE
RENEWED ACCORDING TO THE POWERS OF HEAVEN AND ACCORDING TO THE WHOLE
NATURE OF EARTH, until the sanctuary of the LORD is created in Jerusalem
upon Mount Zion.
And all of the lights will be renewed for healing and peace and
*BLESSING* for all of the elect of Israel and in order that it might be
thus from that day and unto all the days of the earth." [Book of
Jubilees 1:29]
It is also possible to divide the number of days in 400 years in the
Gregorian calendar reforms as 146,097 days by 7 and that when made
divisible by 22 to obtain the remainder, and to arrange the Hebrew
letters in a pattern which has a remainder of #13 as being in the middle
of the Chinese 4 BCE published DAO TE CHING / I CHING division of the
year into 364.5 days and the Jewish Kabbalah equivalent which deployed a
magic square of #369 having a distinct mathematical property at centre
of #41 for the equivalent date of 13 September.
#0 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400 - Jacob {He takes by the heel, he supplants,
That supplants, undermines; the heel}] as 4000 BCE
#400 MOD 22 = 17 [#PE / #80 - Serug {Branch, Layer; twining}]
#800 MOD 22 = 12 [#LAMED / #30 - Arphaxad {I shall fail as the breast:
he cursed the breast-bottle, A healer; a releaser}]
#1200 MOD 22 = 7 [#ZAYIN / #7 - Enoch {Initiated. Figuratively to
initiate or discipline; dedicate, train up}]
#1600 MOD 22 = 2 [#BETH / #2 - Seth {Substituted, Compensated; That God
has heard my prayer and has delivered me out of affliction. Power &
Strength; put; who puts; fixed}]
#2000 MOD 22 = 19 [#QOPH / #100 - Terah {Station, delay, a station of
Israel in the wilderness, To breathe; scent; blow}]
#2400 MOD 22 = 14 [#NUN / #50 - Heber {The region beyond, One that
passes; anger}]
#2800 MOD 22 = 9 [#TETH / #9 - Lamech {Powerful, Poor; made low}]
#3200 MOD 22 = 4 [#DALETH / #4 - Kenan {Fixed, (nestlings; figuratively
a chamber or dwelling:-nest, room), buyer; owner}]
#3600 MOD 22 = 21 [#SHIN / #300 - Isaac {He laughs}]
#4000 MOD 22 = 16 [#AYIN / #70 - Reu {Friend, His friend; his shepherd}
As 'eye', 'to see', and by extension, to understand and obey, it
represents the primeval light, that is the spiritual light of God
[Genesis 1:3] as distinct to the celestial lights [Genesis 1:14-18]] =
#0 CE as BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS - MARRIAGE?), AS FAUX SUBJECTIVE
GROUNDING OF INFINITY / *DO* *NOT* *BEAR* *FALSE* *WITNESS* *BY*
PYTHAGOREAN [BABYLONIAN] HETEROS (MALE/FEMALE MARRIAGE -- WHAT IS SIN &
WICKEDNESS?) being a binary (ie. gender and spermatic as bifurcated
entities) unnatural autonomic transformative prototype imposed upon the
biological natural order and commences the symbolic associator series as
the MACROCOSM:
Thus in the Pythagorean HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER, the sacred notion of
marriage according to the religious mysteries of Roman State Religion
and Empire Governance is as a hieros gamos or heirogamy ('holy
marriage') in being the natural and common law entitlement to invoke a
coacervation of the feminine and the masculine within a sexual ritual
that plays out a marriage as between a god and a goddess, especially
when enacted in a symbolic ritual where human participants represent by
the planetary deities:
#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury,
#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus,
#65 - Soldier (Miles): Mars,
#34 - Lion (Leo): Jupiter,
#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar,
#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol Invictus, and
#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn.
CAESAR AUGUSTUS (27 BCE - #14 CE - prohibited soldiers from marrying, a
ban that remained in force for the Imperial army for nearly two centuries)
The conquest mentality and "cult of virility" shaped same-sex relations.
Roman men were free to enjoy sex with other males without a
perceived loss of masculinity or social status, as long as they took the
dominant or penetrative role. Acceptable male partners were slaves,
prostitutes, and entertainers, whose lifestyle placed them in the
nebulous social realm of infamia (in-, "not," and fama, "reputation")
was a loss of legal or social standing and was an official exclusion
from the legal protections enjoyed by a Roman citizen (ie. you couldn't
get your eucharist bread from the State), as imposed by a censor or
praetor, excluded from the normal protections accorded a citizen even if
they were technically free. Although Roman men in general seem to have
preferred youths between the ages of 12 and 20 as sexual partners,
freeborn male minors were strictly off limits, and professional
prostitutes and entertainers might be considerably older.
The infamia of entertainers did not exclude them from socializing among
the Roman elite, and entertainers who were "stars", both men and
women, sometimes became the lovers of such high-profile figures as the
dictator Sulla and Mark Antony.
#0 CE ... @1 - AUGUSTUS was worshipped as the Son of God (27 BCE - #14
CE) ... #15CE (9) ... @2 - TIBERIUS (#14 – #37 CE) ... #34CE (16) ... @3
- CALIGULA (#37 - #41 CE) ... @4 - CLAUDIUS (#41 - #54 CE) ... #65CE
(25) - @5 - NERO (#666: #54 - #68 CE) ... #111 CE (36) ... #175 CE (49)
... #260 CE (64 as I CHING META-DESCRIPTOR PROTOTYPES), #369 CE (81 as
DAO TE CHING META-DESCRIPTOR PROTOTYPES) ... #1933 - 1945CE < --- German
Fascism's Golden Age ... #2000CE < --- Jubilee 2000 as Holy Catholic
'Satanic' Tradition et al being a faux-sophistic wisdom ... #2056 as
proposed Islamic Golden Age
DUKE (FASCIST CATHOLIC) EARL WEBER: "On Preacher: How can we discern
false teachers?
MASS: Do this in memory of me.
SACRAMENTS: Holy Eucharist.
[Matthew 26:26-29, Mark 14:22-26, Luke 22:14-20, 1Corinthians 11:23-25
(11-34)]
Pagans don't listen to God."
DOLF: "More Roman Catholic lies in leading the worship.
You are so deceived:
- Julius Caesar was the sovereign pontiff
- Augustus Caesar was the son of God (hence august).
They both worshipped Satan... So what of the Pontiff in his Sovereign
city-state and your eucharist?"
CATHOLIC SERVANT (COPY CAT TALK) PROPAGANDA: "Because the communion 'for
eternal life' is followed close on by the witness rejection because of
the 'to them' [it's] clear [what is the] meaning of His "flesh/blood". I
go with the onsite witness for [t]his meaning.
The only possible plain reading has His statement above of "flesh/blood"
and eternal life followed close on with the witnesses saying they wanted
no part of it."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "No, that isn't the
only possible plain reading. In fact, I don't see how you get that
reading *at all*. BUT I recognise that /you do/.
It seems to me that the way we interpret the text is bound to be
coloured by our upbringing, background, and experience. I would imagine
that the concept of transubstantiation is so ingrained in your
experience that you find it impossible to read the text any other way.
And to me, the concept is so utterly alien that I'm obviously going to
struggle to see Jesus's words as anything other than a word picture.
Now, we can't both be right. And it's obvious to you that you're right,
and it's obvious to me that I'm right... and we know where that leads.
So the only intelligent course is for each of us to accept that the
other one is being neither insincere nor obtuse - we genuinely have
different views that we're not going to reconcile by argument."
CHUCK SCHUMER (SCHUMER-THE-LITTLE-BOY-***@CKER@DNC.ORG): "Want some
pictures of me sucking off little boys?"
DOLF: "Why would [such *MUCKRAKE* {ie. to search for and expose real or
alleged corruption, scandal, or the like, especially in politics;
Courtesy: Word of the Day for 9 February, 2017; www.dictionary.com}]
interest me of all people?
We've had such sad news today in that media reported up to 20% of
priests associated with Roman Catholic religious orders have been
historically involved within a criminal activity as the debauched life
of pedophilia [*and* *against* *their* *august* *vow* *of* *celibacy*].
So what of the Pontiff in his Sovereign city-state and your eucharist as
soggy biscuit (ie. suck on that you little ***@ck) is only then a Satanic
ritual and for which you'll keep your matrimonial oath as bestowal of
[an unmerited] soul to that wretched creature."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "Accusations aren't
proof. Whilst abuse is an extraordinarily serious problem, it is also
true that people must be presumed innocent until proven guilty in a
court of law. It is undoubtedly true that such abuse takes place, but
it is also undoubtedly true that some abuse allegations are fraudulent
or erroneous ("false memory"). The conviction statistics would give a
much more accurate picture of the real scale of the problem.
Perhaps it would be worth finding out what the /Australian/ press has to
say about events in Australia. The best data I have (which is for 2005)
reports that there are just over 3,000 Catholic priests in Australia."
DOLF: "You apologist dog: 'accusations aren't proof'
That 3 word statement makes you as guilty as the perpetrators [over]
which facts of accusations were reported by the Royal Commission [as you
know by such referenced inclusion within the message to which you have
replied] into such crimes against the humanity and dignity of the
persons [as minors who ought to be protected by the law].
Now you either retract your statement as being most improper to have
concluded and publicly made or you cease posting because you are such an
offence to the sensibilities of all that is reasonable.
Pope Francis' recent statement about Catholics making an apology to the
GLBTI Community is the second time he has done so in being equally
impudent and impotent in perversity as is your statement.
I want to see a monetary compensation made to those persons against whom
*the* *treasonable* *crimes* *was* *committed* *on* *the* *dates* *of*
31 May, 1998 and 21 June, 2000 *by* *refusal* *of* *communion* before
[*any* *other* *GLBTI* *Community* *member* *proffers* *a* *vain*
*opinion* *of* *value* *as* *whores* *of* *injustice* *and* *with* *no*
*restraint* *as* *impropriety* *and* *who* *can* *all* *wait* *in-line*
*and* *beg* *for* *their* *turn* *at* *taking* *the* *biscuit*
{[informal]: be the most remarkable or foolish of its kind}] and then I
will believe such otherwise dishonest Popery."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "Nonsense! Do you
truly think that accusations constitute proof of guilt? If that were
true, why bother with courts and judges and stuff?
People who have been *convicted* of a crime should be punished for it.
To convict someone of a crime takes more than a mere accusation. It
requires proof beyond all reasonable doubt. And that means reasonable
doubt in the minds of the jury who have heard all the evidence for and
against the allegation.
I repeat: accusations aren't proof.
Imagine what the world would be like if accusations /were/ proof. If you
bore a grudge against someone, you could accuse them of a serious crime
and they would immediately be arrested and imprisoned. Or /you/ could be
accused (without foundation, of course), and then /you'd/ be in jail. It
makes no sense at all.
Do not allow the gravity of the crime to blind you to the importance of
due process of law.
I received an email (I won't name names) telling me that, by saying that
accusations aren't proof, I was as guilty as the perpetrators! This
shows a complete ignorance of due process of law.
If the police think that there are reasonable grounds for believing that
there is a case to answer, they will arrest the suspect. Transferring
the suspect elsewhere will therefore not be possible.
In civilised countries such as the UK, there is no statute of
limitations on child abuse, as recent cases have demonstrated."
DOLF: "That was my statement and since the accusations of such perverse
crimes as theirs and of yours were made by a Royal Commission it is you
that are continuing to "show a complete ignorance of the due process of
law" and of the sovereignty of the Crown above that of the Roman
Catholic Church."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "On the contrary, I
have made it very clear that the Crown has sovereignty over the Roman
Catholic Church, by pointing out that the Church does not have the power
to prevent the police from arresting suspects."
DOLF: "Now you either fully retract your statements as being most
improper and a perverse rationale given in support of such offence and
disrespect of the "due process of law" which is the soul and character
of the [obstructionist] Roman Catholic Church and the Popes who have
sought at every turn to frustrate justice."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "I am most certainly
NOT supporting ANY offences at all. On the contrary, I am fully in
favour of the imprisonment of those who have been found guilty of crimes
that merit such imprisonment.
DOLF: "If you attempt to rationalise any further without an
unconditional apology and withdrawal of such offensive statements of
yours, [given such clear evidence of the contrary to which you have an
obligation to inform yourself: 'Perhaps it would be worth finding out
what the /Australian/ press has to say about events in Australia'] then
a complaint will be made to your Internet Service Provider due to you
engaging in unlawful activity as the advocating of pedophile activity."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "If you do so, I will
provide all relevant information to my Internet Service Provider to
demonstrate that I have at all times behaved reasonably and rationally,
and that your complaint is utterly without foundation."
DOLF: "You have one hour to make such a statement and if it does not
occur within that time it will be construed as if you have refused to
make any retraction."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "You can save yourself
the wait. I refuse to retract the perfectly sensible (and perfectly
legal) statements I have made. I don't respond well to threats,
especially threats that have no justification whatsoever.
You have made it clear that you haven't thought this through very clearly."
DOLF: "Have I made myself clear."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "I've received another
email from the same person, threatening to complain to my ISP if I don't
retract my claim that accusations aren't proof.
I don't retract the claim. Accusations are /not/ proof.
My correspondent seems to think that, by saying that accusations aren't
proof, I somehow consider the Roman Catholic Church not to be subject to
the Crown (I think he's in Australia, and I'm in the UK, so the
reference to the Crown is understandable here). Of course, I don't think
any such thing, as I made very clear in an earlier article in this thread.
Let me say it one more time: accusations are not proof.
When someone is accused of a crime, they have the right to defend
themselves against that accusation in a court of law. If the jury
decides that they are not guilty of that crime, then (in law) they are
not guilty of that crime. It's as simple as that. The mere act of
accusing does not mean that the accused is guilty. Nor does it mean that
the accused is not guilty.
If a Roman Catholic priest (or anyone else) is charged with child abuse
and is found guilty by a court of law, then he should be punished
(preferably to the full extent permissible by law). But if he is either
not charged at all, or acquitted by the court, then that's the end of
the matter.
A statistic that 1 in 14 Catholic priests in Australia have been accused
of abuse is mere scandal-mongering. A statistic that 1 in 14 Catholic
priests in Australia have been /convicted/ of abuse would be cause for
very, very serious concern."
DOLF: "You are continuing to make irrational extrapolations and
unreasonable rationalisations against the evidence of factual statements
made by the "Royal Commission Into Institutional Responses" [to
instances of complaints made of pedophilia as unlawful conduct] which
are the accusations of criminal conduct by 7% (but unto 20% within some
religious orders) [of the Roman Catholic clergy] that you have sought to
cast improper aspersions upon. The reason that they could not be
punished to the full extent permissible by law is because just like you,
the Roman Catholic Church considers itself above nature, law and order
as the exercise of fair and equitable justice by any other Sovereign
jurisdiction other than itself.
Despite your denials, you are advocating pedophilia by such wrongful
exclusions. And such conduct is unlawful and complaint will now be made
to your Internet Service Provider."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "No, I'm not. Dolf
Boek has completely misconstrued what I've said. As a result, he is
wasting your time and mine.
An article was posted in alt.christnet.christianlife that drew attention
to a newspaper headline claiming that 1 in 14 Australian Roman Catholic
priests have been accused of child abuse.
I'm not a Roman Catholic, but in the interests of reasonableness I
pointed out that a more meaningful statistic would be the rate of
convictions rather than the rate of accusations.
At no point was I abusive. At no point did I advocate illegal activity.
(Quite the reverse!)
The complaint is an over-reaction. I trust that you will ignore it."
DOLF: "It is noted that by such attributions of italicised signalling
within your apologist commentary, that you engage within pedantry as a
person who is excessively concerned with formalism, accuracy, and
precision, or one who makes an ostentatious and arrogant show of learning.
I repeat again, that the accusations are a statement of fact made by the
Royal Commission and which are supported and sustained by evidence
presented to such.
Therefore you ought as concerning your haughty display of a perverse
pedantic character of a flawed nature, correct your erroneous statements
which cast such improper aspersions upon 'due process of law' as justice
so that it is in accord with those made by the Royal Commission as being
'more meaningful' than your vain opinion."
CATHOLIC SERVANT (COPY CAT TALK) PROPAGANDA: "Indeed, but not by
argument, which is why the Christian witness immediately following the
apostles is so instructive these 2000 years hence.
Which means rejection of all history on any matter right there as well.
The christian witness is as commonly accepted by historical scholars as
for any event/person of the same time period."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "It's a data point,
that's all. It tells us what they believed, but that doesn't mean that
what they believed is /true/. And I certainly don't take it as gospel."
DOLF: "Cease making such a fraudulent and fascist claim that 2000 years
is a justification for the Roman Catholic Church continuing existence as
being substantiated by God.
*I* *demand* *that* *you* *either* *substantiate* *that* *fraud* *or*
*retract* *it* *as* *a* *deliberate* *blasphemy* *and* *falsehood*."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "Sure. And obviously
it is acknowledged to be a problem, and it is clear that the Roman
Catholic denomination must take steps to deal with it honestly and
openly and in accordance with the law.
Churches are magnets for people with problems. Unfortunately, because
Christians tend to be trusting souls, people with problems very often
get into positions of power that they can then abuse (whether sexually,
or by acquiring excessive wealth, or whatever it might be).
It is therefore not just the Roman Catholics who have to put their house
in order, but pretty much all congregations over the whole world.
It is, in my view, unreasonable to single out the Roman Catholic
denomination for attack on these grounds. I am not a Roman Catholic, of
course, but I am firmly against this constant abuse /of/ Roman Catholics
/by/ non-Catholics (just as I am against abuse of anybody by anybody).
Let's acknowledge that there's a problem (many problems, in fact), not
just within the Roman Catholic denomination but also within other
denominations, and let's resolve to deal with those problems, helping
each other towards a solution rather than using the problems as a stick
to beat each other with.
Far too often, this newsgroup is like a children's playground. It's
time for people to start growing up a bit."
DOLF: "We have a justified cause for complaint against the religious
institutions and especially the Roman Catholic Church--of which you are
also an obstructionist to our justice and human rights over which they
luxuriate in their in-humaneness and barbarism as impiety.
I'm firmly against Roman Catholics treasonable abuses of our Sovereign
rights to the free expression of a self identity as the exercise of an
autonomy of will--which is not in slavery to their bad faith as Eucharist.
*There* *are* *just* *too* *many* *Roman* *Catholic* (et al) *lawyers*
*and* *judges* *within* *this* *country* *and* *it* *is* *not*
*possible* *to* *obtain* *fair* *and* *equitable* *justice*.
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING" and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[IOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[IOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE.
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS."
MATTB: "What should be done to a Church when it is proven they helped a
priest [such as the Archbishop (now Cardinal) George Pell] cover up such
crimes? That or intentionally moved said priest around to prevent
prosecution [and he won't voluntarily come back to face such an
indictment]?"
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "That's called 'being
an accessory after the fact', and it's a criminal offence in its own
right. It should be prosecuted as such."
MATTB: "How do you prosecute them?"
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "In the UK at least,
it would be done like this: the police would track down the individuals
responsible for assisting the criminal. Then, if they decide that they
have enough evidence for a reasonable chance of conviction, they will
send the file to the Crown Prosecution Service, in whose hands the final
decision rests about whether to prosecute.
Of course, as it's very likely to end up in the Crown Court (and
therefore before a jury) they can't actually guarantee a conviction.
The point is this: crimes are not committed by organisations - not even
churches. Crimes are committed by people. So the right people to punish
are the individuals who commit the crimes (and that certainly includes
those who order other people to commit crimes, as that is also against
the law - it's called 'incitement')."
DOLF: "That fascist apologist RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD refuses to
answer [the] reply to his immoral claim of [others] having no just cause."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "If you've posted this
in any newsgroup, it counts as publication and is therefore libelous and
actionable (which means I could sue you, and I'd win).
I'm not going to sue you, because I really don't think you're being
malicious. You're just stupid. So, instead, I'm going to kill-file you.
Any further emails that you send to me will go straight in[to] the bin,
without my reading them."
DOLF: "It is not liable [for libel] at all. And is a remark which I can
[reasonably and rationally] make against you because it is sustainable
by factual [and prudent] evidence of which you [already] have in your
possession.
Are you the Fuehrer or is there someone else who is the [principle]
architect of your tawdry [accusation] that our justified claims [made]
against religious institutions such as the Roman Catholic Church
constitute an unfair impunity against them and [that] they ought not
immediately pay compensation to the unfortunate impoverished souls
[which] they continue to callously malign in any manner possible.
And not continue your contrary *WHIFFER* {ie. a person who frequently
shifts opinions, attitudes, interests etc; a person who is vacillating
or evasive in an argument; Courtesy: Word of the Day for 10 February,
2017; www.dictionary.com} as whimsical apologist fantasy that ignores
such treasonable crimes against humanity as war crimes perpetrated by
the Roman Catholic Church as being the constitutional disrespect of the
rights of the Sovereign Crown both here and in the United Kingdom which
you are also subtly making.
I caution you however, to carefully read the evidence already patiently
given to you and recommend against you[r] making any further apologist
or rancorous statements, lest they be construed as TREASON[ABLE] and you
forfeit either your liberty or life.
Have I made myself clear?"
ROBERT: "Of course. Isn't that what we've been trying to say in this
instance?"
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "Have we been reading
the same newsgroup? These accusations have been used as a stick with
which to beat the Roman Catholic denomination. That's not helpful,
because it's premature."
ROBERT: "You know, that all sounds good, but in the case of this
particular thread all I saw was fairness. No condemnation, just praise
for the guy doing what is right."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "I was talking about
the reactions *in this newsgroup*, some of which have been unthinkingly
hostile."
ROBERT: "It appears to me that all the defenders of the 'faith' and
others jumped in here and assumed what was not presented by MATTB, at
all. They want tit for tat, but they were operating under a false
conception."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "Lots of people do that."
ROBERT: "Had anyone read or followed the link they could have seen it
for what it was."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "Oh, I never (or, at
least, only very rarely) follow links like that. This is a newsgroup,
not a Web portal. If someone has something to say, they can damn well
say it here."
ROBERT: "Even you asked about how many had actually been convicted of a
crime, and that was out of place given the actions of AU, the nature of
the article, and the initial reply by me."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "Yes. This was to draw
attention to the fact that (if I'm right in my interpretation of events
from what has been posted about them here) the number of convictions is
ZERO. Is that correct?
I don't think so. I was batting, in at least one case, against a guy who
would have strung up all the priests concerned and possibly their
*mothers* as well. I thought it was important to point out that
accusations are not convictions."
ROBERT: "Who did that?"
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "Some guy called Dolf
Boek. He's in my kill-file, so I only caught his replies because he
copied them to me by email, but I learned that he was posting them here
as well. (I have since added to my email kill-file, too, as he was
getting very tiresome.)"
ROBERT: "I'm sorry, but I was talking about this thread and the
O[riginal] P[ost] which somehow appears to have been twisted and woven
into all the others you speak of."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "You're quite right -
I seem to have become cross-threaded. Sorry!"
DOLF: "Your statements either stand as [a] principle of truth [in] being
no different to case law--or they are half truth's which fail the test
of veracity when nuanced by the prism of truth as truth.
Or they are no truth at all [in being] just artifices without [any]
accountability, whose only substance is a sensualis[tic] reliance upon
the act of defecation."
ROBERT: "No, that was your cherry picking that distorts things. You are
hell bent on proving something that no one is denying.
What is the matter? YOU not getting the pound of flesh you think you
deserve?
MATTB has on more than one occasion pointed out that child molestation
by anyone is blatantly sinful, as have I. But all you and your cronies
care about is some kind of equality of guilt, we aren't guilty, we do
not condone it no matter who does it.
Your try tit for tat for equality of sin and evil will never satisfy
your need for a bound of flesh.
And you should be condoning what the archbishop [h]as said and support
his actions for repair if any are forthcoming out of all this.
Meanwhile I grow weary with your childish ways."
CATHOLIC SERVANT (COPY CAT TALK) PROPAGANDA: "This protestant expert on
child abuse in protestant groups makes the *complete* picture.
In light of his work protecting children the anti Roman Catholic Church
bashing threads has finally some balance.
To say we need to consider the *whole* picture is not to excuse the
abuse in any part of it over any other part.
I do understand pulling back the veil of ignorance that it is not only a
Roman Catholic Church problem removes a familiar crud-gal from the haters.
As other posters have said, knowing the *whole* picture should be reason
for cooperation.
DOLF: "Our hate is not without substantial righteous cause, it's pure as
justified motive and not intentional upon maleficence as a
faux-sanctified piety as unlike that love which is your sycophancy."
DOLF: "Our hate is not without substantial righteous cause, it's pure as
justified motive and not intentional upon maleficence as a
faux-sanctified piety as unlike that love which is your sycophancy."
ROY MOCK: "Yea. Verily.
What sayest, thou, of the 400 year gap in Christian history?"
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "I don't give a damn
about the 400 year gap, or lack of a gap, or whatever it might be. What
matters is what God wants. And God certainly doesn't want these
pointless, stupid, divisive arguments."
ROY MOCK: "I understand.
What, then, is the place of the doctrine of the Holy Trinity in
Christianity?"
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "My understanding of
the Holy Trinity's doctrine can be summed up in one word: love.
Ask the Father what His doctrine is, and He will answer: love.
Ask the Son what His doctrine is, and He will answer: love.
Ask the Spirit what His doctrine is, and He will answer: love.
Love, love, love. Not fight, fight, fight. Not bitch, bitch, bitch. Not
accuse, accuse, accuse. But love, love, love.
Love, love, and love, but the greatest of these is love.
I don't know of any way that I can make this any clearer."
DOLF: "THE GODLESS BABYLONIAN WHORE WANTS TO TELL US ABOUT LOVE:
Why does your definition of love not exclude anal penetration of
children by Catholic priests?
If there were no such crimes committed by Catholic priests then why have
they paid over $250 million in compensation?
The Catholic Church in Australia paid A$276 million ($212.9 million) in
compensation, treatment and other costs to thousands of victims of child
sexual offences in the past 35 years, according to a report released on
Thursday at an inquiry into institutional abuse.
The barrister prosecuting on behalf of the government established Royal
Commission, Gail Furness, said in the report there was an average delay
of 33 years between an alleged abuse and claim made against the church.
"The Royal Commission's experience is that many survivors face barriers
which deter them from reporting abuse to authorities and to the
institution in which the abuse occurred," Furness said.
A Royal Commission is Australia's most powerful type of inquiry that is
able to compel people to testify and recommend legislative changes and
criminal charges. The current inquiry was established in 2013 and is
investigating child sexual abuse in religious, government and sporting
organizations, among others.
Compensation and other payments were made in response to 3,066 of 4,445
child sexual abuse claims between 1980 and 2015, the report found. More
than 40 percent of claims were received by a handful of male orders.
The current set of hearings, focused on the Catholic Church, previously
heard that 7 percent of priests working in Australia between 1950 and
2010 were accused of child sex crimes, but few were pursued.
The report was based on analysis of data kept by Catholic Church
authorities. Last year, Australia's most senior Catholic, Cardinal
George Pell said the church had made "enormous mistakes" and
"catastrophic" choices by refusing to believe abused children, shuffling
abusive priests from parish to parish and over-relying on counselling of
priests to solve the problem."
- http://www.reuters.com/article/us-australia-abuse-idUSKBN15V046
There was never love from you as a godless whore of Babylon:
HEAVEN (H27) + EARTH (H9) +/= MAN (#36) as #666 is an encapsulation of
Roman Catholic Religious Belief.
You have the wrong end of the stick in that it's you religionists such
as Roman Catholics who are deprived of any rational mind.
There are faggots out there who are at war for their human rights and
you are going to lose because they are intent on annihilating your mind,
body and soul in any way that they can.
They're not wanting to take any prisoners, but rather to leave you
bereft of vital life like zombies.
I have in the past, even given such cursory universal observations which
are independent of gender and sexual identity as summarily proclaimed
but not exhaustively made of the sexual act. Been accused of over
intellectualising how people engage their wants within this physical act
which is always a quantification as:
#1 - a degree of avaricious want;
#2 - the potential of limitations upon reality;
#3 - a capability to beguile and stupefy with words, the quarry sought
as the object of virile necessity;
#4 - variance of acceptability as the cause for improbability;
#5 - the permissibility of idealisations;
#6 - the organisational readiness to eliminate any inhibitors to the
physical dynamics of opportunity;
#7 - to facilitate a sporting prowess of a proud accomplishment in a
mutually satisfying purposed delivery; and
#8 - a job well done, always wants more.
Although some have more succinctly surmised as nothing more than a ***@ck
you and then onto the next, until you run out of opportunities.
But I put forward the counter proposition, that it takes a considerable
effort to garnish such salient observations which are not stereotypical
of one act over any other. And to arrive at such universality, one must
needs be, without prejudice, adopt various perspectives of predilection:
whether of dominance, submissiveness, functional role, modality and its
purposed, unintentional and consequential action. As that which can
significantly challenge one's limits of acceptability as normality.
That I have as a composite anti-terrorism initiative sought to challenge
religious dogma (ie. whether belief, dis-belief or non-belief)
associated to same-sex marriage and which collectively finds its impetus
within the encapsulation of mind, body and soul as articulated by the
faux-wisdom as Pythagorean sophistry which deploys a binary (ie. gender
and spermatic bifurcated attribution) paradigm as a transformative
prototype within its HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER:
MIND: {#1 + #2 = #3} +
SCIENCE: {#3 + #4 = #7} +
OPINION: {#5 + #6 = #11} +
SENSE: {#7 + #8 = #15} = #36 (ie. H27 - Realm of its Nature as Heaven -
Formula of Universal Law + H9 - System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of
Humanity)
'I *swear* by him who the TETRAKTYS (#10) found,
Whence all our wisdom springs and which contains
Perennial Nature's fountain, cause and root.'
And whilst this encompasses a broad spectrum of opposition which is
usually conveyed in varying degrees of acceptance, permissiveness,
toleration and equitability. And in considering the existentialist
theories of sexual attraction like that of mesmerism, may find it’s
validation as authenticity within a knowledge source of ignorance,
distorted realities, delusion or some other natural biological theories.
It is an indisputable fact, that in the circumstance of extremism,
whether religious based or not, that this opposition is more likely to
be the most adversely pronounced in being unreasonable, intolerant,
hostile and violent.
It is futile as an attempt to overcome this irrational opposition from
any perspective which is exclusively dependent upon semantical argument,
hypothetical scenarios or fictional realities. One must have recourse
to factuality as circumspection which draws upon a wide spectrum of real
(ie. whether good or bad, happy or sad is immaterial) experience which
is sustained by an encapsulation of mind, body and soul as articulated
by an alternative HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER and that is capable of
sustaining sexual dynamics without exhibiting modal incongruities which
are indulgently capable of impugning the autonomy of will that is
intrinsic to sexual identity."
"Do not think that I will accuse you to the father: there is one that
accuseth you, even Moses {taken out; drawn forth}, in whom ye trust.
For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of
me. But if believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words?"
[John 5:44-47]
#4400 MOD 22 = 11 [#KAF / #20 - Shem {Exhalted Name, Name, renown}] =
#400 CE
#4800 MOD 22 = 6 [#VAV / #6 - Jared {Descent/A ruling; commanding;
coming down}] = #800 CE
#5200 MOD 22 = 1 [#ALEPH / #1 - Adam {Taken from 4 corners, Earthy;
red}] = #1200 CE
#5600 MOD 22 = 18 [#TSADE / #90 - Nahor {Snorting, Hoarse; dry; hot}] =
#1600 CE
#6000 MOD 22 = 13 [#MEM / #40 - Shelah {Sprout/That breaks; that unties;
that undresses}
As waters, peoples, nations, languages and tongues; the spring of Torah
being the source of knowledge and wisdom] = #2000 Y2K / Equinox of
Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * 364) + 182 days = Wednesday
DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the
Sabbath year of 'oth cycle

- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indT2h5MFJxblJaT2M
"And as touching the dead, that they rise: have ye not read in the book
of Moses, how in the bush spake unto him, saying I [am] the God of
Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob?" [Mark 12:36 (KJV)]
#6400 MOD 22 = 8 [#CHET / #8 - Methuselah {Man of the dart/javelin
(weapon, missile, sprout), He has sent his death}]
#6800 MOD 22 = 3 [#GIMEL / #3 - Enosh {Husband, (certain, mortal) man;
sick; despaired of; forgetful}]
#7200 MOD 22 = 20 [#RESH / #200 - Abraham {Father of a multitude, chief
of multitude}]
#7600 MOD 22 = 15 [#SAMEK / #60 - Peleg {Division}]
#8000 MOD 22 = 10 [#YOD / #10 - Noah {Rest, Repose; consolation}]
#8400 MOD 22 = 5 [#HE / #5 - Mahalalel {Praise (fame) of God}]
#8800 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400 - Jacob {He takes by the heel, he
supplants, That supplants, undermines; the heel}] as 8800 CE
THAT THE PYTHAGOREAN TETRAD IS SOPHISTIC OPINION WHICH HAS GIVEN RISE TO
THE HETEROS [BABYLONIAN] THEORY ON NUMBER, IS ITSELF DEFINED BY THIS
MICROCOSM [1-5-6-7-2-3-4-8-9] AS BEING THEN ASSOCIATED TO THE ORDER OF
THE SEPTET PHENOMENAL MACROCOSM AS THE PROGRESSION OF MAGIC SQUARES:
"And there came one of the seven angels which had the seven vials, and
talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will show unto thee the
judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters: With whom the
kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of
the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication.
So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a
woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy,
having seven heads and ten horns. And the woman was arrayed in *PURPLE*
*AND* *SCARLET* *COLOUR*, and decked with gold and precious stones and
pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and
filthiness of her fornication:
And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT,
THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.
And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the
blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great
admiration. And the angel said unto me, Wherefore didst thou marvel? I
will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast that carrieth
her, which hath the seven heads {ie. as the supposition of a septet
cosmogony principle: {1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64} giving rise to an
encapsulated [1-5-6-7-2-3-4-8-9] metaphysical microcosm within the
phenomenal septet macrocosm: #15 (9) ... #34 (16) ... #65 (25) ... #111
(36) ... #175 (49) ... #260 (64 as I CHING's meta-descriptor prototypes)
... #369 (81 as DAO TE CHING's meta-descriptor prototypes) of magic
squares} and ten {ie. as the canon of transposition from the ternary
HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER to the binary HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER with its
sovereign/marriage dynamic} horns.
The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the
bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth
shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the
foundation of the world {ie.
specifically negate this historical sovereign/marriage dynamic dogmatic
prospective by the attribution of the magic square centre: #3x3 = #123
consideration (which can be readily discerned from antiquity) and by
then making a sub-category of understanding association of many internal
date correspondence with key historical date mappings or date of the
year and from this process is obtained both the terror events of 11
September 2001 and the central #41 - Genesis Reprise upon 13 to 17
September 2001
}, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.
And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven
mountains, on which the woman sitteth.
And there are seven kings: five are fallen {ie. Roman Julio-Claudia
Dynasty (27 BCE to 68CE) of Caesars}, and one is, and the other is not
yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth {ie. the
Pythagorean Intellectual Tetrad is a sophistic opinion as faux wisdom
which comprises 8 elements:
MIND: {1 + 2 = #3} +
SCIENCE: {3 + 4 = #7} +
OPINION: {5 + 6 = #11} +
SENSE: {7 + 8 = #15} = #36 (ie. H27 - Realm of its Nature as Heaven -
Formula of Universal Law + H9 - System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of
Humanity)
}, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition. And the ten horns
which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet;
but receive power as kings one hour with the beast. These have one
mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast.
These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them:
for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him
are called, and chosen, and faithful.
And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the whore
sitteth, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues.
And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the beast, these shall hate the
whore, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh,
and burn her with fire.
For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and
give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be
fulfilled. And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which
reigneth over the kings of the earth." [Revelation 17:1-18 (KJV)]
TETRAD - #2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {BETH (DOUBLE - #1 - NATURE
CONTAINS NATURE {#4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE}) / CHERUBIM (Gk.
Cheroubim - a cherub or imaginary figures which covered the mercy seat
to the Ark of the Covenant [Exodus 25:17-22] and from where God communed
with Israel)}
{ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA {#1 + #2 + #3 + #4 = #10}
#1 - MONAD (MATTER as World of Emanation - ATZILUTH) as 3 MOTHER LETTERS
expressing by logical syllogism the following meta-principles as TRIAD
prototypes:
- PURPLE FORBIDDEN ENCLOSURE (紫微垣) / MONAD - #1 - NATURE CONTAINS
NATURE: {ALEPH (*MOTHER* - SCALES OF MERIT) / SERAPHIM (Heb. Saraph Gk.
Ophis - burning, that is, (figuratively) poisonous (serpent);
specifically a fiery (serpent) or symbolical creature (from their copper
color))}
Northern Pole (北極 - Běijí)
Four Advisors (四輔 - Sìfǔ)
Right Wall (紫微左垣 - Zǐwēiyòuyuán)
Chief Judge (大理 - Dàlǐ)
Six Jia (六甲 - Liùjiá)
Canopy Support (杠 - Gāng)
Guest House (傳舍 - Chuánshě)
Eight Kinds of Crops (八穀 - Bāgǔ)
Celestial Boat (天船 - Tiānchuán) and the Stomach (胃宿 as Wèi Xiù -
Stomach, fingers and granary/Aries) is one of the twenty-eight mansions
of the Chinese constellations and was associated with White Tiger of the
West (西方白虎).
22/7 as 3W1D ...
THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *courses* *of*
*priests* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated
to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day
intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days
"And God spake all these words, saying, 'I am the LORD thy God, which
have brought thee out of the land of Egypt {that troubles or oppresses;
anguish}, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods
before me..." [Exodus 20:1-3 (KJV)]
And whereas We did on the 17th day of September, 1900, by and with the
advice of Our Privy Council declare by proclamation that, on and after
the 1st day of January, 1901, the people of New South Wales, Victoria,
South Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania and also Western Australia,
should be united in a Federal Commonwealth of Australia: And whereas by
the said recited Act certain *POWERS*, *FUNCTIONS*, *and* *AUTHORITIES*
*were* *declared* to be vested in the Governor General: And whereas We
are *desirous* *of* *making* *effectual* *and* *permanent* *provision*
for the office of Governor General and Commander in chief in and over
Our said Commonwealth of Australia, without making new Letters Patent on
each demise of the said office. *Now* *know* *ye* *that* *We* *have*
*thought* *fit* *to* *constitute*, *ORDER*, *and* *DECLARE*, *and* *do*
*by* *these* *PRESENTS* *CONSTITUTE* *ORDER*, *and* *DECLARE*, that
there shall be a Governor General and *Commander* *in* *Chief*
(hereinafter called the Governor General) in and over Our Commonwealth
of Australia (hereinafter called Our said Commonwealth), and that the
person who shall fill the said office of *Governor* *General* *shall*
*be* *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME* *APPOINTED* by Commission under Our Sign
Manual and Signet.
It was said that the white tiger (western mansions) would only appear
when the emperor ruled with absolute virtue, or if there was peace
throughout the world)
- SUPREME PALACE ENCLOSURE (太微垣) / DUAD - #13 - *NATURE* *CONTAINS*
*NATURE*: {MEM / *MOTHER* - *THE* *TONGUE* *OF* *DECREE* *DECIDING*
*BETWEEN* *THEM*: 10 paragraphs of the Letters Patent of the Australian
Constitution 1 January 1901}
THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the
law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or
294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20
March 1996 / 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;
AS BEING A LOGICAL GROUNDING OF INFINITY;
"... Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the
LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon
the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my
commandments..." [Exodus 20:5-6 (KJV)]
I - And *we* *do* *hereby* *authorize* *and* *command* *Our* *said*
*Governor* *General* *to* *do* *and* *execute*, *in* *due* *manner*,
*all* *things* *that* *shall* *belong* *to* *his* *said* *command*,
*and* *to* *the* *trust* *We* *have* *reposed* *in* *him*, *according*
*to* *the* *several* *POWER* and *AUTHORITIES* *granted* *or*
*APPOINTED* *him* *by* *VIRTUE* of 'The Commonwealth of Australia
Constitution Act, 1900', *and* *of* *these* *present* *Letters* *Patent*
and of such Commission as may be issued to him under Our Sign Manual and
Signet, or by Order in Our Privy Council, or by Us through one of Our
Principal Secretaries of State, and to such laws as shall hereafter be
in *FORCE* in Our said Commonwealth.
- HEAVENLY MARKET ENCLOSURE (天市垣) / TRIAD - #21 - *AUTONOMOUS* *NATURE*:
{SHIN / *MOTHER* - *SCALES* *OF* *LIABILITY*: bequeathed in perpetuity
to its sovereign descendants)
THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of Autonomy},
which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as right in the
case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41
centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.
AS BEING A SUBJECTIVE GROUNDING OF INFINITY AS ETERNITY.
"...Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the
LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus
20:7 (KJV)]
IX - And We do hereby *reserve* *to* *Ourselves* *Our* *heirs* *and*
*SUCCESSORS*, *FULL* *POWER* *AND* *AUTHORITY* *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*
*TO* *REVOKE*, *ALTER*, *OR* *AMEND* *these* *Our* *Letters* *Patent*,
*as* *to* Us or *THEM* *SHALL* *SEEM* *MEET*.
CHANGE TO:
IX - And we do hereby reserve to the Lieutenant Governor as Speaker of
the Council, together in a Council comprising 8 Senate Ministers, 8
House of Representative Ministers and 8 Judicial members, from each
State appointed by the Governor General, who are given full power and
authority from time to time to revoke, alter, or amend these our Letters
Patent, as to us or them shall seem meet.
----------
#2 - DUAD (FORM as World of Creation - BRIYAH) as 7 DOUBLE expressing
the essential meta-principles as the SEPTET prototypes:
TETRAD - #2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {BETH (DOUBLE - #1 - NATURE
CONTAINS NATURE {#4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE}) / CHERUBIM (Gk.
Cheroubim - a cherub or imaginary figures which covered the mercy seat
to the Ark of the Covenant [Exodus 25:17-22] and from where God communed
with Israel)}
PENTAD - #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {GIMEL (DOUBLE - #2 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE {#5 - ACT OF NATURE}) / THRONES (Gk. Thronos - a
stately seat; by implication power or (concretely) a potentate:--seat,
throne)}
HEXAD - #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE / #1 - NATURE CONTAINS NATURE:
{DALETH (DOUBLE - #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE {#6 - FORM OF NATURE}) /
*DOMINIONS* (Gk. Kuriotes - *MASTERY*, that is, (concretely and
collectively) rulers:--dominion, government)}
HEPTAD - #11 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE {KAF (DOUBLE - #4 - NATURE
AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: {#7 - ENGENDERING NATURE}) / Government &
Non-Government Organisations}
OGDOAD - #17 / #5 - ACT OF NATURE: {PE / DOUBLE - #5 - ACT OF NATURE (#8
- TRANSFORMING NATURE)}
ENNEAD - #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF
NATURE (#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)}
VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
*OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL*
*OTHER* *THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE*
*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General,
or, *in* *the* *event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to
such person or persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the*
*PROVISIONS* *OF* *THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE*
*GOVERNMENT* of Our said Commonwealth.
DECAD - #22 / #10 - *TOTALITY* *OF* *NATURE*: {TAU / DOUBLE - #9 -
ENGENDERING NATURE (TOTALITY OF NATURE)}
X - And We do *further* *direct* *and* *enjoin* *that* *these* *Our*
*Letters* *Patent* *shall* *be* *read* *and* *proclaimed* *at* *such*
*place* *or* *places* *as* Our said Governor General *shall* *think*
*fit* within Our said Commonwealth of Australia.
-----------
#3 - TRIAD (POTENCY as World of Formation - YETZIRAH) as 12 SINGLE
LETTERS expressing the essential meta-principles as the 4 x 3 = #12
quadrant prototypes:
The trigrams therefore have correspondences in astronomy, astrology,
geography, geomancy, anatomy, the family, and elsewhere. There are two
possible sources of bagua. The first is from traditional Yin and Yang
philosophy. This is explained by Fuxi in the following way:

- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indamdsc1I5b00zWHc
The first phase is where the limitless (無極; wuji) produces the delimited
(有極; youji), and this demarcation is equivalent to the Absolute (太極;
taiji) as the infinite void/nothingness (Ain Sof - Infinite Being) of
the Primordial Source. The second phase is when the Taiji (the two
opposing forces in embryonic form) then produces two forms, named yin
(Female)-yang (Male) (陰陽) which are called Liangyi (the manifested
opposing forces). The third phase occurs when these two forms produce
four phenomena (四象; Sìxiàng): named lesser yin (少陰, shaoyin), greater
yin (太陰; taiyin, which also refers to the Moon), lesser yang (少陽,
shaoyang), and greater yang (太陽; taiyang, which also refers to the Sun).
The four phenomena (四象; Sìxiàng) act on the eight trigrams (八卦;
Bagua). Eight 'eights' results in sixty-four hexagrams.'
Or, in other words: 'Changes originate in the Ultimate; from the
Ultimate issue the two spheres. From the two spheres issue the four
elements, and from the four elements the eight diagrams' (from the book
Zhou Yi, 周易 (I Ching, 易經, The Book of Changes). That was the basic
theory of the Ultimate, giving rise to the eight diagrams. By the
Ultimate, the ancient meant the origin of all things and creatures. The
two spheres refer to heaven and earth, or yin (feminine, negative) and
yang (masculine, positive). The four elements are metal, wood, water and
fire, which are omnipresent. The eight diagrams symbolize the eight
natural phenomena: sky, earth, thunder, wind, water, fire, mountain and
lake. So, the picture represented the ancient Chinese early knowledge of
the universe.
FOUR MALE SYMBOLS (四象) OF SIGNS (OF HEAVENS, APPROVAL, ETC) AS ADVISORS
(四輔 - SÌFǓ) UPON THE CHARIOTS OF TWENTY-EIGHT LUNAR MANSiONS
- East – Azure Dragon (青龍)
- South – Vermilion Bird (朱雀)
- West – White Tiger (白虎)
- North – Black Tortoise (玄武)
- Center – Yellow Dragon (黃龍) Earth AND THE HIEROS LOGOS AS THE FAUX
LOGICAL GROUNDING OF INFINITY
They can be considered as the equivalent to the zodiacal constellations
in Western astronomy, though the Twenty-eight Mansions reflect the
movement of the Moon through a sidereal month rather than the Sun within
a tropical year.
As it is written within the Scriptures of the elect, so as to be a help
within a time of necessity: "In this manner the year is completed
scrupulously in three hundred sixty-four [#364 days as the] fixed
stations of the cosmos. Thus the signs, durations of time, the years,
and the days were shown to me by the angel Uriel, whom the Lord, God of
eternal glory, has appointed over the luminaries of heaven--(both) in
heaven and the world--in order that they--the sun, the moon, the stars,
and all the created objects which circulate in all the *CHARIOTS* of
heaven--should rule in the face of the sky and be seen on the earth to
be guides for the day and the night. Likewise Uriel showed me twelve wide
openings in the sky, along the course of the chariots of the sun, from
which" the rays of the sun break out and from which heat is diffused
upon the earth, when they are opened during the designated seasons.
- EAST (SPRING/WOOD AS #7 - ENGENDERING NATURE) – AZURE DRAGON (青龍): #1
- Horn (角 - Jiăo), #2 - Neck (亢 - Kàng), #3 - Root (氐 - Dĭ), #4 - Room
(房 - Fáng), #5 - Heart (心 - Xīn), #6 - Tail (尾- Wěi), #7 - Winnowing
Basket (箕 - Jī)
JUDAH {THE PRAISE OF THE LORD; CONFESSION} #5 - ACT OF NATURE / #2 -
NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {HE / *VIRTUES* (Gk. Arete - excellence
(intrinsic or attributed):--praise, virtue)}
ISSACHAR {REWARD; RECOMPENSE} #6 - FORM OF NATURE / #3 - NATURE
SURMOUNTS NATURE: {VAV / *POWERS* (Gk. Arche - a commencement, or
(concrete) *chief* (*in* *various* *applications* *of* *order*, *time*,
*place* *or* *rank*):--beginning, corner, (at the, the) first (estate),
*magistrate*, power, principality, principle, rule)}
ZEBULUN {DWELLING; HABITATION} #7 - ENGENDERING NATURE / #4 - NATURE
AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: {ZAYIN / *PRINCIPALITIES* (Gk. Exousia - (in the
sense of ability); privilege, that is, (subjectively) *force*, capacity,
competency, freedom, or (objectively) *MASTERY* (concretely magistrate,
superhuman, potentate, *token* *of* *control*), delegated
influence:--authority, jurisdiction, liberty, power, right, strength)}
- SOUTH (SUMMER/FIRE AS #9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE) – VERMILION BIRD (朱雀):
#22 - Well (井 - Jǐng), #23 - Ghost (鬼 - Guǐ), #24 - Willow (柳 - Liǔ),
#25 - Star (星 - Xīng), #26 - Extended Net - (張 - Zhāng) Wings (翼 - Yì),
#28 - Chariot (軫 - Zhěn)
REUBEN {WHO SEES THE SON; THE VISION OF THE SON} #8 - TRANSFORMING
NATURE / #5 - ACT OF NATURE: {CHETH / ARCHANGELS (Gk. Archaggelos - a
chief angel)}
SIMEON {THAT HEARS OR OBEYS; THAT IS HEARD} #9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE / #4
- FORM OF NATURE: {TETH / ANGELS (Gk. Aggelos - a messenger; especially
an 'angel'; by implication a church pastor or ecclesiastic)}
GAD {A BAND; A TROOP} #10 - TOTALITY OF NATURE / #7 - ENGENDERING
NATURE: {YOD / Sovereignty}
- WEST (AUTUMN/METAL AS #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE) – WHITE TIGER
(白虎): #15 (3x3 = 9 as #15) - Legs (奎 - Kuí), #16 (4x4 = 16 as #34) -
Bond (婁 - Lóu), #17 (5x5 = 25 as #65) - Stomach (胃 - Wèi), #18 (6x6 = 36
as #111) - Hairy Head (昴 - Mǎo), #19 (7x7 = 49 as #175) - Net (畢 - Bì),
#20 (8x8 = 64 as #260) - Turtle Beak (觜 - Zī), #21 (9x9 = 81 as #369) -
Three Stars (參 - Shēn)
EPHRAIM {FRUITFUL; INCREASING} #12= #9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE: {LAMED /
General Populace}
And whereas We did on the 17th day of September, 1900, by and with the
advice of Our Privy Council declare by proclamation that, on and after
the 1st day of January, 1901, the people of New South Wales, Victoria,
South Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania and also Western Australia,
should be united in a Federal Commonwealth of Australia: And whereas by
the said recited Act certain *POWERS*, *FUNCTIONS*, *and* *AUTHORITIES*
*were* *declared* to be vested in the Governor General: And whereas We
are *desirous* *of* *making* *effectual* *and* *permanent* *provision*
for the office of Governor General and Commander in chief in and over
Our said Commonwealth of Australia, without making new Letters Patent on
each demise of the said office. *Now* *know* *ye* *that* *We* *have*
*thought* *fit* *to* *constitute*, *ORDER*, *and* *DECLARE*, *and* *do*
*by* *these* *PRESENTS* *CONSTITUTE* *ORDER*, *and* *DECLARE*, that
there shall be a Governor General and *Commander* *in* *Chief*
(hereinafter called the Governor General) in and over Our Commonwealth
of Australia (hereinafter called Our said Commonwealth), and that the
person who shall fill the said office of *Governor* *General* *shall*
*be* *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME* *APPOINTED* by Commission under Our Sign
Manual and Signet.
MANASSEH {FORGETFULNESS; HE THAT IS FORGOTTEN} #14 = #2 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {NUN}
II - There shall be a Great Seal of and for Our said Commonwealth which
Our said Governor General shall keep and use for sealing all things
whatsoever that shall pass the said Great Seal. Provided that *until*
*a* *Great* *Seal* *shall* *be* *provided* *the* *Private* *Seal* *of*
*Our* *said* *Governor* *General* *may* *be* *used* *as* *the* *Great*
*Seal* of the Commonwealth of Australia.
BENJAMIN {SON OF THE RIGHT HAND} #15 =#3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {SAMEK}
III - The Governor General *may* *constitute* *and* *APPOINT*, in Our
name and on Our behalf, all such *Judges*, *Commissioners*, *Justices*
*of* *the* *Peace*, *and* *other* *necessary* *officers* *and*
*Ministers* of Our said Commonwealth, as may be lawfully constituted or
APPOINTED by Us.
- NORTH (WINTER/WATER AS #1 - NATURE CONTAINS NATURE) – BLACK TORTOISE
(玄武): #8 - Dipper (斗 - Dǒu), #9 - Ox (牛 - ), #10 - Girl (女 - Nǚ), #11 -
Emptiness (虛 - Xū), #12 - Rooftop (危 - Wēi), #13 - Encampment (室 - Shì),
#14 - Wall (壁 - Bì)
DAN {JUDGMENT; HE THAT JUDGES} #16 = #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE:
{AYIN}
IV - The Governor General, *so* *far* *as* *We* *Ourselves* *lawfully*
*may*, *upon* *sufficient* *cause* *to* *him* *appearing*, *may*
*remove* *from* *his* *office*, *or* *suspend* *from* *the* *exercise*
*of* *the* *same*, *any* *person* *exercising* *any* *office* of Our
said Commonwealth, under or by *VIRTUE* *OF* *ANY*--Commission or
Warrant granted, *or* *which* *may* *be* *granted*, *by* *Us* *in* *Our*
*name* *or* *under* *Our* *authority*.
ASHER {HAPPINESS} #18 = #6 - FORM OF NATURE: {TSADE}
VI - And whereas by 'The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act
1900,' it is amongst other things enacted, that we may authorise the
Governor General to APPOINT any person or persons, jointly or severally,
to be his Deputy or Deputies within any part of Our Commonwealth, *and*
*in* *that* *capacity* *to* *exercise*, during the pleasure of the
Governor General *such* *POWERS*, *and* *FUNCTIONS* of the said Governor
General as he thinks fit to assign to such Deputy or Deputies, subject
to any *LIMITATIONS* and directions as aforesaid, to APPOINT any person
or persons, jointly or severally. To be his Deputy or Deputies within
any part of Our said Commonwealth of Australia, and in that capacity to
exercise, during his pleasure, *such* *of* *his* *POWERS* *and*
*FUNCTIONS*, *as* *he* *may* *deem* *it* *necessary *or* *expedient*
*to* *assign* to him or them: *Provided* *always*, *that* the
APPOINTMENT of such a Deputy or Deputies *shall* *not* *affect* *the*
*exercise* *by* *the* *Governor* *General* *himself* *of* *any* *POWER*
*or* *FUNCTION*.
NAPHTALI { THAT STRUGGLES OR FIGHTS} #19 = #7 - ENGENDERING NATURE:
{QOPH - *OATHS* OF DIEU ET MON DROIT}
VII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *declare* *Our* *pleasure* *to* *be*
*that*, *in* *the* *event* of death, *INCAPACITY*, removal, or absence
of Our said Governor General out of Our said Commonwealth, *and* *all*
*and* *EVERY* *THE* *POWERS* *AND* *AUTHORITIES* herein granted to him
shall until Our further pleasure is signified therein, be vested in such
person as may be APPOINTED by Us under Our Sign Manual and Signet to be
Our Lieutenant Governor of Our said Commonwealth: or if there shall be
no such Lieutenant Governor in Our said Commonwealth, then in such
person or persons as may be APPOINTED by Us under Our Sign Manual and
Signet to administer the Government of the same. *No* *SUCH* *POWERS*
*OR* *AUTHORITIES* *SHALL* *VEST* in such Lieutenant Governor, or such
other person or persons, *UNTIL* *HE* *OR* *THEY* *SHALL* *HAVE* *TAKEN*
*THE* *OATHS* *APPOINTED* to be taken by the Governor General of Our
said Commonwealth, and in the manner provided by the Instructions
accompanying these Our Letters Patent.
Their openings (affect) the winds and the spirit of the dew (that is)
when the twelve wide openings are opened in the sky, in the extreme ends
of the earth, through which (also) the sun, the moon, the stars, and all
the (other) heavenly objects come out in the west. There are many open
windows to the left and the right, but one window produces the heat at
its designated time in the manner of those openings through which the
stars rise in accordance with their orders and set according to their
numbers. I also saw chariots in heaven running in the universe above
those openings in which the stars that do not set revolve. One
(circuit) is larger than the rest of them all, and it circles the entire
cosmos at the extreme ends of the earth." [1 Enoch 75:2-9]
As the Chinese DAOist equivalent of the generalised and inclusive term
#28 - Chariot (軫 - Zhěn) which apples to a total number of the lunar
twenty-eight mansions associated within the Chinese constellations and
which can be understood within Jewish Kabbalistic consciousness as an
allusion to the Biblical text: "There is none like the God of Israel
[ALT KJV: God of Jeshurun {upright}, who rideth upon the heaven in thy
help, and in his excellency on the sky. (v 26)] who made the Glory of
his Shekinah dwell in the heavens and his majesty in the clouds.
A dwelling place is the Glory go the Shekinah of God, from the
beginning; beneath the arm of whose might the tribes of the children of
Israel are led. He shall drive out your enemies before you and he
commanded in his Memra to blot them out. And Israel dwelt in safety
alone, in accordance with with blessings with which Jacob their father
blessed them, in a land producing grain and wine. The heavens which are
above them will also make dews and rains descend upon them.
Blessed are you Israel! Who is like you! A people whose redemption is
near from before the Lord, (who is) the shield of your help and the
protection of your armies and the container of your arms and the
strength of the exaltation of your hopes. And your enemies shall be
broken before you; and you, my people, children of Israel, shall tread
on the necks of their kings when you study the law and do the
commandments." [(c) 1997 The Order of Saint Benedict, Aramaic
Deuteronomy 33:26-29]
- CENTER – YELLOW DRAGON - Earth (黃龍):
The Yellow Emperor or Yellow Deity was conceived by a virgin mother,
Fubao, who became pregnant after seeing a yellow ray of light turning
around the Northern Dipper (in Chinese theology the principal symbol of
God). Twenty four months later the Yellow Emperor was born and was
associated to the colour yellow because it is the colour of the Earth
(Dì 地), the material substance, in which he incarnated.
The Yellow Emperor was said to have turned in the form of the Yellow
Dragon at the end of his life, to ascend to Heaven. Since the Chinese
consider him to be their ancestor, they sometimes refer to themselves as
"children of the dragon". This legend also contributed towards the use
of the Chinese dragon as a symbol of imperial power.
It was said that the white tiger (western mansions) would only appear
when the emperor ruled with absolute virtue, or if there was peace
throughout the world)
----------
THE LAWS OF NATURE: THE THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS
The phrase 'law of nature' appears to have begun to be used
systematically during the early eighteenth century. It is generally
agreed that the phrase reflects the widely-held notion, prevalent within
both orthodox Christianity and Deism, that the world was ordered by a
divine law-giver, who laid down the manner in which the creation should
behave. A 'law of nature' was thus held to be more than a descriptive
or summary of observation features of the world; it reflected a divine
decision that the world was intended to behave in this manner. With the
widespread secularisation of western culture, this general belief has
been eroded, both inside and outside the scientific community. The
phrase 'laws of nature' remained, nevertheless, although it has acquired
something of the status of a dead metaphor. It remains, however, a
concept with profound theological implication.
We may being by attempting to clarify what a 'law of nature' might be.
The term is used widely, and consequently with a degree of imprecision,
not least on account of the variety of nuanced meanings associated with
the word 'law'. It can be used to refer to universally true statements
of non-limited scope that embody only qualitative predicates. Examples
of this might include 'all metals conduct electricity' or 'at constant
pressure any gas expands with increasing temperature.' This approach to
a definition excludes what might be termed 'accidental laws,' such as
'all the animals in my garden the afternoon are cats,' or "vacuously
true generalizations," such as "all solid gold spheres are less than ten
meters in diameter," or "all unicorns weigh five kilograms" (Ayers 1956;
Carroll 1990, 191-2).
The general consensus on the nature and scope of the "laws of nature"
within the scientific community has been set out by Davies (Davies 1992,
72-92). In general terms, the "laws of nature" can be considered to
have to following features.
1) They are universal. The laws of physics are assumed to be valid at
every place and every time. They are held "to apply unfailingly
everywhere in the universe and at all epochs of cosmic history" (Davies
1992, 82). There is an interesting parallel here with the criterion
introduced in the century by Vincent of Lérins for Christian doctrines,
which were required to be things which were believed "everywhere, always
and by all (quod ubique, quod temper, quod ab omnibus creditum est)."
2) They are absolute -- that is to say, that they do not depend on the
nature of the observer (for example, his or her social status, gender,
or sexual orientation). The state of a system may change over time, and
be related to a series of contingent and circumstantial considerations;
the laws, which provide correlation between those states at various
moments, do not change with time. This aspect of the laws of nature
causes serious difficulties for a postmodern worldview, which we shall
examine in a later section of this project.
3) They are eternal, in that they are held to be grounded in the
mathematical structures which are used to represent the physical world.
The remarkable correlation between what we shall loosely term
"mathematical reality" and the observed physical world is of
considerable significance, and we shall return to this matter later. It
is of considerable importance in this context to note that all known
fundamental laws are mathematical in form.
4) They are omnipotent, in that nothing can he held to he outside their
scope.
It will not have escaped the reader’s notice that these attributes which
are, by common agreement and convention, applied to the "laws of
nature", show remarkable affinities with those which are traditionally
applied to God in theistic religious systems, such as Christianity.
Davies' analysis thus raises the question of the relation between God
and the 'last of nature', to which we now turn.
GOD AND THE LAWS OF NATURE
We may take as our Starting point a statement of Davies, who argues that
God cannot “be omnipotent, for he could not act outside the laws of
nature" (Davies 1984, 209). This, however, fails to take account of a
fundamental debate within both Christian theology and the philosophy of
religion, focussing on the question of the power of God (Oakley 1984;
van den Brink 1993; Moonan I994). In what follows, we shall explore this
major discussion, and indicate its relevance to the relation of God and
the laws of nature.
How can God act absolutely reliably, without being subject to some
external agency which compels God to act in this way? This question was
debated with some heat at Paris in the thirteenth century, in response
to a form of determism linked with the writer Averroes. For Averroes,
the reliability of God ultimately rested upon external pressures. God
was compelled to act in certain ways -- and thus acted reliably. This
approach was, however, regarded with intense suspicion by most
theologians, who saw it as a crude denial of the freedom of God. But how
could God be Said to act reliably, unless it was through external
compulsion?
In what follows, we shall consider the answer given during the
thirteenth and fourteenth centuries by writers such as Duns Scotus and
William of Ockham. The fundamental principle which is stated by these
writers is that the reliability of God is ultimately grounded in the
divine nature itself. God does not act reliably because someone or
something makes God act in this way, but because of a deliberate and
free divine decision to act like this. This decision was not a result of
coercion or external constraint, but a free decision reflecting the
nature of God himself.
In his discussion of the opening line of the Apostle’s Creed -- “I
believe in God the Father almighty” -- Ockham asks precisely what is
meant by the word “almighty (omnipotens).” It cannot, he argues, mean
that God is presently able to do anything and everything; rather, it
means that God was once free to act in this way. God has now
established an order of things which reflects a loving and righteous
divine will -- and that order, once established, will remain until the
end of time.
Ockham uses two terms to refer to these different options. The “absolute
power of God (potentia Dei absoluta)” refers to the theoretical
possibilities prior to commitment to any course of action or world
ordering. The “ordained power of God (potentia Dei ordinata)" refers to
the way things now are, which reflects the order established by God their
creator. These do not represent two different sets of options now open
to God. They represent two different moments in the great history of
salvation. And our concern is with the ordained power of God, the way in
which God orders the creation at present.
The distinction is important, yet difficult. In view of this, we shall
explore it in a little more detail. Ockham is inviting us to consider
two very different situations in which we might speak of the
“omnipotence of God." The first is this: God is confronted with a whole
array of possibilities -- such as creating the world, or not creating
the world. God can choose to actualize any of these possibilities. This
is the absolute power of God, which refers to a situation in which God
has not yet acted. (It should be noted that, for the sake of clarity of
explanation of this specific issue, we have disregarded the question of
whether God be said to “create time” or “create within time.” This is an
immensely important debate, which cannot be considered fully at this
point).
We now move away from this scenario, in which we were invited to
consider a range of possibilities which God had the potential to enact.
We now consider the scenario in which God acts -- for example, by
ordering the universe. God has chosen some options, and brought them
into being, with the result that certain potentialities are now
actualities. We are now in the realm of the ordained power of God -- a
realm in which God's power is restricted, by virtue of God's own
decision. Ockham's point is that by choosing to actualize some
potentialities, God has implicitly chosen not to actualize others.
Choosing to do something means choosing not to do something else. Once
God has chosen to create the world, the option of not creating the World
is set to one side. This means that there are certain things which God
could do once that can no longer be done. Although God could have
decided not to create the world, God has now deliberately rejected that
possibility. And that rejection means that this possibility is no longer
open.
This leads to what seems, at first sight, to be a paradoxical situation.
On account of the divine omnipotence, God is not now able to do
everything. By exercising the divine power, God has limited options. For
Ockham, God cannot now do everything. God has deliberately limited the
possibilities. God chose to limit the options which are now open. Is
that a contradiction? No. If God is really capable of doing anything,
then God must be able to become committed to a course of action -- and
stay committed to it. God can thus be said to act according to
established laws — but these are not laws which somehow have their to
origination outside God, or which can be thought of as contrary to the
nature of God. They themselves are the creation of God, and reflect the
nature and character. In acting according to established laws, God is
remaining faithful to an expression of his own nature, brought about by
his own free decision. Ockham expresses this as follows (Ockham 1966,
vol. 9, 585-6):
'God is able to do some things by his ordained power (de potentia
ordinata) and others by his absolute power (de potentia absoluta). This
distinction should not be understood to mean that there are actually in
God too powers, one of which is “ordained” and the other of which is
“absolute,” because there is only one power of God directed towards the
external world, the exercise of which is in all respects God himself.
Nor should this be understood to mean that God can do some things by his
ordained power, and others by his absolute, not his ordained, power, in
that God does nothing without having first ordained it. But it should be
understood in this way: God can do something in a manner which is
established by laws which were ordained and established by God. In this
respect, God acts according to his ordained power."
The relevance of this analysis to Davies’ statement will be clear.
Within a theistic perspective, such as that offered by Christianity, it
is quite misleading to posit a tension between God and the laws of
nature, as if the latter were somehow independent of the former, or in
some way contradicted each other. We could thus say that the absolute
power of God refers to t = 0, whereas the ordained power of God refers
to t > 0. The Christian will hold that God’s nature is somehow
expressed and embodied in the ordering of the world, which underlies the
laws of nature. That God “obeys” such laws cannot conceivably be taken
to mean that God is subservient to another being, or is obligated or
otherwise Constrained to work within an alien framework which is not of
his own making. There is a fundamental line of continuity between the
creator, the regularity of the creation, and the human perception and
expression of this regularity in the form of “laws of nature.”
PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACHES TO THE LAWS OF NATURE
Three somewhat different approaches to the “laws of nature" have been
set out in recent studies exploring the more philosophical aspects of
the matter. In the first place, there is continued support for the
Humean approach, which discerns regularity in the ordering process of
the human mind, rather than any independently-existing natural ordering
(Urbach 1988). For such writers, “laws of nature” merely record actual
or de facto regularities. Since there is no necessity in nature, the
“laws” in question can only describe what is observed, and nothing more
Observation may thus be regarded as a process which aims to impose order
on the extra-mental world. This kind of approach can be found in the
writings of Ernst Mach (Mach 1898):
"The communication of scientific knowledge always involves description,
that is, mimetic {ie.
Nous: #73
Time: 19:55 hrs
Date: 2017.1.19
Torah: #40 #90 #200 %81 = #6
Dao: Employing Deeming, Daring to Act
Tetra: #7 - Ascent
I-Ching: H46 - Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending
Latin: Gloria {God who comforts the oppressed} Alt: Menkel {Cease Strife
Before God] {
1. HELPS HEAL THE ILLS OF THE SPIRIT, RELEASES FROM PERSECUTORS
2. MEN OF VIRTUE
3. FAITHFULNESS, INDUCES OBEDIENCE IN SUBORDINATES
4. Homoth
}
Jesus {He is saved/A savior; a deliverer} of Nazareth {Sovereign; one
chosen or set apart; separated; crowned; sanctified}; #15 CE
- http://www.grapple369.com?zen:4,row:8,col:6,nous:73
ASSOCIATED TO THE 4TH JURISPRUDENT/CHRONOLOGICAL (Hebrew Kabbalah Magic
Square) PLANE AS {Nature amended in its Nature}
With Ascent (#7 as {#3, #20, #52, #73 *** , #79, #1, #16, #35, #7}),
high ambitions.
With Sinking (#64 as {#21, #9, #25, #76, #47, #76, #49, #69, #64}), low
ambitions.
***@zen: 4, row: 8, col: 6, nous: 73 [Super: #373 / #71 - Know-How
as a Disease, Disease of Knowledge; I-Ching: H38 - Contrariety,
Opposition, Polarising, Perversion; Tetra: 6 - Contrariety, Ego: #325 /
#73 - Employing Deeming, Daring to Act; I-Ching: H46 - Climbing,
Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 7 - Ascent]
SUPER MALE IDEA: #373 has 10 Categories:
#3, #70, #300 = Ga`ash (H1608): 1) a mountain of Ephraim where Joshua
was buried; #20, #40, #200, #100, #8, #5 = merqachah (H4841): 1) a
seasoning, compounding, spice-seasoning; 2) ointment pot; #10, #300, #8,
#50, #5 = shachah (H7812): 1) to bow down; 1a) (Qal) to bow down; 1b)
(Hiphil) to depress (fig); 1c) (Hithpael); 1c1) to bow down, prostrate
oneself; 1c1a) before superior in homage; 1c1b) before God in worship;
1c1c) before false gods; 1c1d) before angel; #1, #80, #70, #80, #30, #1,
#50, #1, #10, #50 = apoplanao (G635): 1) to cause to go astray; 2) to
lead away from the truth to error; 3) to go astray, stray away from; #1,
#100, #10, #40, #1, #9, #1, #10, #1, #200 = Arimathaia (G707): 1) the
name of several cities in Palestine The one mentioned in Mat. 27:57, Mk
15:43, Lk. 23:51, Jn 19:38 appears to have been the same as the
birthplace of Samuel in Mount Ephraim.; #2, #1, #100, #70, #200 = baros
(G922): 1) heaviness, weight, burden, trouble For Synonyms see entry
5819; #5, #3, #5, #100, #200, #10, #50 = egersis (G1454): 1) a rousing,
excitation; 2) a rising up; 3) resurrection from the dead;
#80, #1, #100, #8, #3, #70, #100, #10, #1 = paregoria (G3931): 1)
*ADDRESSING*, *ADDRESS*; 1a) *EXHORTATION*; 1b) *COMFORT*, *SOLACE*,
*RELIEF*, *ALLEVIATION*, *CONSOLATION*;
#200, #1, #100, #3, #1, #50, #8, #10 = sargane (G4553): 1) a braided
rope, a band; 2) a basket, a basket made of ropes, a hamper; #200, #10,
#4, #8, #100, #1, #50 = sidereos (G4603): 1) made of iron;
EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #325 has 21 Categories:
#30, #1, #4, #200, #40, #30, #20 = 'Adrammelek (H152): 1) an idol or god
of the Sepharvites, introduced to Israel by Shalmaneser the fifth; 2)
the son and murderer of Sennacherib; #20, #4, #300, #1 = deshe' (H1877):
1) grass, new grass, green herb, vegetation, young; #10, #9, #6, #300 =
tuws (H2907): 1) (Qal) to dart, flutter, rush; #5, #40, #30, #100, #100,
#10, #40 = laqaq (H3952): 1) to lap, lick, lap up; 1a) (Qal) to lap, lap
up; 1b) (Piel) to lap up;
#30, #5, #20, #10, #200, #50, #10 = nakar (H5234): 1) to recognise,
acknowledge, know, respect, discern, regard; 2) to act or treat as
foreign or strange, disguise, misconstrue; 1a) (Niphal) to be
recognised; 1b) (Piel) to regard; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to regard, observe,
pay attention to, pay regard to, notice; 1c2) to recognise (as formerly
known), perceive; 1c3) to be willing to recognise or acknowledge,
acknowledge with honour; 1c4) to be acquainted with; 1c5) to
distinguish, understand; 1d) (Hithpael) to make oneself known; 2a)
(Niphal) to disguise oneself; 2b) (Piel); 2b1) to treat as foreign
(profane); 2b2) to misconstrue; 2c) (Hithpael); 2c1) to act as alien;
2c2) to disguise oneself;
#5, #60, #10, #200, #10, #40 = ciyr (H5518): 1) pot; 2) thorn, hook,
brier; 1a) pot (household utensil); 1b) pot (of temple); 2a) thorns; 2b)
hooks; #200, #70, #40, #10, #5 = Ra`amyah` (H7485): 1) one who returned
from exile with Zerubbabel; 1a) also 'Reelaiah'; #6, #300, #5, #4, #10 =
sahed (H7717): 1) witness; #6, #300, #6, #8, #5 = shuwchah (H7745): 1)
pit; #6, #300, #9, #10 = suwt (H7750): 1) to swerve, fall away; 1a)
(Qal); 1a1) to swerve, fall away; 1a2) those falling away (participle);
#1, #3, #1, #40, #70, #10, #200 = agamos (G22): 1) unmarried, unwedded,
single;
#4, #10, #1, #40, #5, #50, #5, #10, #200 = diameno (G1265): 1) to stay
permanently, remain permanently, continue;
#5, #50, #70, #200 = heis (G1520): 1) *ONE*;
#5, #30, #20, #70, #200 = helkos (G1668): 1) a wound, esp. a wound
producing a discharge pus; 2) a sore, an ulcer; #5, #40, #70, #10, #200
= emos (G1699): 1) my, mine, etc.; #9, #1, #100, #200, #5, #10 = tharseo
(G2293): 1) to be of good courage, be of good cheer; #20, #30, #5, #70,
#200 = kleos (G2811): 1) rumour, report; 2) glory, praise;
#40, #10, #40, #5, #10, #200, #9, #1, #10 = mimeomai (G3401): 1) *TO*
*IMITATE*: *ANY* *ONE*;
#50, #5, #70, #200 = neos (G3501): 1) recently born, young, youthful; 2)
new;
#70, #10, #70, #40, #5, #50, #70, #10 = oiomai (G3633): 1) *TO*
*SUPPOSE*, *THINK*;
#100, #10, #7, #8, #200 = rhiza (G4491): 1) a root; 2) that which like a
root springs from a root, a sprout, shoot; 3) metaph. offspring, progeny;
ASSOCIATED TO THE 4TH #369 as JURISPRUDENT/CHRONOLOGICAL (Hebrew
Kabbalah Magic Square) PLANE AS (Nature amended in its Nature)
} reproduction of facts in thought, the object of which is to replace
and save the trouble of new experience. Again, to save the labour of
instruction and acquisition, concise abridged description is sought.
This is really all that natural laws are."
For Mach, the “laws of nature" arc thus nothing more than “concise
abridged descriptions” of reality, a convenient and helpful manner of
depicting reality which has no ontological significance. They are purely
heuristic in character, and cannot be held to correspond to anything
that exists independent of the mind of the observer.
Other writers adopt a viewpoint which is more sympathetic to a realist
interpretation. David Lewis may be regarded as developing some insights
John Stuart Mill, who argued that the question about “laws of nature”
may be reduced to the simpler question: “What are the fewest and
simplest assumptions, which being granted, the whole existing order of
nature would result?" (Mill 1974, vol. 7, 317). Lewis suggests that “a
contingent generalization is a law of nature if and only if it appears
as a theorem or (axiom) in each of the true deductive systems that
achieves a best combination of simplicity and strength" (Lewis 1973,
73). A “law of nature” is thus understood to be a contingent
generalization which possesses an appropriate balance of “simplicity"
and “strength", which can be formulated in a propositional manner
allowing it to function within a deductive system. As Lewis himself
later acknowledged, this seems to introduce a significant degree of
subjectivity into the definition of such a law, in that the “best
combination of simplicity and strength” is left to the judgment of the
observer. The distinction between what is a genuine law of nature and
what is simply an accidental regularity thus remains unclear.
A third approach argues that the laws of nature are to be thought of as
relations between universals (Dretske 1977; Tooley l977; Armstrong
1983). These laws of nature arc assumed to exist independently of the
human minds which attempt to discern them. Armstrong draws a fundamental
distinction between “laws of nature" and “law-statements” (Armstrong
1983, 8). A law of nature is thus a feature of the real world; a
law-statement is a human creation which attempts to express these
features. Regularities reflect the way in which certain universals stand
in a relation of “nomic necessitation” (Lange 1992, 154-5). For
Armstrong, a statement p (a “law-statement") affirms a cosmic uniformity
(“a law of nature") if (i) p is universally quantified; (ii) p is true;
(iii) p is contingent; and (iv) p contains only non-local empirical
predicates (apart from logical connectives and quantifiers) (Armstrong
I983, 12). This allows Armstrong to affirm fundamental ordering in
nature, while maintaining the provisionality of human attempts to
express and articulate such regularities.
It is beyond the scope of this work to enter into this debate, although
we shall be considering the merits of a realist approach in due course.
The Humean suggestion that “laws of nature” are imposed on nature is
widely regarded as implausible within the scientific community.
Regularity, according to this viewpoint, is not to be seen as a feature
of the “real World,” but as a construct of an order-imposing human mind.
It is widely-held within the scientific community that regularity
(including statistical regularity) is an intrinsic feature of the world,
uncovered (not imposed) by human investigation. For example, consider
the comments of Paul Davies, which would be widely endorsed by natural
scientists (Davies l992, 8Z—3):
It is important to understand that the regularities of nature are real .
. . I believe any suggestion that the laws of nature are similar
projections of the human mind is absurd. The existence of regularities
in nature is an objective mathematical fact. On the other hand, the
statements called laws that are found in textbooks clearly are human
inventions, but inventions designed to reflect, albeit imperfectly,
actually existing properties of nature. Without this assumption that
regularities are real, science is reduced to an absurdity. Another
reason why I don’t I think the laws of nature are simply made up by us
is that they help us to uncover new things about the world, sometimes
things we never suspected. The mark of a powerful law is that it goes
beyond a faithful description of the original phenomenon it was invoked
to explain, and links up with other phenomena too . . . The history of
science shows that, once a new law is accepted, its consequences are
rapidly worked out, and the law is tested in many novel contexts, often
leading to the discovery of new, unexpected and important phenomena.
This leads me to believe that in conducting science we are uncovering
real regularities and linkages out of nature, not writing them into nature.
It will be clear that a religious (and especially a Christian) approach
to the debate will focus on the idea of the ordering of the world as
something which exists in that world, independent of whether the human
mind recognizes it or not, and that this ordering can be understood to
be related to the doctrine of creation. While many natural scientists
have discarded the original theological framework which led their
predecessors of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries to speak of
“laws of nature,” there is no reason why such an insight should not be
re-appropriated by those natural scientists sensitive to the religious
aspects of their work.
Recent studies of the “laws of nature” have stressed their role in
reflecting ,and conceptualizing order (Harre 1993; Carroll 1994). This
"ordering” can be discerned at several levels, including the general
principles which appear to govern the universe and the classification
systems or “taxonomies” which play such an important role in laying the
foundations for the exploration of the laws of nature (Harte 1993,
10-11). In view of the importance of such taxonomies, we shall explore
their role in the thought of a leading botanist, noting especially the
theological aspects of the matter.
THE ANALYSIS OF ORDER: THE CASE OF LINNAEUS
One of the most significant interpretations of the observation of
ordering within the natural world is due to the eighteenth-century
Swedish naturalist Carl von Linne (1707-78), more generally known by the
Latinised form of his name, "Carolus Linnaeus" (Anderson 1997). Despite
the muddled account of his significance offered by some English
theologians (most notably, that found in Raven 1953, vol. 1, 152-8), it
is clear that Linnaeus is an important witness to a potentially creative
and illuminating mode of interaction between theological beliefs and
empirical analysis. It is widely agreed that Linnaeus’ starting point
is his perception of some form of ordering within the natural world.
Linnaeus was not really an “experimentalist", as that term is now
understood; for him, an “experiment” referred primarily to the
observation or experience of the natural world (Broberg 1975, 38).
Linnaeus brought to his taxonomical task an acute ability for accurate
observation and logical analysis, allowing him to categorize and
classify what might otherwise not be recognized as possessing any form
of regularity.
So how is this ordering to be explained? Although Linnaeus was somewhat
unorthodox by the norms of contemporary Swedish Lutheranism (Frangsmyr
1969, 216-17; Broberg 1975, 141-9), there is no doubt that a strongly
religious belief system, particularly in relation to a doctrine of
creation, informs his analysis of nature. Indeed, it is significant to
observe the form of argumentation deployed in the 1743 essay “Oratio de
telluris habitabilis incremento.” Linnaeus does not make an appeal to
the Christian doctrine of creation in establishing his argument; rather,
he considers that doctrine to be confirmed and strengthened by his
arguments concerning the relation of plants and animals (von Hoftsen
1938, 35). Linnaeus regards the world as being much older than a purely
literal reading of the Genesis creation account would suggest (Frangsmyr
1969, 223-5); his concern, however, does not focus on issues of
chronology, but rather the perception of ordering within nature, which
Linnaeus believes to rest upon, or somehow reflect, the divine creation
of the world. Indeed, it has been persuasively argued that the
perception and explanation of order within nature is the most single
important question to be addressed by Linnaeus (Larson 1971).
Linnaeus’ taxonomic system is grounded in the assumption that creation
is fixed and rational. As it happened, the first of these assumptions
would be challenged in the subsequent generation, with the rise of
evolutionary thinking (Larson 1994). Nevertheless, the time-scale
envisaged for the evolutionary process was so enormous that a mere human
life-span was insignificant in comparison. In effect, Linnaeus’
assumption of fixity proved to be adequate for his specific purposes. It
may be noted that this assumption of an orderly world, capable of
rational investigation through acute observation and logical
categorization, resonates with both the Christian doctrine of creation
and the Enlightenment belief in the harmony and rationality of the world.
Linnaeus’ views on the origins of the order he perceived were soon
subjected to criticism, most notably by George-Louis Leclere, Comte de
Buffon (Sloan 1976). Our particular interest, however, concerns the
importance of the observations of regularity within nature, and the
perceived consistency of such ordering with a Christian doctrine of
creation. At some times in history, the religious significance of this
regularity might be construed in a highly pragmatic manner, as with
Gregory of Tours in the seventh century, who noted the value of
astronomy in determining the correct times for monastic prayers
(McCluskey 1990); at others, this regularity was interpreted in more
theological terms, as the divine imposition of order on the world. Many
other such examples could be given, in which the perception of ordering
and regularity is of foundational importance to scientific advance.
Nevertheless, it must be appreciated that the perception of ordering can
also lead to difficulties for a religious perspective, as will become
clear in what follows.
ORDERING AND MECHANISM: FROM NEWTON TO PALEY
It is a simple matter of historical fact that the relationship between
“natural theology” and the “natural sciences” has been remarkably
ambivalent in terms of its intentions and outcomes. One the one hand, a
strategy originally devised by religious writers to heighten the
awareness of a religious dimension to nature ended up offering new
opportunities for a purely secular interpretation of the world; on the
other, one intended to accentuate a purely naturalistic interpretation
of the world has proved remarkably amenable to a religious position
(Brooke 1989). Nevertheless, it can be shown without difficulty that one
of the most distinctive features of British intellectual life from the
late seventeenth to the late nineteenth centuries was a pervasive belief
that science was allied to the cause of religion.
The origins of this trend are generally agreed to lie particularly with
the use made of Newton’s Principia by the Anglican apologists of the
late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries (Metzger 1938; Jacob
1976; Jacob and Jacob 1980). The factors which led to this development
are not fully understood, although there is agreement that they probably
include the following (Gascoigne 1988, 222-4):
1) A focus on natural theology led to public interest in the
interpretation of the natural world, rather than the more controversial
matter of the interpretation of the Bible (see further below) or matters
of doctrinal disagreement between various church groupings or
theological schools.
2) The nature of ecclesiastic politics in England following the
post—1688 constitution favoured that section of the Church of England
which placed an emphasis on the role of reason, rather than those which
stressed the transcendental character of divine revelation (Jacob 1976).
3) The Newtonian concept of gravity, interpreted within a theological
framework which stressed the operation of divine providence, seemed to
offer a means by which divine involvement in the World could be
maintained without lapsing into monism or dualism.
Yet it was not long before what had seemed to be a promising alliance
between science and religion led to a growing and potentially
irreversible estrangement (Odom 1966). The Newtonian system seemed to
many to suggest that the world was a self-sustaining mechanism which had
no need for divine governance or sustenance for its day-to-day
operation. By the end of the eighteenth century, it seemed to many that
Newton's system actually led to atheism or agnosticism, rather than to
faith. This can be seen reflected both in Laplace’s Treatise of
Celestial Mechanics, which effectively eliminated the need for God
(either as explanatory hypothesis or as active sustainer) in cosmology
(Odom 1966; Hahn 1981), and in the writings of the poet William Blake,
in which the Newtonian worldview is occasionally equated with Satan
(Ault l974). Percy Bysshe Shelley famously remarked that “the consistent
Newtonian is necessarily an atheist,” while Samuel Taylor Coleridge
conceded that Newton's general approach obviated the need for God (Force
1985, 155; Gascoigne 1988, 234).
Yet the rise of a mechanistic view of the world offered another approach
to natural theology, which was seized upon by some of the leading
apologists of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century (Bennett
1986). The metaphor of the universe as clockwork had already been
deployed before the advent of its most famous exponent (Mayr 1986);
nevertheless, it was in the writings of William Paley that it found its
most celebrated presentation (Clarke 1974; LeMahieu 1976; Gillespie
1990). For Paley, the Newtonian image of the world as a mechanism
immediately suggested the metaphor of a clock or watch, raising the
question of who constructed the intricate mechanism which was so
evidently displayed in the functioning of the world. Although it is
currently fashionable to deride Paley’s natural theology, this generally
rests on a failure to recognize how he managed to transform the
“clockwork” metaphor from an icon of scepticism and atheism to an
apologetic affirmation of the existence of God. As Mayr has
demonstrated, the English tradition of natural theology had, up to this
point, shied away from an appeal to mechanism, apparently for fear of
its philosophical implications (Mayr 1986, 9O~lUl). Paley saw an
apologetic opening, and seized it.
One of Paley’s most significant arguments is that mechanism implies
contrivance. Writing against the backdrop of the emerging Industrial
Revolution, Paley sought to exploit the apologetic potential of the
growing interest in machinery -- such as “watches, telescopes,
stocking-mills, and steam engines" -- within England’s literate classes
(Gillespie 1990, 216-17). For some, the mechanistic model of the
universe implied a lifeless deity (famously derided by Blake as
“Nonbodaddy”). For Paley, the model offered a new defense of the
existence of God.
The general thrust of this defense is well known, Noting the
proliferation of machinery in the England of his time, Paley argues that
only someone who is mad would suggest that such complex mechanical
technology came into being by purposeless chance. Mechanism presupposes
contrivance -- that is to say, a sense of purpose and an ability to
design and fabricate. Both the human body in particular, and the world
in general, could be seen as mechanisms which had been designed and
constructed in such a manner as to achieve harmony of both means and
ends. It must be stressed that Paley is not suggesting that there
exists an analogy between human mechanical devices and nature. The
force of his argument rests on an identity: nature is a mechanism, and
hence was possessed of an intelligent design (Gillespie 1990, 722-7).
In the end, Paley's defence of divine design may be Judged to have
failed, partly on account of the rise of Darwinism in the second part of
the nineteenth century. It is, nevertheless, an interesting episode in
natural theology, which cannot be seen simply as part of the traditional
cosmological argument (which antedated the mechanical revolution) nor
traditional natural theology (which focused ‘on natural history,
following a pattern established by John Ray in his classic Wisdom of God
Manifested in the Works of Creation (1691)). It also illustrates the
manner in which “order” and “mechanism” were seen as closely related,
for theological reasons." [The Quest For Order, The Foundations of
Dialogue In Science & Religion, Alister E. McGrath, p 59-69]
----
*** TO BE CONTINUED ***
A REVISION OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED AS A PDF DOCUMENT FROM THIS URL:
- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indalJMM055YUxLams
Initial Post: 1 May 2017
--
#5 + #6 {OPINION} = #11: Say NO to anonymous fascist propaganda every time.
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[IOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY.”
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[IOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE.
- http://www.grapple369.com
THUS I ASK, IS A MACHINE ABLE TO POSSESS A MORAL CONTEXT TO ITS
ACTUALITY AND WHICH IS CAPABLE OF LOVE TOWARDS MAN?
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS."
PYTHAGOREAN [BABYLONIAN] HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER
(c) 2016 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 2 May, 2017
*THIS* *IS* *ONLY *A* *SECOND* *PRELIMINARY* *DRAFT*
THERE IS SOME CONSIDERABLE TRANSCENDENTAL CONSCIOUSNESS WHICH I MUST
ENGAGE IN BEFORE I CAN ANSWER THE DIABOLICAL ACCUSATIONS MADE BY THE
ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH A SWAR CRIMES AND I HAVE NO INTENTION OF SHOWING
ANY GRACE IN RETURN AS I INTENTIONED TO SLAUGHTER YOUR HOPE FOR ETERNITY
WITHOUT COMPULSION OF CONSCIENCE.
*I* *AM* *HOPING* *TO* *DO* *TO* *YOU* *WHAT* *YOU* *HAVE* *DONE* *TO* *ME*.
TETRAD - #2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {BETH (DOUBLE - #1 - NATURE
CONTAINS NATURE {#4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE}) / CHERUBIM (Gk.
Cheroubim - a cherub or imaginary figures which covered the mercy seat
to the Ark of the Covenant [Exodus 25:17-22] and from where God communed
with Israel)}
#1 - MONAD (MATTER as World of Emanation - ATZILUTH) as 3 MOTHER LETTERS
expressing by logical syllogism the following meta-principles as TRIAD
prototypes:
#2 - DUAD (FORM as World of Creation - BRIYAH) as 7 DOUBLE expressing
the essential meta-principles as the SEPTET prototypes:
#3 - TRIAD (POTENCY as World of Formation - YETZIRAH) as 12 SINGLE
LETTERS expressing the essential meta-principles as the 4 quadrant
prototypes:
#4 - TETRAD (ACTUALITY as World of Action - ASSIYAH)
{ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA {#1 + #2 + #3 + #4 = #10}
For an explanation of this, I will have recourse to to Sefer Yetzirah as
Introductory Sections 1:5; 1:6; 1:7 [pages 44 to 62] and commentary upon
Eternity and Boundaries of the Universe with Sections 5:2 and 5:3 [pages
204 to 209]
SECTION 1:5
Ten Sefirot of Nothingness:
Their measure is ten
which have no end
A depth of beginning
A depth of end
A depth of good
A depth of evil
A depth of above
A depth of below
A depth of east
A depth of west
A depth of north
A depth of south
The singular Master
God faithful King
dominates over them all
from His holy dwelling
until eternity of eternities.
SECTION 1:6
Ten Sefirot of Nothingness
Their vision is like the “appearance of lightning”
Their limit has no end
And His Word in them is “running and returning”
They rush to His saying like a whirlwind
Ana’ before His throne they prostrate themselves.
SECTION 1:7
Ten Sefirot of Nothingness
Their end is imbedded in their beginning
and their beginning in their end
like a flame in a burning coal
For the Master is singular
He has no second
And before One, what do you count?
SECTION 5:2
Twelve Elementals
HVZ ChTY LNS OTZQ (#100 + #90 + #70 = #260; #60 + #50 + #30 = #140; #10
+ #9 + #8 =#27; #7 + #6 +#5 = #18)
Their foundation is the twelve diagonal boundaries:
The east upper boundary
The east northern boundary
The east lower boundary
The south upper boundary
The south eastern boundary
The south “lower boundary
The west upper boundary
The west southern boundary
The west lower boundary
The north upper boundary
The north western boundary
The north lower boundary
They extend continually until eternity of eternities
And it is they that are the boundaries of the Universe.
SECTION 5:3
Twelve Elementals
HVZ ChTY LNS OTZQ (#100 + #90 + #70 = #260; #60 + #50 + #30 = #140; #10
+ #9 + #8 =#27; #7 + #6 +#5 = #18)
Their foundation is [that]
He engraved them, carved them, permuted them,
weighed them, and transformed them,
And with them He formed
twelve constellations in the Universe
twelve months in the Year
and twelve directors in the Soul,
male and female.
*** TO BE CONTINUED
ABC NEWS () @ 0947 ON 2 MAY 2017: "SEVERE TURBULENCE LEAVES 27 AEROFLOT
PASSENGERS INJURED, SOME NEEDING SURGERY:
Twenty-seven passengers have been injured, some breaking bones, after an
Aeroflot flight from Moscow to Bangkok experienced violent and
unexpected turbulence.
It was a bumpy ride for the 313 passengers travelling on board Aeroflot
flight SU 270 with video footage showing people lying in the planes
aisles surrounded by food packets and other items.
One passenger, Rostik Rusev, shared the video of social media shortly
after the flight.
He said he the turbulence was "throwing people around like crazy".
"Blood everywhere, people with broken bones, noses, open fractures,
babies with head injuries," he said.
Another passenger, Margarita Vladimir, echoed the scenes.
"We saw so many people getting seriously hurt. There were broken legs,
arms, bruised faces," Ms Vladimir told CNN.
Fifteen Russian citizens and two Thai citizens remain in hospital and
three people required surgery, according to Aeroflot.
No-one sustained life-threatening injuries.
The Russian Embassy in Bangkok said those injured had not been wearing
seat belts.
Turbulence 'impossible' to predict
The airline said the incident was "impossible to foresee".
Known as "clear-air turbulence", it can occur without any clouds and a
weather radar is unable to alert of its approach, meaning crew are
unable to warn passengers, Aeroflot said.
The airline said it will cover all costs, including medical treatment."
-
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-05-02/severe-turbulence-leaves-27-aeroflot-passengers-injured/8488350
Nous: #80
Time:
Date: 2017.11.2
Torah: #10 #30 #10 %81 = #50
Dao: Primitivist Independence, Remaining in Isolation
Tetra: #23 - Ease
I-Ching: H16 - Contentment, Enthusiasm, Providing-For, Excess
Latin: Clemens {Helpful God} Alt: Daniel {Judgement of God} {
1. GIVES PALM OF VICTORY FOR THOSE WHO ARE UNJUSTLY ATTACKED OR INVADED.
INSPIRES PASSION BETWEEN SEXES & ENSURES MARITAL FIDELITY
2. CONTROLS DESTINY OF KINGS & HIGH DIGNITARIES
3. ALL GENERATIONS
4. Asican
}
Seth {Substituted, Compensated; That God has heard my prayer and has
delivered me out of affliction. Power & Strength; put; who puts; fixed}
- http://www.grapple369.com?zen:5,row:6,col:6,nous:80
***@zen: 5, row: 6, col: 6, nous: 80 [Super: #260 / #10 -
Impossible Advice, What can Be Done?; I-Ching: H30 - Cohesion, Radiance,
Clinging to Brightness/Fire, The net; Tetra: 41 - Response, Ego: #419 /
#80 - Primitivist Independence, Remaining in Isolation; I-Ching: H16 -
Contentment, Enthusiasm, Providing-For, Excess; Tetra: 23 - Ease]
SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #260 {#81, #81, #81, #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 -
Marriageable Maid/Maiden, Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - Inner} has
34 Categories: #6, #1, #200, #3, #10, #40 = 'arag (H707): 1) to weave;
1a) (Qal); 1a1) to weave (cloth); 1a2) to braid (Samson's hair); 1a3)
weaver (subst.); 1a4) intrigue (fig.); #2, #1, #200, #7, #10, #40 =
'araz (H729): 1) to be firm; 2) made firm (past part.) (BDB/TWOT) adj;
3) firm, strong; #30, #2, #8, #10, #200, #10 = bachiyr (H972): 1)
chosen, choice one, chosen one, elect (of God); #40, #3, #2, #10, #200,
#5 = gebiyrah (H1377): 1) queen, lady; 2) queen-mother; #3, #200, #7,
#10, #40 = Geriziym (H1630): 1) a mountain in northern Israel in Ephraim
near Shechem from which the blessings were read to the Israelites on
entering Canaan; site of the Samaritan temple built after the captivity;
#4, #6, #200, #10, #40 = dowr (H1755): 1) period, generation,
habitation, dwelling; 1a) period, age, generation (period of time); 1b)
generation (those living during a period); 1c) generation (characterised
by quality, condition, class of men); 1d) dwelling-place, habitation;
#6, #8, #6, #200, #40 = Chuwram (H2361): 1) son of Bela and grandson of
Benjamin; 2) king of Tyre allied with David and Solomon; alternate
spelling for 'Hiram'; 3) a chief architect of Solomon's temple;
alternate spelling for 'Hiram'; #40, #9, #5, #200, #6 = tohar (H2892):
1) purity, purification, purifying; 2) clearness, lustre; 1a) purity;
1b) purifying; #10, #200, #40, #10 = Yeremay (H3413): 1) a descendant of
Hashum who took a foreign wife in the time of Ezra and was compelled to
put her away; #30, #20, #200, #10 = kariy (H3746): 1) a group of foreign
mercenary soldiers serving as a bodyguard for king David; also
executioners; #30, #90, #90, #10, #40 = latsats (H3945): 1) (Qal) to
scorn, make mouths at, talk arrogantly; #5, #40, #4, #6, #200, #5 =
meduwrah (H4071): 1) pile (of fuel), pyre, pile (of wood); #6, #2, #40,
#7, #200, #5 = mizreh (H4214): 1) pitchfork; #20, #40, #200 = mar
(H4752): 1) a drop, a flowing down; #40, #200, #20 = morek (H4816): 1)
weakness; #50, #5, #200, #5 = nehar (Aramaic) (H5103): 1) river; #50,
#70, #40, #50, #10, #40 = na`aman (H5282): 1) pleasantness; #60, #70,
#80, #10, #40 = ce`eph (H5588): 1) ambivalent, divided, half-hearted;
#70, #50, #80, #20, #40 = `anaph (H6057): 1) bough, branch; #30, #80,
#60, #10, #30, #10, #40 = peciyl (H6456): 1) image, idol, graven image;
#6, #90, #4, #10, #100, #10, #40 = tsaddiyq (H6662): 1) just, lawful,
righteous; 1a) just, righteous (in government); 1b) just, right (in
one's cause); 1c) just, righteous (in conduct and character); 1d)
righteous (as justified and vindicated by God); 1e) right, correct,
lawful; #6, #40, #90, #4, #10, #100, #10 = tsadaq (H6663): 1) to be
just, be righteous; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to have a just cause, be in the
right; 1a2) to be justified; 1a3) to be just (of God); 1a4) to be just,
be righteous (in conduct and character); 1b) (Niphal) to be put or made
right, be justified; 1c) (Piel) justify, make to appear righteous, make
someone righteous; 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1) to do or bring justice (in
administering law); 1d2) to declare righteous, justify; 1d3) to justify,
vindicate the cause of, save; 1d4) to make righteous, turn to
righteousness; 1e) (Hithpael) to justify oneself; #40, #90, #80, #10,
#40 = tsaphah (H6823): 1) to lay out, lay over, overlay, cover; 1a)
(Piel) to overlay, plate, stud; 1b) (Pual) to be laid over; #200, #4,
#50, #6 = ruwd (H7300): 1) to wander restlessly, roam; 1a) (Qal) to
roam; 1b) (Hiphil) to be restless, show restlessness; #50, #200, #8, #2
= rachab (H7337): 1) to be or grow wide, be or grow large; 1a) (Qal) to
be widened, be enlarged; 1b) (Niphal) broad or roomy pasture
(participle); 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to make large; 1c2) to enlarge; #200,
#8, #2, #50 = rochab (H7341): 1) breadth, width, expanse; #6, #200, #8,
#6, #40 = rachuwm (H7349): 1) compassionate; 1a) always of God with one
possible exception; #200, #20, #10, #30 = rakiyl (H7400): 1) slander,
slanderer, tale bearer, informer; #5, #200, #50, #5 = rinnah (H7440): 1)
ringing cry; 1a) of entreaty, supplication; 1b) in proclamation, joy,
praise; #4, #5, #10, #30, #10, #1, #200 = deilia (G1167): 1) timidity,
fearfulness, cowardice For Synonyms see entry 5835; #4, #10, #1, #4, #5,
#60, #1, #40, #5, #50, #70, #10 = diadechomai (G1237): 1) to receive
through another, anything left or bequeathed by him, to receive in
succession, receive in turn, succeed to; #4, #10, #1, #9, #8, #20, #8,
#200 = diatheke (G1242): 1) a disposition, arrangement, of any sort,
which one wishes to be valid, the last disposition which one makes of
his earthly possessions after his death, a testament or will; 2) a
compact, a covenant, a testament; 2a) God's covenant with Noah, etc.;
#20, #1, #9, #10, #5, #40, #5, #50, #70, #50 = kathiemi (G2524): 1) to
send down, to let down; #20, #100, #1, #10, #80, #1, #30, #8, #10 =
kraipale (G2897): 1) the giddiness and headache caused by drinking wine
to excess;
Nous: #34
Time: 04:00 hrs
Date: 2017.5.21
Torah: #30 #30 #5 %81 = #65
Dao: Great Guide, Trust in its Perfection
Tetra: #27 - Duties
I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on
what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch
Latin: Regnator {Praiseworthy God} Alt: Niathel {Wail at the Portent of
God} {
1. SERVES TO ACQUIRE 'LIGHT', CURE CONTAGIOUS DISEASES
2. LOVE, ART, SCIENCE & FORTUNE
3. THE SCIENCES
4. Asentacer
}
Jared {Descent/A ruling; commanding; coming down}
- http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:2,col:7,nous:34
***@zen: 1, row: 2, col: 7, nous: 34 [Super: #453 / #34 - Great
Guide, Trust in its Perfection; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured,
Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has been spoiled (decay),
Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 27 - Duties, Ego: #298 / #34 - Great Guide,
Trust in its Perfection; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting
Decay, Correcting, Work on what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying,
Branch; Tetra: 27 - Duties]
SUPER (MALE) IDEA: #140 {#81, #59 - A Sensible Guide, Hold Fast To
Reason; I-Ching: H42 - Increase, Augmenting; Tetra: 13 - Increase} has
126 Categories: #80, #50, #10 = paniym (H6440): 1) face; 1a) face,
faces; 1b) presence, person; 1c) face (of seraphim or cherubim); 1d)
face (of animals); 1e) face, surface (of ground); 1f) as adv of
loc/temp; 1f1) before and behind, toward, in front of, forward,
formerly, from beforetime, before; 1g) with; 1g1) in front of, before,
to the front of, in the presence of, in the face of, at the face or
front of, from the presence of, from before, from before the face of;
#40, #70, #30 = `al (H5921): 1) upon, on the ground of, according to, on
account of, on behalf of, concerning, beside, in addition to, together
with, beyond, above, over, by, on to, towards, to, against; 2) because
that, because, notwithstanding, although; 1a) upon, on the ground of, on
the basis of, on account of, because of, therefore, on behalf of, for
the sake of, for, with, in spite of, notwithstanding, concerning, in the
matter of, as regards; 1b) above, beyond, over (of excess); 1c) above,
over (of elevation or pre-eminence); 1d) upon, to, over to, unto, in
addition to, together with, with (of addition); 1e) over (of suspension
or extension); 1f) by, adjoining, next, at, over, around (of contiguity
or proximity); 1g) down upon, upon, on, from, up upon, up to,, towards,
over towards, to, against (with verbs of motion); 1h) to (as a dative)
conj; #70, #10, #50, #10 = `ayin (H5869): 1) eye; 2) spring, fountain;
1a) eye; 1a1) of physical eye; 1a2) as showing mental qualities; 1a3) of
mental and spiritual faculties (fig.); #40, #40, #50, #10 = min (H4480):
1) from, out of, on account of, off, on the side of, since, above, than,
so that not, more than; 2) that; 1a) from (expressing separation), off,
on the side of; 1b) out of; 1b1) (with verbs of proceeding, removing,
expelling); 1b2) (of material from which something is made); 1b3) (of
source or origin); 1c) out of, some of, from (partitively); 1d) from,
since, after (of time); 1e) than, more than (in comparison); 1f)
from...even to, both...and, either...or; 1g) than, more than, too much
for (in comparisons); 1h) from, on account of, through, because (with
infinitive) conj; #5, #70, #10, #50, #5 = `ayin (H5869): 1) eye; 2)
spring, fountain; 1a) eye; 1a1) of physical eye; 1a2) as showing mental
qualities; 1a3) of mental and spiritual faculties (fig.); #10, #4, #70,
#50, #6 = yada` (H3045): 1) to know; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to know; 1a1a) to
know, learn to know; 1a1b) to perceive; 1a1c) to perceive and see, find
out and discern; 1a1d) to discriminate, distinguish; 1a1e) to know by
experience; 1a1f) to recognise, admit, acknowledge, confess; 1a1g) to
consider; 1a2) to know, be acquainted with; 1a3) to know (a person
carnally); 1a4) to know how, be skilful in; 1a5) to have knowledge, be
wise; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be made known, be or become known, be
revealed; 1b2) to make oneself known; 1b3) to be perceived; 1b4) to be
instructed; 1c) (Piel) to cause to know; 1d) (Poal) to cause to know;
1e) (Pual); 1e1) to be known; 1e2) known, one known, acquaintance
(participle); 1f) (Hiphil) to make known, declare; 1g) (Hophal) to be
made known; 1h) (Hithpael) to make oneself known, reveal oneself; #70,
#50, #10, #10 = `oniy (H6040): 1) affliction, poverty, misery; 1a)
affliction; 1b) poverty; #40, #40, #10, #40, #10 = mayim (H4325): 1)
water, waters; 1a) water; 1b) water of the feet, urine; 1c) of danger,
violence, transitory things, refreshment (fig.); #5, #100, #5, #30 =
qahal (H6951): 1) assembly, company, congregation, convocation; 1a)
assembly; 1a1) for evil counsel, war or invasion, religious purposes;
1b) company (of returning exiles); 1c) congregation; 1c1) as organised
body; #5, #10, #70, #50, #5 = ya`anah (H3284): 1) an unclean bird; 1a)
owl, ostrich, literally translated as 'daughters of the owl'; 1b)
perhaps an extinct bird, exact meaning unknown; #6, #8, #30, #90, #6 =
chalats (H2502): 1) to remove, draw out, draw off, take off, withdraw,
equip (for war), arm for war, rescue, be rescued; 2) to draw off or out,
withdraw; 1a) (Qal) equipped (participle); 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be
equipped; 1b2) to go equipped; 1b3) to be armed; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to
make strong, brace up; 1c2) to invigorate; 2a) (Qal); 2a1) to draw, draw
off; 2a2) to withdraw; 2b) (Niphal); 2b1) to be delivered; 2b2) to be
saved; 2c) (Piel); 2c1) to pull out, tear out; 2c2) to rescue, deliver,
set free; 2c3) to take away, plunder; #70, #40, #30 = `amal (H5999): 1)
toil, trouble, labour; 1a) trouble; 1b) trouble, mischief; 1c) toil,
labour; #30, #50, #60 = nec (H5251): 1) something lifted up, standard,
signal, signal pole, ensign, banner, sign, sail; 1a) standard (as
rallying point), signal; 1b) standard (pole); 1c) ensign, signal; #5,
#40, #40, #30, #20, #5 = mamlakah (H4467): 1) kingdom, dominion, reign,
sovereignty; 1a) kingdom, realm; 1b) sovereignty, dominion; 1c) reign;
#70, #6, #4, #50, #10 = `owd (H5750): 1) a going round, continuance adv;
2) still, yet, again, besides; 2a) still, yet (of continuance or
persistence); 2b) still, yet, more (of addition or repetition); 2c)
again; 2d) still, moreover, besides; #5, #80, #50, #5 = panah (H6437):
1) to turn; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to turn toward or from or away; 1a2) to turn
and do; 1a3) to turn, decline (of day); 1a4) to turn toward, approach
(of evening); 1a5) to turn and look, look, look back or at or after or
for; 1b) (Piel) to turn away, put out of the way, make clear, clear
away; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to turn; 1c2) to make a turn, show signs of
turning, turn back; 1d) (Hophal) to be turned back; #10, #30, #100 =
laqaq (H3952): 1) to lap, lick, lap up; 1a) (Qal) to lap, lap up; 1b)
(Piel) to lap up; #6, #90, #40, #4 = tsemed (H6776): 1) couple, pair,
team, yoke; 1a) couple, pair, span (usually of animals); 1b) acre; 1b1)
the amount of land a span of oxen could plow in one day; #100, #30, #10
= qaliy (H7039): 1) parched grain, roasted grain; 1a) a common food;
#30, #70, #30, #10 = `Eliy (H5941): 1) descendant of Aaron through
Ithamar and high priest and judge of Israel when Samuel entered service
as a child; #10, #100, #30 = qalal (H7043): 1) to be slight, be swift,
be trifling, be of little account, be light; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be
slight, be abated (of water); 1a2) to be swift; 1a3) to be trifling, be
of little account; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be swift, show oneself swift;
1b2) to appear trifling, be too trifling, be insignificant; 1b3) to be
lightly esteemed; 1c) (Piel); 1c1) to make despicable; 1c2) to curse;
1d) (Pual) to be cursed; 1e) (Hiphil); 1e1) to make light, lighten; 1e2)
to treat with contempt, bring contempt or dishonour; 1f) (Pilpel); 1f1)
to shake; 1f2) to whet; 1g) (Hithpalpel) to shake oneself, be moved to
and fro; #40, #90, #4, #6 = tsad (H6654): 1) side; #6, #90, #30, #8, #6
= tsalach (H6743): 1) (Qal) to rush; 2) to advance, prosper, make
progress, succeed, be profitable; 2a) (Qal) to prosper; 2b) (Hiphil);
2b1) to make prosperous, bring to successful issue, cause to prosper;
2b2) to show or experience prosperity, prosper; #5, #40, #60, #30, #5 =
mecillah (H4546): 1) highway, raised way, public road; #70, #4, #10,
#50, #6 = `adiynow (H5722): 1) one of David's mighty warriors; #30, #20,
#30, #5, #50, #5 = kol (H3605): 1) all, the whole; 1a) all, the whole
of; 1b) any, each, every, anything; 1c) totality, everything; #6, #5,
#50, #40, #30, #9 = malat (H4422): 1) to slip away, escape, deliver,
save, be delivered; 1a) (Niphal); 1a1) to slip away; 1a2) to escape;
1a3) to be delivered; 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to lay, let slip out (of eggs);
1b2) to let escape; 1b3) to deliver, save (life); 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to
give birth to; 1c2) to deliver; 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1) to slip forth, slip
out, escape; 1d2) to escape; #20, #70, #40, #10 = `am (H5971): 1)
nation, people; 2) kinsman, kindred; 1a) people, nation; 1b) persons,
members of one's people, compatriots, country-men; #2, #8, #30, #100 =
cheleq (H2506): 1) portion, share, part, territory; 2) smoothness,
seductiveness, flattery; 1a) portion, share; 1b) portion, tract, parcel
(of land); 1c) one's portion, one's possession; 1d) (chosen) portion;
1e) portion, award (from God); #40, #8, #90, #2 = machtseb (H4274): 1)
hewing, hewn; 1a) of stones; #10, #90, #10, #30 = natsal (H5337): 1) to
snatch away, deliver, rescue, save, strip, plunder; 1a) (Niphal); 1a1)
to tear oneself away, deliver oneself; 1a2) to be torn out or away, be
delivered; 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to strip off, spoil; 1b2) to deliver; 1c)
(Hiphil); 1c1) to take away, snatch away; 1c2) to rescue, recover; 1c3)
to deliver (from enemies or troubles or death); 1c4) to deliver from sin
and guilt; 1d) (Hophal) to be plucked out; 1e) (Hithpael) to strip
oneself; #5, #50, #10, #70, #5 = nuwa` (H5128): 1) to quiver, totter,
shake, reel, stagger, wander, move, sift, make move, wave, waver,
tremble; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to wave, quiver, vibrate, swing, stagger,
tremble, be unstable; 1a2) to totter, go tottering; 1a2a) vagabond
(participle); 1b) (Niphal) to be tossed about or around; 1c) (Hiphil);
1c1) to toss about; 1c2) to shake, cause to totter; 1c3) to shake,
disturb; 1c4) to cause to wander; #6, #80, #30, #10, #9, #5 = peleytah
(H6413): 1) escape, deliverance; 1a) escape, deliverance; 1b) escaped
remnant; #6, #80, #30, #9, #10, #5 = Pelatyah (H6410): 1) son of
Hananiah and grandson of Zerubbabel; 2) a Simeonite in the days of king
Hezekiah of Judah who was one of the captains of 500 men who defeated
the Amalekites who had escaped; 3) one of the heads of the people who
sealed the covenant with Nehemiah; 4) son of Benaiah and one of the
princes of the people against whom Ezekiel was ordered to prophesy doom;
#20, #90, #30 = tsel (H6738): 1) shadow, shade; 1a) shadow (on dial);
1b) shadow, shade (as protection); 1c) shadow (symbolic of
transitoriness of life); #70, #7, #2, #50, #5, #6 = `azab (H5800): 1) to
leave, loose, forsake; 2) to restore, repair; 1a) (Qal) to leave; 1a1)
to depart from, leave behind, leave, let alone; 1a2) to leave, abandon,
forsake, neglect, apostatise; 1a3) to let loose, set free, let go, free;
1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be left to; 1b2) to be forsaken; 1c) (Pual) to be
deserted; 2a) (Qal) to repair; #5, #3, #2, #70, #50, #10 = Gib`oniy
(H1393): 1) an inhabitant of Gibeon; #6, #10, #70, #40, #10, #4 = `amad
(H5975): 1) to stand, remain, endure, take one's stand; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
to stand, take one's stand, be in a standing attitude, stand forth, take
a stand, present oneself, attend upon, be or become servant of; 1a2) to
stand still, stop (moving or doing), cease; 1a3) to tarry, delay,
remain, continue, abide, endure, persist, be steadfast; 1a4) to make a
stand, hold one's ground; 1a5) to stand upright, remain standing, stand
up, rise, be erect, be upright; 1a6) to arise, appear, come on the
scene, stand forth, appear, rise up or against; 1a7) to stand with, take
one's stand, be appointed, grow flat, grow insipid; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1)
to station, set; 1b2) to cause to stand firm, maintain; 1b3) to cause to
stand up, cause to set up, erect; 1b4) to present (one) before (king);
1b5) to appoint, ordain, establish; 1c) (Hophal) to be presented, be
caused to stand, be stood before; #80, #30, #30 = Palal (H6420): 1) son
of Uzai and one who assisted in restoring the walls of Jerusalem in the
time of Nehemiah; #100, #5, #30, #5 = qehillah (H6952): 1) assembly,
congregation; #6, #30, #50, #8, #40, #6 = nacham (H5162): 1) to be
sorry, console oneself, repent, regret, comfort, be comforted; 1a)
(Niphal); 1a1) to be sorry, be moved to pity, have compassion; 1a2) to
be sorry, rue, suffer grief, repent; 1a3) to comfort oneself, be
comforted; 1a4) to comfort oneself, ease oneself; 1b) (Piel) to comfort,
console; 1c) (Pual) to be comforted, be consoled; 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1)
to be sorry, have compassion; 1d2) to rue, repent of; 1d3) to comfort
oneself, be comforted; 1d4) to ease oneself; #6, #40, #10, #4, #70, #10
= yada` (H3045): 1) to know; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to know; 1a1a) to know,
learn to know; 1a1b) to perceive; 1a1c) to perceive and see, find out
and discern; 1a1d) to discriminate, distinguish; 1a1e) to know by
experience; 1a1f) to recognise, admit, acknowledge, confess; 1a1g) to
consider; 1a2) to know, be acquainted with; 1a3) to know (a person
carnally); 1a4) to know how, be skilful in; 1a5) to have knowledge, be
wise; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be made known, be or become known, be
revealed; 1b2) to make oneself known; 1b3) to be perceived; 1b4) to be
instructed; 1c) (Piel) to cause to know; 1d) (Poal) to cause to know;
1e) (Pual); 1e1) to be known; 1e2) known, one known, acquaintance
(participle); 1f) (Hiphil) to make known, declare; 1g) (Hophal) to be
made known; 1h) (Hithpael) to make oneself known, reveal oneself; #6,
#1, #8, #30, #90, #5 = chalats (H2502): 1) to remove, draw out, draw
off, take off, withdraw, equip (for war), arm for war, rescue, be
rescued; 2) to draw off or out, withdraw; 1a) (Qal) equipped
(participle); 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be equipped; 1b2) to go equipped;
1b3) to be armed; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to make strong, brace up; 1c2) to
invigorate; 2a) (Qal); 2a1) to draw, draw off; 2a2) to withdraw; 2b)
(Niphal); 2b1) to be delivered; 2b2) to be saved; 2c) (Piel); 2c1) to
pull out, tear out; 2c2) to rescue, deliver, set free; 2c3) to take
away, plunder; #10, #80, #30, #9, #5, #6 = palat (H6403): 1) to escape,
save, deliver, slip away; 1a) (Qal) to escape; 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to bring
into security, deliver; 1b2) to cause to escape, cast forth; 1b3) to be
delivered; 1b4) to slip away; 1c) (Hiphil) to bring into security, bring
to safety; #5, #90, #10, #30, #5 = natsal (H5337): 1) to snatch away,
deliver, rescue, save, strip, plunder; 1a) (Niphal); 1a1) to tear
oneself away, deliver oneself; 1a2) to be torn out or away, be
delivered; 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to strip off, spoil; 1b2) to deliver; 1c)
(Hiphil); 1c1) to take away, snatch away; 1c2) to rescue, recover; 1c3)
to deliver (from enemies or troubles or death); 1c4) to deliver from sin
and guilt; 1d) (Hophal) to be plucked out; 1e) (Hithpael) to strip
oneself; #6, #30, #40, #4, #50, #10 = lamad (H3925): 1) to learn. teach,
exercise in; 1a) (Qal) to learn; 1b) (Piel) to teach; 1c) (Pual) to be
taught, be trained; #10, #60, #70 = naca` (H5265): 1) to pull out, pull
up, set out, journey, remove, set forward, depart; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
pull out or up; 1a2) to set out, depart; 1a3) to journey, march; 1a4) to
set forth (of wind); 1b) (Niphal) to be pulled up, be removed, be
plucked up; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to cause to set out, lead out, cause to
spring up; 1c2) to remove, quarry; #1, #8, #30, #90, #5, #6 = chalats
(H2502): 1) to remove, draw out, draw off, take off, withdraw, equip
(for war), arm for war, rescue, be rescued; 2) to draw off or out,
withdraw; 1a) (Qal) equipped (participle); 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be
equipped; 1b2) to go equipped; 1b3) to be armed; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to
make strong, brace up; 1c2) to invigorate; 2a) (Qal); 2a1) to draw, draw
off; 2a2) to withdraw; 2b) (Niphal); 2b1) to be delivered; 2b2) to be
saved; 2c) (Piel); 2c1) to pull out, tear out; 2c2) to rescue, deliver,
set free; 2c3) to take away, plunder; #6, #10, #8, #30, #80, #6 =
chalaph (H2498): 1) to pass on or away, pass through, pass by, go
through, grow up, change, to go on from; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to pass on
quickly; 1a2) to pass away (vanish); 1a3) to come on anew, sprout again
(of grass); 1a4) to pass through; 1a5) to overstep, transgress; 1b)
(Piel) to cause to pass, change; 1c) (Hiph); 1c1) to change, substitute,
alter, change for better, renew; 1c2) to show newness (of tree); #70,
#30, #10, #20, #10 = `al (H5921): 1) upon, on the ground of, according
to, on account of, on behalf of, concerning, beside, in addition to,
together with, beyond, above, over, by, on to, towards, to, against; 2)
because that, because, notwithstanding, although; 1a) upon, on the
ground of, on the basis of, on account of, because of, therefore, on
behalf of, for the sake of, for, with, in spite of, notwithstanding,
concerning, in the matter of, as regards; 1b) above, beyond, over (of
excess); 1c) above, over (of elevation or pre-eminence); 1d) upon, to,
over to, unto, in addition to, together with, with (of addition); 1e)
over (of suspension or extension); 1f) by, adjoining, next, at, over,
around (of contiguity or proximity); 1g) down upon, upon, on, from, up
upon, up to,, towards, over towards, to, against (with verbs of motion);
1h) to (as a dative) conj; #10, #20, #50, #60 = kanac (H3664): 1) to
gather, collect, wrap; 1a) (Qal) to gather; 1b) (Piel) to gather; 1c)
(Hithpael) to gather together, wrap oneself up; #40, #90, #6, #4 =
matsowd (H4685): 1) siege-works, bulwark; 2) hunting implement, net n f;
3) net; 4) fastness, stronghold; #6, #60, #70, #4 = ca`ad (H5582): 1) to
support, sustain, stay, establish, strengthen, comfort; 1a) (Qal) to
support, sustain; 1a1) to sustain, stay (of heart); 1a2) to support,
uphold (of throne); #40, #100 = maq (H4716): 1) decay, rottenness; #20,
#10, #100, #6, #4 = yeqowd (H3350): 1) a burning; #6, #50, #30, #8, #40,
#6 = lacham (H3898): 1) to fight, do battle, make war; 2) (Qal) to eat,
use as food; 1a) (Qal) to fight, do battle; 1b) (Niphal) to engage in
battle, wage war; #5, #50, #6, #9, #70 = nata` (H5193): 1) to plant,
fasten, fix, establish; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to plant; 1a2) to plant,
establish (fig.); 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be planted; 1b2) to be
established (fig.); #5, #8, #7, #10, #100, #10 = chazaq (H2388): 1) to
strengthen, prevail, harden, be strong, become strong, be courageous, be
firm, grow firm, be resolute, be sore; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be strong,
grow strong; 1a1a) to prevail, prevail upon; 1a1b) to be firm, be caught
fast, be secure; 1a1c) to press, be urgent; 1a1d) to grow stout, grow
rigid, grow hard (bad sense); 1a1e) to be severe, be grievous; 1a2) to
strengthen; 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to make strong; 1b2) to restore to
strength, give strength; 1b3) to strengthen, sustain, encourage; 1b4) to
make strong, make bold, encourage; 1b5) to make firm; 1b6) to make
rigid, make hard; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to make strong, strengthen; 1c2) to
make firm; 1c3) to display strength; 1c4) to make severe; 1c5) to
support; 1c6) to repair; 1c7) to prevail, prevail upon; 1c8) to have or
take or keep hold of, retain, hold up, sustain, support; 1c9) to hold,
contain; 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1) to strengthen oneself; 1d2) to put forth
strength, use one's strength; 1d3) to withstand; 1d4) to hold strongly
with; #6, #50, #40, #30, #9, #5 = malat (H4422): 1) to slip away,
escape, deliver, save, be delivered; 1a) (Niphal); 1a1) to slip away;
1a2) to escape; 1a3) to be delivered; 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to lay, let slip
out (of eggs); 1b2) to let escape; 1b3) to deliver, save (life); 1c)
(Hiphil); 1c1) to give birth to; 1c2) to deliver; 1d) (Hithpael); 1d1)
to slip forth, slip out, escape; 1d2) to escape; #70, #30, #30, #10 =
`owlel (H5768): 1) child, boy; #80, #30, #9, #10, #5, #6 = Pelatyah
(H6410): 1) son of Hananiah and grandson of Zerubbabel; 2) a Simeonite
in the days of king Hezekiah of Judah who was one of the captains of 500
men who defeated the Amalekites who had escaped; 3) one of the heads of
the people who sealed the covenant with Nehemiah; 4) son of Benaiah and
one of the princes of the people against whom Ezekiel was ordered to
prophesy doom; #6, #5, #70, #40, #10, #4, #5 = `amad (H5975): 1) to
stand, remain, endure, take one's stand; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to stand, take
one's stand, be in a standing attitude, stand forth, take a stand,
present oneself, attend upon, be or become servant of; 1a2) to stand
still, stop (moving or doing), cease; 1a3) to tarry, delay, remain,
continue, abide, endure, persist, be steadfast; 1a4) to make a stand,
hold one's ground; 1a5) to stand upright, remain standing, stand up,
rise, be erect, be upright; 1a6) to arise, appear, come on the scene,
stand forth, appear, rise up or against; 1a7) to stand with, take one's
stand, be appointed, grow flat, grow insipid; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to
station, set; 1b2) to cause to stand firm, maintain; 1b3) to cause to
stand up, cause to set up, erect; 1b4) to present (one) before (king);
1b5) to appoint, ordain, establish; 1c) (Hophal) to be presented, be
caused to stand, be stood before; #80, #60 = pac (H6447): 1) palm of the
hand; #30, #5, #70, #30, #5 = `alal (H5954): 1) to thrust in, go in,
come in; 1a) (P'al) to go in, come in; 1b) (Aphel) to bring in; 1c)
(Hophal) to be brought in; #40, #40, #30, #30 = melal (H4449): 1) (Pael)
to speak, say; #10, #8, #7, #100, #10, #5 = Chizqiyah (H2396): 1) 12th
king of Judah, son of Ahaz and Abijah; a good king in that he served
Jehovah and did away with idolatrous practices; 2)
great-great-grandfather of Zephaniah the prophet; 3) son of Neariah, a
descendant of David; 4) head of a family of returning exiles in the time
of Nehemiah; #6, #30, #8, #90, #6 = lachats (H3905): 1) to squeeze,
press, oppress; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to squeeze, press; 1a2) to oppress; 1b)
(Niphal) to squeeze oneself; #10, #50, #10, #70 = nuwa` (H5128): 1) to
quiver, totter, shake, reel, stagger, wander, move, sift, make move,
wave, waver, tremble; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to wave, quiver, vibrate, swing,
stagger, tremble, be unstable; 1a2) to totter, go tottering; 1a2a)
vagabond (participle); 1b) (Niphal) to be tossed about or around; 1c)
(Hiphil); 1c1) to toss about; 1c2) to shake, cause to totter; 1c3) to
shake, disturb; 1c4) to cause to wander; #5, #6, #3, #70, #50, #6 =
yaga` (H3021): 1) to toil, labour, grow weary, be weary; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
to toil, labour; 1a2) to grow weary, be weary; 1b) (Piel) to weary, make
weary, cause to go toilsomely; 1c) (Hiphil) to make to toil, make weary,
cause to be weary; #40, #20, #30, #20, #30 = kuwl (H3557): 1) to seize,
contain, measure; 1a) (Qal) to measure, calculate; 1b) (Pilpel) to
sustain, maintain, contain; 1b1) to sustain, support, nourish; 1b2) to
contain, hold in, restrain; 1b3) to support, endure; 1c) (Polpal) to be
supplied; 1d) (Hilpil) to contain, hold, hold in, endure; 1d1) to
contain; 1d2) to sustain, endure; #5, #3, #5, #100, #9, #8, #10 = egeiro
(G1453): 1) to arouse, cause to rise; 1a) to arouse from sleep, to
awake; 1b) to arouse from the sleep of death, to recall the dead to
life; 1c) to cause to rise from a seat or bed etc.; 1d) to raise up,
produce, cause to appear; 1d1) to cause to appear, bring before the
public; 1d2) to raise up, stir up, against one; 1d3) to raise up i.e.
cause to be born; 1d4) of buildings, to raise up, construct, erect; #30,
#5, #10, #80, #5, #10 = leipo (G3007): 1) to leave, leave behind,
forsake, to be left behind; 2) to be wanting, to fail; 1a) to lag, be
inferior; 1b) to be destitute of, to lack; #5, #4, #70, #60, #1 = dokeo
(G1380): 1) to be of opinion, think, suppose; 2) to seem, to be
accounted, reputed; 3) it seems to me; 3a) I think, judge: thus in
question; 3b) it seems good to, pleased me, I determined For Synonyms
see entry 5837; #5, #100, #10, #9, #5, #10, #1 = eritheia (G2052): 1)
electioneering or intriguing for office; 1a) apparently, in the NT a
courting distinction, a desire to put one's self forward, a partisan and
fractious spirit which does not disdain low arts; 1b) partisanship,
fractiousness;
TWO CHOICES FOR #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes; I-Ching:
H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 - Closure,
Nous: #54
Time: 01:50 hrs
Date: 2017.4.17
Torah: #10 #10 #10 %81 = #30
Dao: Culturing Perspectives and Intuition
Tetra: #45 - Greatness
I-Ching: H55 - Abundance, Abounding, Fullness
Latin: Deus {The right of God} Alt: Yabmyah {Wedded to God} {
1. FORETELLS FUTURE, PROTECTS AGAINST STORMS AND SHIPWRECKS
2. FORTUNE IN BUSINESS
3. BUSINESS TRIPS
4. Syth , Theliel - in occultic lore, the angelic prince of love,
invoked in ceremonial magic to procure the woman desired
}
Jacob {He takes by the heel, he supplants, That supplants, undermines;
the heel}
- http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:1,col:8,nous:54
***@zen: 3, row: 1, col: 8, nous: 54 [Super: #338 / #68 -
Coinciding with Nature, Complying With Heaven; I-Ching: H14 - Great
Holdings, Great Possessions, Possession in great measure; Tetra: 38 -
Fullness, Ego: #375 / #54 - Culturing Perspectives and Intuition;
I-Ching: H55 - Abundance, Abounding, Fullness; Tetra: 45 - Greatness]
Nous: #73
Time: 19:55 hrs
Date: 2017.1.19
Torah: #40 #90 #200 %81 = #6
Dao: Employing Deeming, Daring to Act
Tetra: #7 - Ascent
I-Ching: H46 - Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending
Latin: Gloria {God who comforts the oppressed} Alt: Menkel {Cease Strife
Before God] {
1. HELPS HEAL THE ILLS OF THE SPIRIT, RELEASES FROM PERSECUTORS
2. MEN OF VIRTUE
3. FAITHFULNESS, INDUCES OBEDIENCE IN SUBORDINATES
4. Homoth
}
Jesus {He is saved/A savior; a deliverer} of Nazareth {Sovereign; one
chosen or set apart; separated; crowned; sanctified}; #15 CE
- http://www.grapple369.com?zen:4,row:8,col:6,nous:73
***@zen: 4, row: 8, col: 6, nous: 73 [Super: #373 / #71 - Know-How
as a Disease, Disease of Knowledge; I-Ching: H38 - Contrariety,
Opposition, Polarising, Perversion; Tetra: 6 - Contrariety, Ego: #325 /
#73 - Employing Deeming, Daring to Act; I-Ching: H46 - Climbing,
Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 7 - Ascent]
TWO CHOICES FOR #18 - Origin of Ethical Concepts, Palliation of
Vulgarity; I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding;
Tetra: 49 - Flight,
Nous: #9
Time:
Date:
Torah: #1 #30 #4 %81 = #35
Dao: Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing Placidity
Tetra: #32 - Legion
I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops
Latin: Animus {Propitious God} Alt: Yeielel {Howl to God} {
1. HELPS HIDE THAT WHICH ONE DOES NOT WISH TO REVEAL, SECRETS
2. PLAGUE & RABIES
3. HEALING
4. Viroaso
}
Noah {Rest, Repose; consolation}
- http://www.grapple369.com?zen:8,row:4,col:4,nous:9
***@zen: 8, row: 4, col: 4, nous: 9 [Date: 2017.5.2, Time: 1729
hrs, Super: #284 / #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - Marriageable
Maid/Maiden, Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - Inner, Ego: #297 / #9 -
Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The
Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion]
#ZEUS (#284) / #JUPITER (EACH CATEGORY OF UNDERSTANDING HAS #260)
Nous: #18
Time: 02:20 hrs
Date: 2017.4.26
Torah: #50 #400 #5 %81 = #50
Dao: Origin of Ethical Concepts, Palliation of Vulgarity
Tetra: #49 - Flight
I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding
Latin: Exaltator {God who gives wisdom} Alt: Vahavyah {Cry unto God Who
is God} {
1. SERVES TO OBTAIN WISDOM & DISCOVER TRUTH OF HIDDEN SECRETS
2. THE OCCULT SCIENCES, REVELATIONS IN DREAMS, PROPHECIES IN RHYME
3. THE WISE WHO LOVE SOLITUDE, MAGIC PRACTICED BY SAGES
4. Charcumis
}
Hezron {The dart of joy; the division of the song}
- http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:1,col:2,nous:18
***@zen: 1, row: 1, col: 2, nous: 18 [Super: #238 / #18 - Origin
of Ethical Concepts, Palliation of Vulgarity; I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal,
Retiring, Retreat, Yielding; Tetra: 49 - Flight, Ego: #332 / #18 -
Origin of Ethical Concepts, Palliation of Vulgarity; I-Ching: H33 -
Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding; Tetra: 49 - Flight]
&&& TO BE CONTINUED
DOLF: "It is deceptive to make the claim which you have and you ought to
publicly correct such a false statement:
WE HAVE JESUS ON THE CROSS
YOUR COLD LOVE PUT HIM THERE.
WHAT IS NOW YOUR HUMAN LOSS.
FOREVER GONE AND DESPAIR.
- http://www.grapple369.com?date:2017.1.31
"And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to [our]
father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up
children unto Abraham {father of a great multitude}." [Matthew 3:9 (KJV)]
And we'll simply for the present, let each of these religionists fret
and burdened themselves upon the weight of such a travesty to their
foundations and substance of religious belief, disbelief and non-belief.
And hopefully they don't descend into anarchy and chaotic violence as
juggernaut {ie. any large, overpowering, destructive force or object, as
war, a giant battleship, or a powerful football team; anything requiring
blind devotion or cruel sacrifice; also called Jagannath as an ideal of
Krishna at Puri in Odisha, India annually drawn on an enormous cart and
under whose wheels devotes are said to have thrown themselves to be
crushed; Courtesy: Word of the Day on 5 February 2017;
www.dictionary.com} before there is sufficient time for the preparation
of a finalised proposition of restitution which is to be made by them as
their only dignified opportunity that will be available.
*HEBREW* *GENEALOGY* *AS* *ASSOCIATED* *LINGUISTIC* *META*-*DESCRIPTOR*
*PROTOTYPES* *TO *THE* *CHRONOLOGICAL* / *MATHEMATICAL* *VIEW* *OF*
*NATURAL* / *COMMON* *AND* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW* *AS* *CORRESPONDING*
*SYLLOGISTIC* *MICROCOSM*
The Book of Jubilees was found amongst the Dead Sea Scrolls and was
otherwise translated in 1917 by R. H. Charles and published on behalf of
the Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge within London. It
suggests that the giving of the Law at Sinai was a milestone and clearly
dependent upon the earlier religious aspirations as conveyed by the Book
of Enoch, as being related to nomenclature and the representation of
structured time by cosmological principles as understood within nature
and were articulated by meta-descriptor prototypes for all occurrence of
time: "And the angel of the presence, who went before the camp of Israel
[Exodus 14:19], took the TABLETS OF THE DIVISION OF YEARS FROM THE TIME
OF CREATION OF THE LAW AND TESTIMONY ACCORDING TO THEIR WEEKS (OF
YEARS), ACCORDING TO THE JUBILEES, year by year throughout the full
number of Jubilees, from the DAY OF CREATION UNTIL THE DAY OF THE NEW
CREATION WHEN THE HEAVEN AND EARTH AND ALL OF THEIR CREATURES SHALL BE
RENEWED ACCORDING TO THE POWERS OF HEAVEN AND ACCORDING TO THE WHOLE
NATURE OF EARTH, until the sanctuary of the LORD is created in Jerusalem
upon Mount Zion.
And all of the lights will be renewed for healing and peace and
*BLESSING* for all of the elect of Israel and in order that it might be
thus from that day and unto all the days of the earth." [Book of
Jubilees 1:29]
It is also possible to divide the number of days in 400 years in the
Gregorian calendar reforms as 146,097 days by 7 and that when made
divisible by 22 to obtain the remainder, and to arrange the Hebrew
letters in a pattern which has a remainder of #13 as being in the middle
of the Chinese 4 BCE published DAO TE CHING / I CHING division of the
year into 364.5 days and the Jewish Kabbalah equivalent which deployed a
magic square of #369 having a distinct mathematical property at centre
of #41 for the equivalent date of 13 September.
#0 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400 - Jacob {He takes by the heel, he supplants,
That supplants, undermines; the heel}] as 4000 BCE
#400 MOD 22 = 17 [#PE / #80 - Serug {Branch, Layer; twining}]
#800 MOD 22 = 12 [#LAMED / #30 - Arphaxad {I shall fail as the breast:
he cursed the breast-bottle, A healer; a releaser}]
#1200 MOD 22 = 7 [#ZAYIN / #7 - Enoch {Initiated. Figuratively to
initiate or discipline; dedicate, train up}]
#1600 MOD 22 = 2 [#BETH / #2 - Seth {Substituted, Compensated; That God
has heard my prayer and has delivered me out of affliction. Power &
Strength; put; who puts; fixed}]
#2000 MOD 22 = 19 [#QOPH / #100 - Terah {Station, delay, a station of
Israel in the wilderness, To breathe; scent; blow}]
#2400 MOD 22 = 14 [#NUN / #50 - Heber {The region beyond, One that
passes; anger}]
#2800 MOD 22 = 9 [#TETH / #9 - Lamech {Powerful, Poor; made low}]
#3200 MOD 22 = 4 [#DALETH / #4 - Kenan {Fixed, (nestlings; figuratively
a chamber or dwelling:-nest, room), buyer; owner}]
#3600 MOD 22 = 21 [#SHIN / #300 - Isaac {He laughs}]
#4000 MOD 22 = 16 [#AYIN / #70 - Reu {Friend, His friend; his shepherd}
As 'eye', 'to see', and by extension, to understand and obey, it
represents the primeval light, that is the spiritual light of God
[Genesis 1:3] as distinct to the celestial lights [Genesis 1:14-18]] =
#0 CE as BINDING NORM (NORMA OBLIGANS - MARRIAGE?), AS FAUX SUBJECTIVE
GROUNDING OF INFINITY / *DO* *NOT* *BEAR* *FALSE* *WITNESS* *BY*
PYTHAGOREAN [BABYLONIAN] HETEROS (MALE/FEMALE MARRIAGE -- WHAT IS SIN &
WICKEDNESS?) being a binary (ie. gender and spermatic as bifurcated
entities) unnatural autonomic transformative prototype imposed upon the
biological natural order and commences the symbolic associator series as
the MACROCOSM:
Thus in the Pythagorean HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER, the sacred notion of
marriage according to the religious mysteries of Roman State Religion
and Empire Governance is as a hieros gamos or heirogamy ('holy
marriage') in being the natural and common law entitlement to invoke a
coacervation of the feminine and the masculine within a sexual ritual
that plays out a marriage as between a god and a goddess, especially
when enacted in a symbolic ritual where human participants represent by
the planetary deities:
#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury,
#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus,
#65 - Soldier (Miles): Mars,
#34 - Lion (Leo): Jupiter,
#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar,
#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol Invictus, and
#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn.
CAESAR AUGUSTUS (27 BCE - #14 CE - prohibited soldiers from marrying, a
ban that remained in force for the Imperial army for nearly two centuries)
The conquest mentality and "cult of virility" shaped same-sex relations.
Roman men were free to enjoy sex with other males without a
perceived loss of masculinity or social status, as long as they took the
dominant or penetrative role. Acceptable male partners were slaves,
prostitutes, and entertainers, whose lifestyle placed them in the
nebulous social realm of infamia (in-, "not," and fama, "reputation")
was a loss of legal or social standing and was an official exclusion
from the legal protections enjoyed by a Roman citizen (ie. you couldn't
get your eucharist bread from the State), as imposed by a censor or
praetor, excluded from the normal protections accorded a citizen even if
they were technically free. Although Roman men in general seem to have
preferred youths between the ages of 12 and 20 as sexual partners,
freeborn male minors were strictly off limits, and professional
prostitutes and entertainers might be considerably older.
The infamia of entertainers did not exclude them from socializing among
the Roman elite, and entertainers who were "stars", both men and
women, sometimes became the lovers of such high-profile figures as the
dictator Sulla and Mark Antony.
#0 CE ... @1 - AUGUSTUS was worshipped as the Son of God (27 BCE - #14
CE) ... #15CE (9) ... @2 - TIBERIUS (#14 – #37 CE) ... #34CE (16) ... @3
- CALIGULA (#37 - #41 CE) ... @4 - CLAUDIUS (#41 - #54 CE) ... #65CE
(25) - @5 - NERO (#666: #54 - #68 CE) ... #111 CE (36) ... #175 CE (49)
... #260 CE (64 as I CHING META-DESCRIPTOR PROTOTYPES), #369 CE (81 as
DAO TE CHING META-DESCRIPTOR PROTOTYPES) ... #1933 - 1945CE < --- German
Fascism's Golden Age ... #2000CE < --- Jubilee 2000 as Holy Catholic
'Satanic' Tradition et al being a faux-sophistic wisdom ... #2056 as
proposed Islamic Golden Age
DUKE (FASCIST CATHOLIC) EARL WEBER: "On Preacher: How can we discern
false teachers?
MASS: Do this in memory of me.
SACRAMENTS: Holy Eucharist.
[Matthew 26:26-29, Mark 14:22-26, Luke 22:14-20, 1Corinthians 11:23-25
(11-34)]
Pagans don't listen to God."
DOLF: "More Roman Catholic lies in leading the worship.
You are so deceived:
- Julius Caesar was the sovereign pontiff
- Augustus Caesar was the son of God (hence august).
They both worshipped Satan... So what of the Pontiff in his Sovereign
city-state and your eucharist?"
CATHOLIC SERVANT (COPY CAT TALK) PROPAGANDA: "Because the communion 'for
eternal life' is followed close on by the witness rejection because of
the 'to them' [it's] clear [what is the] meaning of His "flesh/blood". I
go with the onsite witness for [t]his meaning.
The only possible plain reading has His statement above of "flesh/blood"
and eternal life followed close on with the witnesses saying they wanted
no part of it."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "No, that isn't the
only possible plain reading. In fact, I don't see how you get that
reading *at all*. BUT I recognise that /you do/.
It seems to me that the way we interpret the text is bound to be
coloured by our upbringing, background, and experience. I would imagine
that the concept of transubstantiation is so ingrained in your
experience that you find it impossible to read the text any other way.
And to me, the concept is so utterly alien that I'm obviously going to
struggle to see Jesus's words as anything other than a word picture.
Now, we can't both be right. And it's obvious to you that you're right,
and it's obvious to me that I'm right... and we know where that leads.
So the only intelligent course is for each of us to accept that the
other one is being neither insincere nor obtuse - we genuinely have
different views that we're not going to reconcile by argument."
CHUCK SCHUMER (SCHUMER-THE-LITTLE-BOY-***@CKER@DNC.ORG): "Want some
pictures of me sucking off little boys?"
DOLF: "Why would [such *MUCKRAKE* {ie. to search for and expose real or
alleged corruption, scandal, or the like, especially in politics;
Courtesy: Word of the Day for 9 February, 2017; www.dictionary.com}]
interest me of all people?
We've had such sad news today in that media reported up to 20% of
priests associated with Roman Catholic religious orders have been
historically involved within a criminal activity as the debauched life
of pedophilia [*and* *against* *their* *august* *vow* *of* *celibacy*].
So what of the Pontiff in his Sovereign city-state and your eucharist as
soggy biscuit (ie. suck on that you little ***@ck) is only then a Satanic
ritual and for which you'll keep your matrimonial oath as bestowal of
[an unmerited] soul to that wretched creature."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "Accusations aren't
proof. Whilst abuse is an extraordinarily serious problem, it is also
true that people must be presumed innocent until proven guilty in a
court of law. It is undoubtedly true that such abuse takes place, but
it is also undoubtedly true that some abuse allegations are fraudulent
or erroneous ("false memory"). The conviction statistics would give a
much more accurate picture of the real scale of the problem.
Perhaps it would be worth finding out what the /Australian/ press has to
say about events in Australia. The best data I have (which is for 2005)
reports that there are just over 3,000 Catholic priests in Australia."
DOLF: "You apologist dog: 'accusations aren't proof'
That 3 word statement makes you as guilty as the perpetrators [over]
which facts of accusations were reported by the Royal Commission [as you
know by such referenced inclusion within the message to which you have
replied] into such crimes against the humanity and dignity of the
persons [as minors who ought to be protected by the law].
Now you either retract your statement as being most improper to have
concluded and publicly made or you cease posting because you are such an
offence to the sensibilities of all that is reasonable.
Pope Francis' recent statement about Catholics making an apology to the
GLBTI Community is the second time he has done so in being equally
impudent and impotent in perversity as is your statement.
I want to see a monetary compensation made to those persons against whom
*the* *treasonable* *crimes* *was* *committed* *on* *the* *dates* *of*
31 May, 1998 and 21 June, 2000 *by* *refusal* *of* *communion* before
[*any* *other* *GLBTI* *Community* *member* *proffers* *a* *vain*
*opinion* *of* *value* *as* *whores* *of* *injustice* *and* *with* *no*
*restraint* *as* *impropriety* *and* *who* *can* *all* *wait* *in-line*
*and* *beg* *for* *their* *turn* *at* *taking* *the* *biscuit*
{[informal]: be the most remarkable or foolish of its kind}] and then I
will believe such otherwise dishonest Popery."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "Nonsense! Do you
truly think that accusations constitute proof of guilt? If that were
true, why bother with courts and judges and stuff?
People who have been *convicted* of a crime should be punished for it.
To convict someone of a crime takes more than a mere accusation. It
requires proof beyond all reasonable doubt. And that means reasonable
doubt in the minds of the jury who have heard all the evidence for and
against the allegation.
I repeat: accusations aren't proof.
Imagine what the world would be like if accusations /were/ proof. If you
bore a grudge against someone, you could accuse them of a serious crime
and they would immediately be arrested and imprisoned. Or /you/ could be
accused (without foundation, of course), and then /you'd/ be in jail. It
makes no sense at all.
Do not allow the gravity of the crime to blind you to the importance of
due process of law.
I received an email (I won't name names) telling me that, by saying that
accusations aren't proof, I was as guilty as the perpetrators! This
shows a complete ignorance of due process of law.
If the police think that there are reasonable grounds for believing that
there is a case to answer, they will arrest the suspect. Transferring
the suspect elsewhere will therefore not be possible.
In civilised countries such as the UK, there is no statute of
limitations on child abuse, as recent cases have demonstrated."
DOLF: "That was my statement and since the accusations of such perverse
crimes as theirs and of yours were made by a Royal Commission it is you
that are continuing to "show a complete ignorance of the due process of
law" and of the sovereignty of the Crown above that of the Roman
Catholic Church."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "On the contrary, I
have made it very clear that the Crown has sovereignty over the Roman
Catholic Church, by pointing out that the Church does not have the power
to prevent the police from arresting suspects."
DOLF: "Now you either fully retract your statements as being most
improper and a perverse rationale given in support of such offence and
disrespect of the "due process of law" which is the soul and character
of the [obstructionist] Roman Catholic Church and the Popes who have
sought at every turn to frustrate justice."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "I am most certainly
NOT supporting ANY offences at all. On the contrary, I am fully in
favour of the imprisonment of those who have been found guilty of crimes
that merit such imprisonment.
DOLF: "If you attempt to rationalise any further without an
unconditional apology and withdrawal of such offensive statements of
yours, [given such clear evidence of the contrary to which you have an
obligation to inform yourself: 'Perhaps it would be worth finding out
what the /Australian/ press has to say about events in Australia'] then
a complaint will be made to your Internet Service Provider due to you
engaging in unlawful activity as the advocating of pedophile activity."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "If you do so, I will
provide all relevant information to my Internet Service Provider to
demonstrate that I have at all times behaved reasonably and rationally,
and that your complaint is utterly without foundation."
DOLF: "You have one hour to make such a statement and if it does not
occur within that time it will be construed as if you have refused to
make any retraction."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "You can save yourself
the wait. I refuse to retract the perfectly sensible (and perfectly
legal) statements I have made. I don't respond well to threats,
especially threats that have no justification whatsoever.
You have made it clear that you haven't thought this through very clearly."
DOLF: "Have I made myself clear."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "I've received another
email from the same person, threatening to complain to my ISP if I don't
retract my claim that accusations aren't proof.
I don't retract the claim. Accusations are /not/ proof.
My correspondent seems to think that, by saying that accusations aren't
proof, I somehow consider the Roman Catholic Church not to be subject to
the Crown (I think he's in Australia, and I'm in the UK, so the
reference to the Crown is understandable here). Of course, I don't think
any such thing, as I made very clear in an earlier article in this thread.
Let me say it one more time: accusations are not proof.
When someone is accused of a crime, they have the right to defend
themselves against that accusation in a court of law. If the jury
decides that they are not guilty of that crime, then (in law) they are
not guilty of that crime. It's as simple as that. The mere act of
accusing does not mean that the accused is guilty. Nor does it mean that
the accused is not guilty.
If a Roman Catholic priest (or anyone else) is charged with child abuse
and is found guilty by a court of law, then he should be punished
(preferably to the full extent permissible by law). But if he is either
not charged at all, or acquitted by the court, then that's the end of
the matter.
A statistic that 1 in 14 Catholic priests in Australia have been accused
of abuse is mere scandal-mongering. A statistic that 1 in 14 Catholic
priests in Australia have been /convicted/ of abuse would be cause for
very, very serious concern."
DOLF: "You are continuing to make irrational extrapolations and
unreasonable rationalisations against the evidence of factual statements
made by the "Royal Commission Into Institutional Responses" [to
instances of complaints made of pedophilia as unlawful conduct] which
are the accusations of criminal conduct by 7% (but unto 20% within some
religious orders) [of the Roman Catholic clergy] that you have sought to
cast improper aspersions upon. The reason that they could not be
punished to the full extent permissible by law is because just like you,
the Roman Catholic Church considers itself above nature, law and order
as the exercise of fair and equitable justice by any other Sovereign
jurisdiction other than itself.
Despite your denials, you are advocating pedophilia by such wrongful
exclusions. And such conduct is unlawful and complaint will now be made
to your Internet Service Provider."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "No, I'm not. Dolf
Boek has completely misconstrued what I've said. As a result, he is
wasting your time and mine.
An article was posted in alt.christnet.christianlife that drew attention
to a newspaper headline claiming that 1 in 14 Australian Roman Catholic
priests have been accused of child abuse.
I'm not a Roman Catholic, but in the interests of reasonableness I
pointed out that a more meaningful statistic would be the rate of
convictions rather than the rate of accusations.
At no point was I abusive. At no point did I advocate illegal activity.
(Quite the reverse!)
The complaint is an over-reaction. I trust that you will ignore it."
DOLF: "It is noted that by such attributions of italicised signalling
within your apologist commentary, that you engage within pedantry as a
person who is excessively concerned with formalism, accuracy, and
precision, or one who makes an ostentatious and arrogant show of learning.
I repeat again, that the accusations are a statement of fact made by the
Royal Commission and which are supported and sustained by evidence
presented to such.
Therefore you ought as concerning your haughty display of a perverse
pedantic character of a flawed nature, correct your erroneous statements
which cast such improper aspersions upon 'due process of law' as justice
so that it is in accord with those made by the Royal Commission as being
'more meaningful' than your vain opinion."
CATHOLIC SERVANT (COPY CAT TALK) PROPAGANDA: "Indeed, but not by
argument, which is why the Christian witness immediately following the
apostles is so instructive these 2000 years hence.
Which means rejection of all history on any matter right there as well.
The christian witness is as commonly accepted by historical scholars as
for any event/person of the same time period."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "It's a data point,
that's all. It tells us what they believed, but that doesn't mean that
what they believed is /true/. And I certainly don't take it as gospel."
DOLF: "Cease making such a fraudulent and fascist claim that 2000 years
is a justification for the Roman Catholic Church continuing existence as
being substantiated by God.
*I* *demand* *that* *you* *either* *substantiate* *that* *fraud* *or*
*retract* *it* *as* *a* *deliberate* *blasphemy* *and* *falsehood*."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "Sure. And obviously
it is acknowledged to be a problem, and it is clear that the Roman
Catholic denomination must take steps to deal with it honestly and
openly and in accordance with the law.
Churches are magnets for people with problems. Unfortunately, because
Christians tend to be trusting souls, people with problems very often
get into positions of power that they can then abuse (whether sexually,
or by acquiring excessive wealth, or whatever it might be).
It is therefore not just the Roman Catholics who have to put their house
in order, but pretty much all congregations over the whole world.
It is, in my view, unreasonable to single out the Roman Catholic
denomination for attack on these grounds. I am not a Roman Catholic, of
course, but I am firmly against this constant abuse /of/ Roman Catholics
/by/ non-Catholics (just as I am against abuse of anybody by anybody).
Let's acknowledge that there's a problem (many problems, in fact), not
just within the Roman Catholic denomination but also within other
denominations, and let's resolve to deal with those problems, helping
each other towards a solution rather than using the problems as a stick
to beat each other with.
Far too often, this newsgroup is like a children's playground. It's
time for people to start growing up a bit."
DOLF: "We have a justified cause for complaint against the religious
institutions and especially the Roman Catholic Church--of which you are
also an obstructionist to our justice and human rights over which they
luxuriate in their in-humaneness and barbarism as impiety.
I'm firmly against Roman Catholics treasonable abuses of our Sovereign
rights to the free expression of a self identity as the exercise of an
autonomy of will--which is not in slavery to their bad faith as Eucharist.
*There* *are* *just* *too* *many* *Roman* *Catholic* (et al) *lawyers*
*and* *judges* *within* *this* *country* *and* *it* *is* *not*
*possible* *to* *obtain* *fair* *and* *equitable* *justice*.
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING" and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[IOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[IOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE.
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS."
MATTB: "What should be done to a Church when it is proven they helped a
priest [such as the Archbishop (now Cardinal) George Pell] cover up such
crimes? That or intentionally moved said priest around to prevent
prosecution [and he won't voluntarily come back to face such an
indictment]?"
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "That's called 'being
an accessory after the fact', and it's a criminal offence in its own
right. It should be prosecuted as such."
MATTB: "How do you prosecute them?"
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "In the UK at least,
it would be done like this: the police would track down the individuals
responsible for assisting the criminal. Then, if they decide that they
have enough evidence for a reasonable chance of conviction, they will
send the file to the Crown Prosecution Service, in whose hands the final
decision rests about whether to prosecute.
Of course, as it's very likely to end up in the Crown Court (and
therefore before a jury) they can't actually guarantee a conviction.
The point is this: crimes are not committed by organisations - not even
churches. Crimes are committed by people. So the right people to punish
are the individuals who commit the crimes (and that certainly includes
those who order other people to commit crimes, as that is also against
the law - it's called 'incitement')."
DOLF: "That fascist apologist RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD refuses to
answer [the] reply to his immoral claim of [others] having no just cause."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "If you've posted this
in any newsgroup, it counts as publication and is therefore libelous and
actionable (which means I could sue you, and I'd win).
I'm not going to sue you, because I really don't think you're being
malicious. You're just stupid. So, instead, I'm going to kill-file you.
Any further emails that you send to me will go straight in[to] the bin,
without my reading them."
DOLF: "It is not liable [for libel] at all. And is a remark which I can
[reasonably and rationally] make against you because it is sustainable
by factual [and prudent] evidence of which you [already] have in your
possession.
Are you the Fuehrer or is there someone else who is the [principle]
architect of your tawdry [accusation] that our justified claims [made]
against religious institutions such as the Roman Catholic Church
constitute an unfair impunity against them and [that] they ought not
immediately pay compensation to the unfortunate impoverished souls
[which] they continue to callously malign in any manner possible.
And not continue your contrary *WHIFFER* {ie. a person who frequently
shifts opinions, attitudes, interests etc; a person who is vacillating
or evasive in an argument; Courtesy: Word of the Day for 10 February,
2017; www.dictionary.com} as whimsical apologist fantasy that ignores
such treasonable crimes against humanity as war crimes perpetrated by
the Roman Catholic Church as being the constitutional disrespect of the
rights of the Sovereign Crown both here and in the United Kingdom which
you are also subtly making.
I caution you however, to carefully read the evidence already patiently
given to you and recommend against you[r] making any further apologist
or rancorous statements, lest they be construed as TREASON[ABLE] and you
forfeit either your liberty or life.
Have I made myself clear?"
ROBERT: "Of course. Isn't that what we've been trying to say in this
instance?"
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "Have we been reading
the same newsgroup? These accusations have been used as a stick with
which to beat the Roman Catholic denomination. That's not helpful,
because it's premature."
ROBERT: "You know, that all sounds good, but in the case of this
particular thread all I saw was fairness. No condemnation, just praise
for the guy doing what is right."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "I was talking about
the reactions *in this newsgroup*, some of which have been unthinkingly
hostile."
ROBERT: "It appears to me that all the defenders of the 'faith' and
others jumped in here and assumed what was not presented by MATTB, at
all. They want tit for tat, but they were operating under a false
conception."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "Lots of people do that."
ROBERT: "Had anyone read or followed the link they could have seen it
for what it was."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "Oh, I never (or, at
least, only very rarely) follow links like that. This is a newsgroup,
not a Web portal. If someone has something to say, they can damn well
say it here."
ROBERT: "Even you asked about how many had actually been convicted of a
crime, and that was out of place given the actions of AU, the nature of
the article, and the initial reply by me."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "Yes. This was to draw
attention to the fact that (if I'm right in my interpretation of events
from what has been posted about them here) the number of convictions is
ZERO. Is that correct?
I don't think so. I was batting, in at least one case, against a guy who
would have strung up all the priests concerned and possibly their
*mothers* as well. I thought it was important to point out that
accusations are not convictions."
ROBERT: "Who did that?"
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "Some guy called Dolf
Boek. He's in my kill-file, so I only caught his replies because he
copied them to me by email, but I learned that he was posting them here
as well. (I have since added to my email kill-file, too, as he was
getting very tiresome.)"
ROBERT: "I'm sorry, but I was talking about this thread and the
O[riginal] P[ost] which somehow appears to have been twisted and woven
into all the others you speak of."
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "You're quite right -
I seem to have become cross-threaded. Sorry!"
DOLF: "Your statements either stand as [a] principle of truth [in] being
no different to case law--or they are half truth's which fail the test
of veracity when nuanced by the prism of truth as truth.
Or they are no truth at all [in being] just artifices without [any]
accountability, whose only substance is a sensualis[tic] reliance upon
the act of defecation."
ROBERT: "No, that was your cherry picking that distorts things. You are
hell bent on proving something that no one is denying.
What is the matter? YOU not getting the pound of flesh you think you
deserve?
MATTB has on more than one occasion pointed out that child molestation
by anyone is blatantly sinful, as have I. But all you and your cronies
care about is some kind of equality of guilt, we aren't guilty, we do
not condone it no matter who does it.
Your try tit for tat for equality of sin and evil will never satisfy
your need for a bound of flesh.
And you should be condoning what the archbishop [h]as said and support
his actions for repair if any are forthcoming out of all this.
Meanwhile I grow weary with your childish ways."
CATHOLIC SERVANT (COPY CAT TALK) PROPAGANDA: "This protestant expert on
child abuse in protestant groups makes the *complete* picture.
In light of his work protecting children the anti Roman Catholic Church
bashing threads has finally some balance.
To say we need to consider the *whole* picture is not to excuse the
abuse in any part of it over any other part.
I do understand pulling back the veil of ignorance that it is not only a
Roman Catholic Church problem removes a familiar crud-gal from the haters.
As other posters have said, knowing the *whole* picture should be reason
for cooperation.
DOLF: "Our hate is not without substantial righteous cause, it's pure as
justified motive and not intentional upon maleficence as a
faux-sanctified piety as unlike that love which is your sycophancy."
DOLF: "Our hate is not without substantial righteous cause, it's pure as
justified motive and not intentional upon maleficence as a
faux-sanctified piety as unlike that love which is your sycophancy."
ROY MOCK: "Yea. Verily.
What sayest, thou, of the 400 year gap in Christian history?"
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "I don't give a damn
about the 400 year gap, or lack of a gap, or whatever it might be. What
matters is what God wants. And God certainly doesn't want these
pointless, stupid, divisive arguments."
ROY MOCK: "I understand.
What, then, is the place of the doctrine of the Holy Trinity in
Christianity?"
RICHARD [GAINSAYER] HEATHFIELD (***@CPAX.ORG.UK): "My understanding of
the Holy Trinity's doctrine can be summed up in one word: love.
Ask the Father what His doctrine is, and He will answer: love.
Ask the Son what His doctrine is, and He will answer: love.
Ask the Spirit what His doctrine is, and He will answer: love.
Love, love, love. Not fight, fight, fight. Not bitch, bitch, bitch. Not
accuse, accuse, accuse. But love, love, love.
Love, love, and love, but the greatest of these is love.
I don't know of any way that I can make this any clearer."
DOLF: "THE GODLESS BABYLONIAN WHORE WANTS TO TELL US ABOUT LOVE:
Why does your definition of love not exclude anal penetration of
children by Catholic priests?
If there were no such crimes committed by Catholic priests then why have
they paid over $250 million in compensation?
The Catholic Church in Australia paid A$276 million ($212.9 million) in
compensation, treatment and other costs to thousands of victims of child
sexual offences in the past 35 years, according to a report released on
Thursday at an inquiry into institutional abuse.
The barrister prosecuting on behalf of the government established Royal
Commission, Gail Furness, said in the report there was an average delay
of 33 years between an alleged abuse and claim made against the church.
"The Royal Commission's experience is that many survivors face barriers
which deter them from reporting abuse to authorities and to the
institution in which the abuse occurred," Furness said.
A Royal Commission is Australia's most powerful type of inquiry that is
able to compel people to testify and recommend legislative changes and
criminal charges. The current inquiry was established in 2013 and is
investigating child sexual abuse in religious, government and sporting
organizations, among others.
Compensation and other payments were made in response to 3,066 of 4,445
child sexual abuse claims between 1980 and 2015, the report found. More
than 40 percent of claims were received by a handful of male orders.
The current set of hearings, focused on the Catholic Church, previously
heard that 7 percent of priests working in Australia between 1950 and
2010 were accused of child sex crimes, but few were pursued.
The report was based on analysis of data kept by Catholic Church
authorities. Last year, Australia's most senior Catholic, Cardinal
George Pell said the church had made "enormous mistakes" and
"catastrophic" choices by refusing to believe abused children, shuffling
abusive priests from parish to parish and over-relying on counselling of
priests to solve the problem."
- http://www.reuters.com/article/us-australia-abuse-idUSKBN15V046
There was never love from you as a godless whore of Babylon:
HEAVEN (H27) + EARTH (H9) +/= MAN (#36) as #666 is an encapsulation of
Roman Catholic Religious Belief.
You have the wrong end of the stick in that it's you religionists such
as Roman Catholics who are deprived of any rational mind.
There are faggots out there who are at war for their human rights and
you are going to lose because they are intent on annihilating your mind,
body and soul in any way that they can.
They're not wanting to take any prisoners, but rather to leave you
bereft of vital life like zombies.
I have in the past, even given such cursory universal observations which
are independent of gender and sexual identity as summarily proclaimed
but not exhaustively made of the sexual act. Been accused of over
intellectualising how people engage their wants within this physical act
which is always a quantification as:
#1 - a degree of avaricious want;
#2 - the potential of limitations upon reality;
#3 - a capability to beguile and stupefy with words, the quarry sought
as the object of virile necessity;
#4 - variance of acceptability as the cause for improbability;
#5 - the permissibility of idealisations;
#6 - the organisational readiness to eliminate any inhibitors to the
physical dynamics of opportunity;
#7 - to facilitate a sporting prowess of a proud accomplishment in a
mutually satisfying purposed delivery; and
#8 - a job well done, always wants more.
Although some have more succinctly surmised as nothing more than a ***@ck
you and then onto the next, until you run out of opportunities.
But I put forward the counter proposition, that it takes a considerable
effort to garnish such salient observations which are not stereotypical
of one act over any other. And to arrive at such universality, one must
needs be, without prejudice, adopt various perspectives of predilection:
whether of dominance, submissiveness, functional role, modality and its
purposed, unintentional and consequential action. As that which can
significantly challenge one's limits of acceptability as normality.
That I have as a composite anti-terrorism initiative sought to challenge
religious dogma (ie. whether belief, dis-belief or non-belief)
associated to same-sex marriage and which collectively finds its impetus
within the encapsulation of mind, body and soul as articulated by the
faux-wisdom as Pythagorean sophistry which deploys a binary (ie. gender
and spermatic bifurcated attribution) paradigm as a transformative
prototype within its HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER:
MIND: {#1 + #2 = #3} +
SCIENCE: {#3 + #4 = #7} +
OPINION: {#5 + #6 = #11} +
SENSE: {#7 + #8 = #15} = #36 (ie. H27 - Realm of its Nature as Heaven -
Formula of Universal Law + H9 - System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of
Humanity)
'I *swear* by him who the TETRAKTYS (#10) found,
Whence all our wisdom springs and which contains
Perennial Nature's fountain, cause and root.'
And whilst this encompasses a broad spectrum of opposition which is
usually conveyed in varying degrees of acceptance, permissiveness,
toleration and equitability. And in considering the existentialist
theories of sexual attraction like that of mesmerism, may find it’s
validation as authenticity within a knowledge source of ignorance,
distorted realities, delusion or some other natural biological theories.
It is an indisputable fact, that in the circumstance of extremism,
whether religious based or not, that this opposition is more likely to
be the most adversely pronounced in being unreasonable, intolerant,
hostile and violent.
It is futile as an attempt to overcome this irrational opposition from
any perspective which is exclusively dependent upon semantical argument,
hypothetical scenarios or fictional realities. One must have recourse
to factuality as circumspection which draws upon a wide spectrum of real
(ie. whether good or bad, happy or sad is immaterial) experience which
is sustained by an encapsulation of mind, body and soul as articulated
by an alternative HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER and that is capable of
sustaining sexual dynamics without exhibiting modal incongruities which
are indulgently capable of impugning the autonomy of will that is
intrinsic to sexual identity."
"Do not think that I will accuse you to the father: there is one that
accuseth you, even Moses {taken out; drawn forth}, in whom ye trust.
For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of
me. But if believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words?"
[John 5:44-47]
#4400 MOD 22 = 11 [#KAF / #20 - Shem {Exhalted Name, Name, renown}] =
#400 CE
#4800 MOD 22 = 6 [#VAV / #6 - Jared {Descent/A ruling; commanding;
coming down}] = #800 CE
#5200 MOD 22 = 1 [#ALEPH / #1 - Adam {Taken from 4 corners, Earthy;
red}] = #1200 CE
#5600 MOD 22 = 18 [#TSADE / #90 - Nahor {Snorting, Hoarse; dry; hot}] =
#1600 CE
#6000 MOD 22 = 13 [#MEM / #40 - Shelah {Sprout/That breaks; that unties;
that undresses}
As waters, peoples, nations, languages and tongues; the spring of Torah
being the source of knowledge and wisdom] = #2000 Y2K / Equinox of
Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * 364) + 182 days = Wednesday
DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the
Sabbath year of 'oth cycle

- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indT2h5MFJxblJaT2M
"And as touching the dead, that they rise: have ye not read in the book
of Moses, how in the bush spake unto him, saying I [am] the God of
Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob?" [Mark 12:36 (KJV)]
#6400 MOD 22 = 8 [#CHET / #8 - Methuselah {Man of the dart/javelin
(weapon, missile, sprout), He has sent his death}]
#6800 MOD 22 = 3 [#GIMEL / #3 - Enosh {Husband, (certain, mortal) man;
sick; despaired of; forgetful}]
#7200 MOD 22 = 20 [#RESH / #200 - Abraham {Father of a multitude, chief
of multitude}]
#7600 MOD 22 = 15 [#SAMEK / #60 - Peleg {Division}]
#8000 MOD 22 = 10 [#YOD / #10 - Noah {Rest, Repose; consolation}]
#8400 MOD 22 = 5 [#HE / #5 - Mahalalel {Praise (fame) of God}]
#8800 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400 - Jacob {He takes by the heel, he
supplants, That supplants, undermines; the heel}] as 8800 CE
THAT THE PYTHAGOREAN TETRAD IS SOPHISTIC OPINION WHICH HAS GIVEN RISE TO
THE HETEROS [BABYLONIAN] THEORY ON NUMBER, IS ITSELF DEFINED BY THIS
MICROCOSM [1-5-6-7-2-3-4-8-9] AS BEING THEN ASSOCIATED TO THE ORDER OF
THE SEPTET PHENOMENAL MACROCOSM AS THE PROGRESSION OF MAGIC SQUARES:
"And there came one of the seven angels which had the seven vials, and
talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will show unto thee the
judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters: With whom the
kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of
the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication.
So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a
woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy,
having seven heads and ten horns. And the woman was arrayed in *PURPLE*
*AND* *SCARLET* *COLOUR*, and decked with gold and precious stones and
pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and
filthiness of her fornication:
And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT,
THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.
And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the
blood of the martyrs of Jesus: and when I saw her, I wondered with great
admiration. And the angel said unto me, Wherefore didst thou marvel? I
will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast that carrieth
her, which hath the seven heads {ie. as the supposition of a septet
cosmogony principle: {1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64} giving rise to an
encapsulated [1-5-6-7-2-3-4-8-9] metaphysical microcosm within the
phenomenal septet macrocosm: #15 (9) ... #34 (16) ... #65 (25) ... #111
(36) ... #175 (49) ... #260 (64 as I CHING's meta-descriptor prototypes)
... #369 (81 as DAO TE CHING's meta-descriptor prototypes) of magic
squares} and ten {ie. as the canon of transposition from the ternary
HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER to the binary HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER with its
sovereign/marriage dynamic} horns.
The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the
bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth
shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the
foundation of the world {ie.
specifically negate this historical sovereign/marriage dynamic dogmatic
prospective by the attribution of the magic square centre: #3x3 = #123
consideration (which can be readily discerned from antiquity) and by
then making a sub-category of understanding association of many internal
date correspondence with key historical date mappings or date of the
year and from this process is obtained both the terror events of 11
September 2001 and the central #41 - Genesis Reprise upon 13 to 17
September 2001
}, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.
And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven
mountains, on which the woman sitteth.
And there are seven kings: five are fallen {ie. Roman Julio-Claudia
Dynasty (27 BCE to 68CE) of Caesars}, and one is, and the other is not
yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth {ie. the
Pythagorean Intellectual Tetrad is a sophistic opinion as faux wisdom
which comprises 8 elements:
MIND: {1 + 2 = #3} +
SCIENCE: {3 + 4 = #7} +
OPINION: {5 + 6 = #11} +
SENSE: {7 + 8 = #15} = #36 (ie. H27 - Realm of its Nature as Heaven -
Formula of Universal Law + H9 - System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of
Humanity)
}, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition. And the ten horns
which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet;
but receive power as kings one hour with the beast. These have one
mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast.
These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them:
for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him
are called, and chosen, and faithful.
And he saith unto me, The waters which thou sawest, where the whore
sitteth, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues.
And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the beast, these shall hate the
whore, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh,
and burn her with fire.
For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and
give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be
fulfilled. And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which
reigneth over the kings of the earth." [Revelation 17:1-18 (KJV)]
TETRAD - #2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {BETH (DOUBLE - #1 - NATURE
CONTAINS NATURE {#4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE}) / CHERUBIM (Gk.
Cheroubim - a cherub or imaginary figures which covered the mercy seat
to the Ark of the Covenant [Exodus 25:17-22] and from where God communed
with Israel)}
{ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA {#1 + #2 + #3 + #4 = #10}
#1 - MONAD (MATTER as World of Emanation - ATZILUTH) as 3 MOTHER LETTERS
expressing by logical syllogism the following meta-principles as TRIAD
prototypes:
- PURPLE FORBIDDEN ENCLOSURE (紫微垣) / MONAD - #1 - NATURE CONTAINS
NATURE: {ALEPH (*MOTHER* - SCALES OF MERIT) / SERAPHIM (Heb. Saraph Gk.
Ophis - burning, that is, (figuratively) poisonous (serpent);
specifically a fiery (serpent) or symbolical creature (from their copper
color))}
Northern Pole (北極 - Běijí)
Four Advisors (四輔 - Sìfǔ)
Right Wall (紫微左垣 - Zǐwēiyòuyuán)
Chief Judge (大理 - Dàlǐ)
Six Jia (六甲 - Liùjiá)
Canopy Support (杠 - Gāng)
Guest House (傳舍 - Chuánshě)
Eight Kinds of Crops (八穀 - Bāgǔ)
Celestial Boat (天船 - Tiānchuán) and the Stomach (胃宿 as Wèi Xiù -
Stomach, fingers and granary/Aries) is one of the twenty-eight mansions
of the Chinese constellations and was associated with White Tiger of the
West (西方白虎).
22/7 as 3W1D ...
THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *courses* *of*
*priests* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated
to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day
intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days
"And God spake all these words, saying, 'I am the LORD thy God, which
have brought thee out of the land of Egypt {that troubles or oppresses;
anguish}, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods
before me..." [Exodus 20:1-3 (KJV)]
And whereas We did on the 17th day of September, 1900, by and with the
advice of Our Privy Council declare by proclamation that, on and after
the 1st day of January, 1901, the people of New South Wales, Victoria,
South Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania and also Western Australia,
should be united in a Federal Commonwealth of Australia: And whereas by
the said recited Act certain *POWERS*, *FUNCTIONS*, *and* *AUTHORITIES*
*were* *declared* to be vested in the Governor General: And whereas We
are *desirous* *of* *making* *effectual* *and* *permanent* *provision*
for the office of Governor General and Commander in chief in and over
Our said Commonwealth of Australia, without making new Letters Patent on
each demise of the said office. *Now* *know* *ye* *that* *We* *have*
*thought* *fit* *to* *constitute*, *ORDER*, *and* *DECLARE*, *and* *do*
*by* *these* *PRESENTS* *CONSTITUTE* *ORDER*, *and* *DECLARE*, that
there shall be a Governor General and *Commander* *in* *Chief*
(hereinafter called the Governor General) in and over Our Commonwealth
of Australia (hereinafter called Our said Commonwealth), and that the
person who shall fill the said office of *Governor* *General* *shall*
*be* *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME* *APPOINTED* by Commission under Our Sign
Manual and Signet.
It was said that the white tiger (western mansions) would only appear
when the emperor ruled with absolute virtue, or if there was peace
throughout the world)
- SUPREME PALACE ENCLOSURE (太微垣) / DUAD - #13 - *NATURE* *CONTAINS*
*NATURE*: {MEM / *MOTHER* - *THE* *TONGUE* *OF* *DECREE* *DECIDING*
*BETWEEN* *THEM*: 10 paragraphs of the Letters Patent of the Australian
Constitution 1 January 1901}
THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the
law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or
294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20
March 1996 / 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;
AS BEING A LOGICAL GROUNDING OF INFINITY;
"... Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the
LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon
the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my
commandments..." [Exodus 20:5-6 (KJV)]
I - And *we* *do* *hereby* *authorize* *and* *command* *Our* *said*
*Governor* *General* *to* *do* *and* *execute*, *in* *due* *manner*,
*all* *things* *that* *shall* *belong* *to* *his* *said* *command*,
*and* *to* *the* *trust* *We* *have* *reposed* *in* *him*, *according*
*to* *the* *several* *POWER* and *AUTHORITIES* *granted* *or*
*APPOINTED* *him* *by* *VIRTUE* of 'The Commonwealth of Australia
Constitution Act, 1900', *and* *of* *these* *present* *Letters* *Patent*
and of such Commission as may be issued to him under Our Sign Manual and
Signet, or by Order in Our Privy Council, or by Us through one of Our
Principal Secretaries of State, and to such laws as shall hereafter be
in *FORCE* in Our said Commonwealth.
- HEAVENLY MARKET ENCLOSURE (天市垣) / TRIAD - #21 - *AUTONOMOUS* *NATURE*:
{SHIN / *MOTHER* - *SCALES* *OF* *LIABILITY*: bequeathed in perpetuity
to its sovereign descendants)
THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of Autonomy},
which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as right in the
case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41
centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.
AS BEING A SUBJECTIVE GROUNDING OF INFINITY AS ETERNITY.
"...Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the
LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus
20:7 (KJV)]
IX - And We do hereby *reserve* *to* *Ourselves* *Our* *heirs* *and*
*SUCCESSORS*, *FULL* *POWER* *AND* *AUTHORITY* *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*
*TO* *REVOKE*, *ALTER*, *OR* *AMEND* *these* *Our* *Letters* *Patent*,
*as* *to* Us or *THEM* *SHALL* *SEEM* *MEET*.
CHANGE TO:
IX - And we do hereby reserve to the Lieutenant Governor as Speaker of
the Council, together in a Council comprising 8 Senate Ministers, 8
House of Representative Ministers and 8 Judicial members, from each
State appointed by the Governor General, who are given full power and
authority from time to time to revoke, alter, or amend these our Letters
Patent, as to us or them shall seem meet.
----------
#2 - DUAD (FORM as World of Creation - BRIYAH) as 7 DOUBLE expressing
the essential meta-principles as the SEPTET prototypes:
TETRAD - #2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {BETH (DOUBLE - #1 - NATURE
CONTAINS NATURE {#4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE}) / CHERUBIM (Gk.
Cheroubim - a cherub or imaginary figures which covered the mercy seat
to the Ark of the Covenant [Exodus 25:17-22] and from where God communed
with Israel)}
PENTAD - #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {GIMEL (DOUBLE - #2 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE {#5 - ACT OF NATURE}) / THRONES (Gk. Thronos - a
stately seat; by implication power or (concretely) a potentate:--seat,
throne)}
HEXAD - #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE / #1 - NATURE CONTAINS NATURE:
{DALETH (DOUBLE - #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE {#6 - FORM OF NATURE}) /
*DOMINIONS* (Gk. Kuriotes - *MASTERY*, that is, (concretely and
collectively) rulers:--dominion, government)}
HEPTAD - #11 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE {KAF (DOUBLE - #4 - NATURE
AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: {#7 - ENGENDERING NATURE}) / Government &
Non-Government Organisations}
OGDOAD - #17 / #5 - ACT OF NATURE: {PE / DOUBLE - #5 - ACT OF NATURE (#8
- TRANSFORMING NATURE)}
ENNEAD - #20 / #8 - TRANSFORMING NATURE: {RESH / DOUBLE - #6 - FORM OF
NATURE (#9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE)}
VIII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *REQUIRE* *and* *COMMAND* *ALL* *OUR*
*OFFICERS* *AND* *MINISTERS*, *CIVIL* *AND* *MILITARY*, *AND* *ALL*
*OTHER* *THE* *INHABITANTS* of Our said Commonwealth *TO* *BE*
*OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, *AND* *ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General,
or, *in* *the* *event* *of* *his* death, *INCAPACITY*, or absence, to
such person or persons as may, *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME*, *under* *the*
*PROVISIONS* *OF* *THESE* *OUR* *LETTERS* *PATENT*, *ADMINISTER* *THE*
*GOVERNMENT* of Our said Commonwealth.
DECAD - #22 / #10 - *TOTALITY* *OF* *NATURE*: {TAU / DOUBLE - #9 -
ENGENDERING NATURE (TOTALITY OF NATURE)}
X - And We do *further* *direct* *and* *enjoin* *that* *these* *Our*
*Letters* *Patent* *shall* *be* *read* *and* *proclaimed* *at* *such*
*place* *or* *places* *as* Our said Governor General *shall* *think*
*fit* within Our said Commonwealth of Australia.
-----------
#3 - TRIAD (POTENCY as World of Formation - YETZIRAH) as 12 SINGLE
LETTERS expressing the essential meta-principles as the 4 x 3 = #12
quadrant prototypes:
The trigrams therefore have correspondences in astronomy, astrology,
geography, geomancy, anatomy, the family, and elsewhere. There are two
possible sources of bagua. The first is from traditional Yin and Yang
philosophy. This is explained by Fuxi in the following way:

- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indamdsc1I5b00zWHc
The first phase is where the limitless (無極; wuji) produces the delimited
(有極; youji), and this demarcation is equivalent to the Absolute (太極;
taiji) as the infinite void/nothingness (Ain Sof - Infinite Being) of
the Primordial Source. The second phase is when the Taiji (the two
opposing forces in embryonic form) then produces two forms, named yin
(Female)-yang (Male) (陰陽) which are called Liangyi (the manifested
opposing forces). The third phase occurs when these two forms produce
four phenomena (四象; Sìxiàng): named lesser yin (少陰, shaoyin), greater
yin (太陰; taiyin, which also refers to the Moon), lesser yang (少陽,
shaoyang), and greater yang (太陽; taiyang, which also refers to the Sun).
The four phenomena (四象; Sìxiàng) act on the eight trigrams (八卦;
Bagua). Eight 'eights' results in sixty-four hexagrams.'
Or, in other words: 'Changes originate in the Ultimate; from the
Ultimate issue the two spheres. From the two spheres issue the four
elements, and from the four elements the eight diagrams' (from the book
Zhou Yi, 周易 (I Ching, 易經, The Book of Changes). That was the basic
theory of the Ultimate, giving rise to the eight diagrams. By the
Ultimate, the ancient meant the origin of all things and creatures. The
two spheres refer to heaven and earth, or yin (feminine, negative) and
yang (masculine, positive). The four elements are metal, wood, water and
fire, which are omnipresent. The eight diagrams symbolize the eight
natural phenomena: sky, earth, thunder, wind, water, fire, mountain and
lake. So, the picture represented the ancient Chinese early knowledge of
the universe.
FOUR MALE SYMBOLS (四象) OF SIGNS (OF HEAVENS, APPROVAL, ETC) AS ADVISORS
(四輔 - SÌFǓ) UPON THE CHARIOTS OF TWENTY-EIGHT LUNAR MANSiONS
- East – Azure Dragon (青龍)
- South – Vermilion Bird (朱雀)
- West – White Tiger (白虎)
- North – Black Tortoise (玄武)
- Center – Yellow Dragon (黃龍) Earth AND THE HIEROS LOGOS AS THE FAUX
LOGICAL GROUNDING OF INFINITY
They can be considered as the equivalent to the zodiacal constellations
in Western astronomy, though the Twenty-eight Mansions reflect the
movement of the Moon through a sidereal month rather than the Sun within
a tropical year.
As it is written within the Scriptures of the elect, so as to be a help
within a time of necessity: "In this manner the year is completed
scrupulously in three hundred sixty-four [#364 days as the] fixed
stations of the cosmos. Thus the signs, durations of time, the years,
and the days were shown to me by the angel Uriel, whom the Lord, God of
eternal glory, has appointed over the luminaries of heaven--(both) in
heaven and the world--in order that they--the sun, the moon, the stars,
and all the created objects which circulate in all the *CHARIOTS* of
heaven--should rule in the face of the sky and be seen on the earth to
be guides for the day and the night. Likewise Uriel showed me twelve wide
openings in the sky, along the course of the chariots of the sun, from
which" the rays of the sun break out and from which heat is diffused
upon the earth, when they are opened during the designated seasons.
- EAST (SPRING/WOOD AS #7 - ENGENDERING NATURE) – AZURE DRAGON (青龍): #1
- Horn (角 - Jiăo), #2 - Neck (亢 - Kàng), #3 - Root (氐 - Dĭ), #4 - Room
(房 - Fáng), #5 - Heart (心 - Xīn), #6 - Tail (尾- Wěi), #7 - Winnowing
Basket (箕 - Jī)
JUDAH {THE PRAISE OF THE LORD; CONFESSION} #5 - ACT OF NATURE / #2 -
NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {HE / *VIRTUES* (Gk. Arete - excellence
(intrinsic or attributed):--praise, virtue)}
ISSACHAR {REWARD; RECOMPENSE} #6 - FORM OF NATURE / #3 - NATURE
SURMOUNTS NATURE: {VAV / *POWERS* (Gk. Arche - a commencement, or
(concrete) *chief* (*in* *various* *applications* *of* *order*, *time*,
*place* *or* *rank*):--beginning, corner, (at the, the) first (estate),
*magistrate*, power, principality, principle, rule)}
ZEBULUN {DWELLING; HABITATION} #7 - ENGENDERING NATURE / #4 - NATURE
AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: {ZAYIN / *PRINCIPALITIES* (Gk. Exousia - (in the
sense of ability); privilege, that is, (subjectively) *force*, capacity,
competency, freedom, or (objectively) *MASTERY* (concretely magistrate,
superhuman, potentate, *token* *of* *control*), delegated
influence:--authority, jurisdiction, liberty, power, right, strength)}
- SOUTH (SUMMER/FIRE AS #9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE) – VERMILION BIRD (朱雀):
#22 - Well (井 - Jǐng), #23 - Ghost (鬼 - Guǐ), #24 - Willow (柳 - Liǔ),
#25 - Star (星 - Xīng), #26 - Extended Net - (張 - Zhāng) Wings (翼 - Yì),
#28 - Chariot (軫 - Zhěn)
REUBEN {WHO SEES THE SON; THE VISION OF THE SON} #8 - TRANSFORMING
NATURE / #5 - ACT OF NATURE: {CHETH / ARCHANGELS (Gk. Archaggelos - a
chief angel)}
SIMEON {THAT HEARS OR OBEYS; THAT IS HEARD} #9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE / #4
- FORM OF NATURE: {TETH / ANGELS (Gk. Aggelos - a messenger; especially
an 'angel'; by implication a church pastor or ecclesiastic)}
GAD {A BAND; A TROOP} #10 - TOTALITY OF NATURE / #7 - ENGENDERING
NATURE: {YOD / Sovereignty}
- WEST (AUTUMN/METAL AS #3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE) – WHITE TIGER
(白虎): #15 (3x3 = 9 as #15) - Legs (奎 - Kuí), #16 (4x4 = 16 as #34) -
Bond (婁 - Lóu), #17 (5x5 = 25 as #65) - Stomach (胃 - Wèi), #18 (6x6 = 36
as #111) - Hairy Head (昴 - Mǎo), #19 (7x7 = 49 as #175) - Net (畢 - Bì),
#20 (8x8 = 64 as #260) - Turtle Beak (觜 - Zī), #21 (9x9 = 81 as #369) -
Three Stars (參 - Shēn)
EPHRAIM {FRUITFUL; INCREASING} #12= #9 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE: {LAMED /
General Populace}
And whereas We did on the 17th day of September, 1900, by and with the
advice of Our Privy Council declare by proclamation that, on and after
the 1st day of January, 1901, the people of New South Wales, Victoria,
South Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania and also Western Australia,
should be united in a Federal Commonwealth of Australia: And whereas by
the said recited Act certain *POWERS*, *FUNCTIONS*, *and* *AUTHORITIES*
*were* *declared* to be vested in the Governor General: And whereas We
are *desirous* *of* *making* *effectual* *and* *permanent* *provision*
for the office of Governor General and Commander in chief in and over
Our said Commonwealth of Australia, without making new Letters Patent on
each demise of the said office. *Now* *know* *ye* *that* *We* *have*
*thought* *fit* *to* *constitute*, *ORDER*, *and* *DECLARE*, *and* *do*
*by* *these* *PRESENTS* *CONSTITUTE* *ORDER*, *and* *DECLARE*, that
there shall be a Governor General and *Commander* *in* *Chief*
(hereinafter called the Governor General) in and over Our Commonwealth
of Australia (hereinafter called Our said Commonwealth), and that the
person who shall fill the said office of *Governor* *General* *shall*
*be* *FROM* *TIME* *TO* *TIME* *APPOINTED* by Commission under Our Sign
Manual and Signet.
MANASSEH {FORGETFULNESS; HE THAT IS FORGOTTEN} #14 = #2 - NATURE
REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: {NUN}
II - There shall be a Great Seal of and for Our said Commonwealth which
Our said Governor General shall keep and use for sealing all things
whatsoever that shall pass the said Great Seal. Provided that *until*
*a* *Great* *Seal* *shall* *be* *provided* *the* *Private* *Seal* *of*
*Our* *said* *Governor* *General* *may* *be* *used* *as* *the* *Great*
*Seal* of the Commonwealth of Australia.
BENJAMIN {SON OF THE RIGHT HAND} #15 =#3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE: {SAMEK}
III - The Governor General *may* *constitute* *and* *APPOINT*, in Our
name and on Our behalf, all such *Judges*, *Commissioners*, *Justices*
*of* *the* *Peace*, *and* *other* *necessary* *officers* *and*
*Ministers* of Our said Commonwealth, as may be lawfully constituted or
APPOINTED by Us.
- NORTH (WINTER/WATER AS #1 - NATURE CONTAINS NATURE) – BLACK TORTOISE
(玄武): #8 - Dipper (斗 - Dǒu), #9 - Ox (牛 - ), #10 - Girl (女 - Nǚ), #11 -
Emptiness (虛 - Xū), #12 - Rooftop (危 - Wēi), #13 - Encampment (室 - Shì),
#14 - Wall (壁 - Bì)
DAN {JUDGMENT; HE THAT JUDGES} #16 = #4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE:
{AYIN}
IV - The Governor General, *so* *far* *as* *We* *Ourselves* *lawfully*
*may*, *upon* *sufficient* *cause* *to* *him* *appearing*, *may*
*remove* *from* *his* *office*, *or* *suspend* *from* *the* *exercise*
*of* *the* *same*, *any* *person* *exercising* *any* *office* of Our
said Commonwealth, under or by *VIRTUE* *OF* *ANY*--Commission or
Warrant granted, *or* *which* *may* *be* *granted*, *by* *Us* *in* *Our*
*name* *or* *under* *Our* *authority*.
ASHER {HAPPINESS} #18 = #6 - FORM OF NATURE: {TSADE}
VI - And whereas by 'The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act
1900,' it is amongst other things enacted, that we may authorise the
Governor General to APPOINT any person or persons, jointly or severally,
to be his Deputy or Deputies within any part of Our Commonwealth, *and*
*in* *that* *capacity* *to* *exercise*, during the pleasure of the
Governor General *such* *POWERS*, *and* *FUNCTIONS* of the said Governor
General as he thinks fit to assign to such Deputy or Deputies, subject
to any *LIMITATIONS* and directions as aforesaid, to APPOINT any person
or persons, jointly or severally. To be his Deputy or Deputies within
any part of Our said Commonwealth of Australia, and in that capacity to
exercise, during his pleasure, *such* *of* *his* *POWERS* *and*
*FUNCTIONS*, *as* *he* *may* *deem* *it* *necessary *or* *expedient*
*to* *assign* to him or them: *Provided* *always*, *that* the
APPOINTMENT of such a Deputy or Deputies *shall* *not* *affect* *the*
*exercise* *by* *the* *Governor* *General* *himself* *of* *any* *POWER*
*or* *FUNCTION*.
NAPHTALI { THAT STRUGGLES OR FIGHTS} #19 = #7 - ENGENDERING NATURE:
{QOPH - *OATHS* OF DIEU ET MON DROIT}
VII - And *We* *do* *hereby* *declare* *Our* *pleasure* *to* *be*
*that*, *in* *the* *event* of death, *INCAPACITY*, removal, or absence
of Our said Governor General out of Our said Commonwealth, *and* *all*
*and* *EVERY* *THE* *POWERS* *AND* *AUTHORITIES* herein granted to him
shall until Our further pleasure is signified therein, be vested in such
person as may be APPOINTED by Us under Our Sign Manual and Signet to be
Our Lieutenant Governor of Our said Commonwealth: or if there shall be
no such Lieutenant Governor in Our said Commonwealth, then in such
person or persons as may be APPOINTED by Us under Our Sign Manual and
Signet to administer the Government of the same. *No* *SUCH* *POWERS*
*OR* *AUTHORITIES* *SHALL* *VEST* in such Lieutenant Governor, or such
other person or persons, *UNTIL* *HE* *OR* *THEY* *SHALL* *HAVE* *TAKEN*
*THE* *OATHS* *APPOINTED* to be taken by the Governor General of Our
said Commonwealth, and in the manner provided by the Instructions
accompanying these Our Letters Patent.
Their openings (affect) the winds and the spirit of the dew (that is)
when the twelve wide openings are opened in the sky, in the extreme ends
of the earth, through which (also) the sun, the moon, the stars, and all
the (other) heavenly objects come out in the west. There are many open
windows to the left and the right, but one window produces the heat at
its designated time in the manner of those openings through which the
stars rise in accordance with their orders and set according to their
numbers. I also saw chariots in heaven running in the universe above
those openings in which the stars that do not set revolve. One
(circuit) is larger than the rest of them all, and it circles the entire
cosmos at the extreme ends of the earth." [1 Enoch 75:2-9]
As the Chinese DAOist equivalent of the generalised and inclusive term
#28 - Chariot (軫 - Zhěn) which apples to a total number of the lunar
twenty-eight mansions associated within the Chinese constellations and
which can be understood within Jewish Kabbalistic consciousness as an
allusion to the Biblical text: "There is none like the God of Israel
[ALT KJV: God of Jeshurun {upright}, who rideth upon the heaven in thy
help, and in his excellency on the sky. (v 26)] who made the Glory of
his Shekinah dwell in the heavens and his majesty in the clouds.
A dwelling place is the Glory go the Shekinah of God, from the
beginning; beneath the arm of whose might the tribes of the children of
Israel are led. He shall drive out your enemies before you and he
commanded in his Memra to blot them out. And Israel dwelt in safety
alone, in accordance with with blessings with which Jacob their father
blessed them, in a land producing grain and wine. The heavens which are
above them will also make dews and rains descend upon them.
Blessed are you Israel! Who is like you! A people whose redemption is
near from before the Lord, (who is) the shield of your help and the
protection of your armies and the container of your arms and the
strength of the exaltation of your hopes. And your enemies shall be
broken before you; and you, my people, children of Israel, shall tread
on the necks of their kings when you study the law and do the
commandments." [(c) 1997 The Order of Saint Benedict, Aramaic
Deuteronomy 33:26-29]
- CENTER – YELLOW DRAGON - Earth (黃龍):
The Yellow Emperor or Yellow Deity was conceived by a virgin mother,
Fubao, who became pregnant after seeing a yellow ray of light turning
around the Northern Dipper (in Chinese theology the principal symbol of
God). Twenty four months later the Yellow Emperor was born and was
associated to the colour yellow because it is the colour of the Earth
(Dì 地), the material substance, in which he incarnated.
The Yellow Emperor was said to have turned in the form of the Yellow
Dragon at the end of his life, to ascend to Heaven. Since the Chinese
consider him to be their ancestor, they sometimes refer to themselves as
"children of the dragon". This legend also contributed towards the use
of the Chinese dragon as a symbol of imperial power.
It was said that the white tiger (western mansions) would only appear
when the emperor ruled with absolute virtue, or if there was peace
throughout the world)
----------
THE LAWS OF NATURE: THE THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS
The phrase 'law of nature' appears to have begun to be used
systematically during the early eighteenth century. It is generally
agreed that the phrase reflects the widely-held notion, prevalent within
both orthodox Christianity and Deism, that the world was ordered by a
divine law-giver, who laid down the manner in which the creation should
behave. A 'law of nature' was thus held to be more than a descriptive
or summary of observation features of the world; it reflected a divine
decision that the world was intended to behave in this manner. With the
widespread secularisation of western culture, this general belief has
been eroded, both inside and outside the scientific community. The
phrase 'laws of nature' remained, nevertheless, although it has acquired
something of the status of a dead metaphor. It remains, however, a
concept with profound theological implication.
We may being by attempting to clarify what a 'law of nature' might be.
The term is used widely, and consequently with a degree of imprecision,
not least on account of the variety of nuanced meanings associated with
the word 'law'. It can be used to refer to universally true statements
of non-limited scope that embody only qualitative predicates. Examples
of this might include 'all metals conduct electricity' or 'at constant
pressure any gas expands with increasing temperature.' This approach to
a definition excludes what might be termed 'accidental laws,' such as
'all the animals in my garden the afternoon are cats,' or "vacuously
true generalizations," such as "all solid gold spheres are less than ten
meters in diameter," or "all unicorns weigh five kilograms" (Ayers 1956;
Carroll 1990, 191-2).
The general consensus on the nature and scope of the "laws of nature"
within the scientific community has been set out by Davies (Davies 1992,
72-92). In general terms, the "laws of nature" can be considered to
have to following features.
1) They are universal. The laws of physics are assumed to be valid at
every place and every time. They are held "to apply unfailingly
everywhere in the universe and at all epochs of cosmic history" (Davies
1992, 82). There is an interesting parallel here with the criterion
introduced in the century by Vincent of Lérins for Christian doctrines,
which were required to be things which were believed "everywhere, always
and by all (quod ubique, quod temper, quod ab omnibus creditum est)."
2) They are absolute -- that is to say, that they do not depend on the
nature of the observer (for example, his or her social status, gender,
or sexual orientation). The state of a system may change over time, and
be related to a series of contingent and circumstantial considerations;
the laws, which provide correlation between those states at various
moments, do not change with time. This aspect of the laws of nature
causes serious difficulties for a postmodern worldview, which we shall
examine in a later section of this project.
3) They are eternal, in that they are held to be grounded in the
mathematical structures which are used to represent the physical world.
The remarkable correlation between what we shall loosely term
"mathematical reality" and the observed physical world is of
considerable significance, and we shall return to this matter later. It
is of considerable importance in this context to note that all known
fundamental laws are mathematical in form.
4) They are omnipotent, in that nothing can he held to he outside their
scope.
It will not have escaped the reader’s notice that these attributes which
are, by common agreement and convention, applied to the "laws of
nature", show remarkable affinities with those which are traditionally
applied to God in theistic religious systems, such as Christianity.
Davies' analysis thus raises the question of the relation between God
and the 'last of nature', to which we now turn.
GOD AND THE LAWS OF NATURE
We may take as our Starting point a statement of Davies, who argues that
God cannot “be omnipotent, for he could not act outside the laws of
nature" (Davies 1984, 209). This, however, fails to take account of a
fundamental debate within both Christian theology and the philosophy of
religion, focussing on the question of the power of God (Oakley 1984;
van den Brink 1993; Moonan I994). In what follows, we shall explore this
major discussion, and indicate its relevance to the relation of God and
the laws of nature.
How can God act absolutely reliably, without being subject to some
external agency which compels God to act in this way? This question was
debated with some heat at Paris in the thirteenth century, in response
to a form of determism linked with the writer Averroes. For Averroes,
the reliability of God ultimately rested upon external pressures. God
was compelled to act in certain ways -- and thus acted reliably. This
approach was, however, regarded with intense suspicion by most
theologians, who saw it as a crude denial of the freedom of God. But how
could God be Said to act reliably, unless it was through external
compulsion?
In what follows, we shall consider the answer given during the
thirteenth and fourteenth centuries by writers such as Duns Scotus and
William of Ockham. The fundamental principle which is stated by these
writers is that the reliability of God is ultimately grounded in the
divine nature itself. God does not act reliably because someone or
something makes God act in this way, but because of a deliberate and
free divine decision to act like this. This decision was not a result of
coercion or external constraint, but a free decision reflecting the
nature of God himself.
In his discussion of the opening line of the Apostle’s Creed -- “I
believe in God the Father almighty” -- Ockham asks precisely what is
meant by the word “almighty (omnipotens).” It cannot, he argues, mean
that God is presently able to do anything and everything; rather, it
means that God was once free to act in this way. God has now
established an order of things which reflects a loving and righteous
divine will -- and that order, once established, will remain until the
end of time.
Ockham uses two terms to refer to these different options. The “absolute
power of God (potentia Dei absoluta)” refers to the theoretical
possibilities prior to commitment to any course of action or world
ordering. The “ordained power of God (potentia Dei ordinata)" refers to
the way things now are, which reflects the order established by God their
creator. These do not represent two different sets of options now open
to God. They represent two different moments in the great history of
salvation. And our concern is with the ordained power of God, the way in
which God orders the creation at present.
The distinction is important, yet difficult. In view of this, we shall
explore it in a little more detail. Ockham is inviting us to consider
two very different situations in which we might speak of the
“omnipotence of God." The first is this: God is confronted with a whole
array of possibilities -- such as creating the world, or not creating
the world. God can choose to actualize any of these possibilities. This
is the absolute power of God, which refers to a situation in which God
has not yet acted. (It should be noted that, for the sake of clarity of
explanation of this specific issue, we have disregarded the question of
whether God be said to “create time” or “create within time.” This is an
immensely important debate, which cannot be considered fully at this
point).
We now move away from this scenario, in which we were invited to
consider a range of possibilities which God had the potential to enact.
We now consider the scenario in which God acts -- for example, by
ordering the universe. God has chosen some options, and brought them
into being, with the result that certain potentialities are now
actualities. We are now in the realm of the ordained power of God -- a
realm in which God's power is restricted, by virtue of God's own
decision. Ockham's point is that by choosing to actualize some
potentialities, God has implicitly chosen not to actualize others.
Choosing to do something means choosing not to do something else. Once
God has chosen to create the world, the option of not creating the World
is set to one side. This means that there are certain things which God
could do once that can no longer be done. Although God could have
decided not to create the world, God has now deliberately rejected that
possibility. And that rejection means that this possibility is no longer
open.
This leads to what seems, at first sight, to be a paradoxical situation.
On account of the divine omnipotence, God is not now able to do
everything. By exercising the divine power, God has limited options. For
Ockham, God cannot now do everything. God has deliberately limited the
possibilities. God chose to limit the options which are now open. Is
that a contradiction? No. If God is really capable of doing anything,
then God must be able to become committed to a course of action -- and
stay committed to it. God can thus be said to act according to
established laws — but these are not laws which somehow have their to
origination outside God, or which can be thought of as contrary to the
nature of God. They themselves are the creation of God, and reflect the
nature and character. In acting according to established laws, God is
remaining faithful to an expression of his own nature, brought about by
his own free decision. Ockham expresses this as follows (Ockham 1966,
vol. 9, 585-6):
'God is able to do some things by his ordained power (de potentia
ordinata) and others by his absolute power (de potentia absoluta). This
distinction should not be understood to mean that there are actually in
God too powers, one of which is “ordained” and the other of which is
“absolute,” because there is only one power of God directed towards the
external world, the exercise of which is in all respects God himself.
Nor should this be understood to mean that God can do some things by his
ordained power, and others by his absolute, not his ordained, power, in
that God does nothing without having first ordained it. But it should be
understood in this way: God can do something in a manner which is
established by laws which were ordained and established by God. In this
respect, God acts according to his ordained power."
The relevance of this analysis to Davies’ statement will be clear.
Within a theistic perspective, such as that offered by Christianity, it
is quite misleading to posit a tension between God and the laws of
nature, as if the latter were somehow independent of the former, or in
some way contradicted each other. We could thus say that the absolute
power of God refers to t = 0, whereas the ordained power of God refers
to t > 0. The Christian will hold that God’s nature is somehow
expressed and embodied in the ordering of the world, which underlies the
laws of nature. That God “obeys” such laws cannot conceivably be taken
to mean that God is subservient to another being, or is obligated or
otherwise Constrained to work within an alien framework which is not of
his own making. There is a fundamental line of continuity between the
creator, the regularity of the creation, and the human perception and
expression of this regularity in the form of “laws of nature.”
PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACHES TO THE LAWS OF NATURE
Three somewhat different approaches to the “laws of nature" have been
set out in recent studies exploring the more philosophical aspects of
the matter. In the first place, there is continued support for the
Humean approach, which discerns regularity in the ordering process of
the human mind, rather than any independently-existing natural ordering
(Urbach 1988). For such writers, “laws of nature” merely record actual
or de facto regularities. Since there is no necessity in nature, the
“laws” in question can only describe what is observed, and nothing more
Observation may thus be regarded as a process which aims to impose order
on the extra-mental world. This kind of approach can be found in the
writings of Ernst Mach (Mach 1898):
"The communication of scientific knowledge always involves description,
that is, mimetic {ie.
Nous: #73
Time: 19:55 hrs
Date: 2017.1.19
Torah: #40 #90 #200 %81 = #6
Dao: Employing Deeming, Daring to Act
Tetra: #7 - Ascent
I-Ching: H46 - Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending
Latin: Gloria {God who comforts the oppressed} Alt: Menkel {Cease Strife
Before God] {
1. HELPS HEAL THE ILLS OF THE SPIRIT, RELEASES FROM PERSECUTORS
2. MEN OF VIRTUE
3. FAITHFULNESS, INDUCES OBEDIENCE IN SUBORDINATES
4. Homoth
}
Jesus {He is saved/A savior; a deliverer} of Nazareth {Sovereign; one
chosen or set apart; separated; crowned; sanctified}; #15 CE
- http://www.grapple369.com?zen:4,row:8,col:6,nous:73
ASSOCIATED TO THE 4TH JURISPRUDENT/CHRONOLOGICAL (Hebrew Kabbalah Magic
Square) PLANE AS {Nature amended in its Nature}
With Ascent (#7 as {#3, #20, #52, #73 *** , #79, #1, #16, #35, #7}),
high ambitions.
With Sinking (#64 as {#21, #9, #25, #76, #47, #76, #49, #69, #64}), low
ambitions.
***@zen: 4, row: 8, col: 6, nous: 73 [Super: #373 / #71 - Know-How
as a Disease, Disease of Knowledge; I-Ching: H38 - Contrariety,
Opposition, Polarising, Perversion; Tetra: 6 - Contrariety, Ego: #325 /
#73 - Employing Deeming, Daring to Act; I-Ching: H46 - Climbing,
Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 7 - Ascent]
SUPER MALE IDEA: #373 has 10 Categories:
#3, #70, #300 = Ga`ash (H1608): 1) a mountain of Ephraim where Joshua
was buried; #20, #40, #200, #100, #8, #5 = merqachah (H4841): 1) a
seasoning, compounding, spice-seasoning; 2) ointment pot; #10, #300, #8,
#50, #5 = shachah (H7812): 1) to bow down; 1a) (Qal) to bow down; 1b)
(Hiphil) to depress (fig); 1c) (Hithpael); 1c1) to bow down, prostrate
oneself; 1c1a) before superior in homage; 1c1b) before God in worship;
1c1c) before false gods; 1c1d) before angel; #1, #80, #70, #80, #30, #1,
#50, #1, #10, #50 = apoplanao (G635): 1) to cause to go astray; 2) to
lead away from the truth to error; 3) to go astray, stray away from; #1,
#100, #10, #40, #1, #9, #1, #10, #1, #200 = Arimathaia (G707): 1) the
name of several cities in Palestine The one mentioned in Mat. 27:57, Mk
15:43, Lk. 23:51, Jn 19:38 appears to have been the same as the
birthplace of Samuel in Mount Ephraim.; #2, #1, #100, #70, #200 = baros
(G922): 1) heaviness, weight, burden, trouble For Synonyms see entry
5819; #5, #3, #5, #100, #200, #10, #50 = egersis (G1454): 1) a rousing,
excitation; 2) a rising up; 3) resurrection from the dead;
#80, #1, #100, #8, #3, #70, #100, #10, #1 = paregoria (G3931): 1)
*ADDRESSING*, *ADDRESS*; 1a) *EXHORTATION*; 1b) *COMFORT*, *SOLACE*,
*RELIEF*, *ALLEVIATION*, *CONSOLATION*;
#200, #1, #100, #3, #1, #50, #8, #10 = sargane (G4553): 1) a braided
rope, a band; 2) a basket, a basket made of ropes, a hamper; #200, #10,
#4, #8, #100, #1, #50 = sidereos (G4603): 1) made of iron;
EGO (FEMALE) IDEA: #325 has 21 Categories:
#30, #1, #4, #200, #40, #30, #20 = 'Adrammelek (H152): 1) an idol or god
of the Sepharvites, introduced to Israel by Shalmaneser the fifth; 2)
the son and murderer of Sennacherib; #20, #4, #300, #1 = deshe' (H1877):
1) grass, new grass, green herb, vegetation, young; #10, #9, #6, #300 =
tuws (H2907): 1) (Qal) to dart, flutter, rush; #5, #40, #30, #100, #100,
#10, #40 = laqaq (H3952): 1) to lap, lick, lap up; 1a) (Qal) to lap, lap
up; 1b) (Piel) to lap up;
#30, #5, #20, #10, #200, #50, #10 = nakar (H5234): 1) to recognise,
acknowledge, know, respect, discern, regard; 2) to act or treat as
foreign or strange, disguise, misconstrue; 1a) (Niphal) to be
recognised; 1b) (Piel) to regard; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to regard, observe,
pay attention to, pay regard to, notice; 1c2) to recognise (as formerly
known), perceive; 1c3) to be willing to recognise or acknowledge,
acknowledge with honour; 1c4) to be acquainted with; 1c5) to
distinguish, understand; 1d) (Hithpael) to make oneself known; 2a)
(Niphal) to disguise oneself; 2b) (Piel); 2b1) to treat as foreign
(profane); 2b2) to misconstrue; 2c) (Hithpael); 2c1) to act as alien;
2c2) to disguise oneself;
#5, #60, #10, #200, #10, #40 = ciyr (H5518): 1) pot; 2) thorn, hook,
brier; 1a) pot (household utensil); 1b) pot (of temple); 2a) thorns; 2b)
hooks; #200, #70, #40, #10, #5 = Ra`amyah` (H7485): 1) one who returned
from exile with Zerubbabel; 1a) also 'Reelaiah'; #6, #300, #5, #4, #10 =
sahed (H7717): 1) witness; #6, #300, #6, #8, #5 = shuwchah (H7745): 1)
pit; #6, #300, #9, #10 = suwt (H7750): 1) to swerve, fall away; 1a)
(Qal); 1a1) to swerve, fall away; 1a2) those falling away (participle);
#1, #3, #1, #40, #70, #10, #200 = agamos (G22): 1) unmarried, unwedded,
single;
#4, #10, #1, #40, #5, #50, #5, #10, #200 = diameno (G1265): 1) to stay
permanently, remain permanently, continue;
#5, #50, #70, #200 = heis (G1520): 1) *ONE*;
#5, #30, #20, #70, #200 = helkos (G1668): 1) a wound, esp. a wound
producing a discharge pus; 2) a sore, an ulcer; #5, #40, #70, #10, #200
= emos (G1699): 1) my, mine, etc.; #9, #1, #100, #200, #5, #10 = tharseo
(G2293): 1) to be of good courage, be of good cheer; #20, #30, #5, #70,
#200 = kleos (G2811): 1) rumour, report; 2) glory, praise;
#40, #10, #40, #5, #10, #200, #9, #1, #10 = mimeomai (G3401): 1) *TO*
*IMITATE*: *ANY* *ONE*;
#50, #5, #70, #200 = neos (G3501): 1) recently born, young, youthful; 2)
new;
#70, #10, #70, #40, #5, #50, #70, #10 = oiomai (G3633): 1) *TO*
*SUPPOSE*, *THINK*;
#100, #10, #7, #8, #200 = rhiza (G4491): 1) a root; 2) that which like a
root springs from a root, a sprout, shoot; 3) metaph. offspring, progeny;
ASSOCIATED TO THE 4TH #369 as JURISPRUDENT/CHRONOLOGICAL (Hebrew
Kabbalah Magic Square) PLANE AS (Nature amended in its Nature)
} reproduction of facts in thought, the object of which is to replace
and save the trouble of new experience. Again, to save the labour of
instruction and acquisition, concise abridged description is sought.
This is really all that natural laws are."
For Mach, the “laws of nature" arc thus nothing more than “concise
abridged descriptions” of reality, a convenient and helpful manner of
depicting reality which has no ontological significance. They are purely
heuristic in character, and cannot be held to correspond to anything
that exists independent of the mind of the observer.
Other writers adopt a viewpoint which is more sympathetic to a realist
interpretation. David Lewis may be regarded as developing some insights
John Stuart Mill, who argued that the question about “laws of nature”
may be reduced to the simpler question: “What are the fewest and
simplest assumptions, which being granted, the whole existing order of
nature would result?" (Mill 1974, vol. 7, 317). Lewis suggests that “a
contingent generalization is a law of nature if and only if it appears
as a theorem or (axiom) in each of the true deductive systems that
achieves a best combination of simplicity and strength" (Lewis 1973,
73). A “law of nature” is thus understood to be a contingent
generalization which possesses an appropriate balance of “simplicity"
and “strength", which can be formulated in a propositional manner
allowing it to function within a deductive system. As Lewis himself
later acknowledged, this seems to introduce a significant degree of
subjectivity into the definition of such a law, in that the “best
combination of simplicity and strength” is left to the judgment of the
observer. The distinction between what is a genuine law of nature and
what is simply an accidental regularity thus remains unclear.
A third approach argues that the laws of nature are to be thought of as
relations between universals (Dretske 1977; Tooley l977; Armstrong
1983). These laws of nature arc assumed to exist independently of the
human minds which attempt to discern them. Armstrong draws a fundamental
distinction between “laws of nature" and “law-statements” (Armstrong
1983, 8). A law of nature is thus a feature of the real world; a
law-statement is a human creation which attempts to express these
features. Regularities reflect the way in which certain universals stand
in a relation of “nomic necessitation” (Lange 1992, 154-5). For
Armstrong, a statement p (a “law-statement") affirms a cosmic uniformity
(“a law of nature") if (i) p is universally quantified; (ii) p is true;
(iii) p is contingent; and (iv) p contains only non-local empirical
predicates (apart from logical connectives and quantifiers) (Armstrong
I983, 12). This allows Armstrong to affirm fundamental ordering in
nature, while maintaining the provisionality of human attempts to
express and articulate such regularities.
It is beyond the scope of this work to enter into this debate, although
we shall be considering the merits of a realist approach in due course.
The Humean suggestion that “laws of nature” are imposed on nature is
widely regarded as implausible within the scientific community.
Regularity, according to this viewpoint, is not to be seen as a feature
of the “real World,” but as a construct of an order-imposing human mind.
It is widely-held within the scientific community that regularity
(including statistical regularity) is an intrinsic feature of the world,
uncovered (not imposed) by human investigation. For example, consider
the comments of Paul Davies, which would be widely endorsed by natural
scientists (Davies l992, 8Z—3):
It is important to understand that the regularities of nature are real .
. . I believe any suggestion that the laws of nature are similar
projections of the human mind is absurd. The existence of regularities
in nature is an objective mathematical fact. On the other hand, the
statements called laws that are found in textbooks clearly are human
inventions, but inventions designed to reflect, albeit imperfectly,
actually existing properties of nature. Without this assumption that
regularities are real, science is reduced to an absurdity. Another
reason why I don’t I think the laws of nature are simply made up by us
is that they help us to uncover new things about the world, sometimes
things we never suspected. The mark of a powerful law is that it goes
beyond a faithful description of the original phenomenon it was invoked
to explain, and links up with other phenomena too . . . The history of
science shows that, once a new law is accepted, its consequences are
rapidly worked out, and the law is tested in many novel contexts, often
leading to the discovery of new, unexpected and important phenomena.
This leads me to believe that in conducting science we are uncovering
real regularities and linkages out of nature, not writing them into nature.
It will be clear that a religious (and especially a Christian) approach
to the debate will focus on the idea of the ordering of the world as
something which exists in that world, independent of whether the human
mind recognizes it or not, and that this ordering can be understood to
be related to the doctrine of creation. While many natural scientists
have discarded the original theological framework which led their
predecessors of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries to speak of
“laws of nature,” there is no reason why such an insight should not be
re-appropriated by those natural scientists sensitive to the religious
aspects of their work.
Recent studies of the “laws of nature” have stressed their role in
reflecting ,and conceptualizing order (Harre 1993; Carroll 1994). This
"ordering” can be discerned at several levels, including the general
principles which appear to govern the universe and the classification
systems or “taxonomies” which play such an important role in laying the
foundations for the exploration of the laws of nature (Harte 1993,
10-11). In view of the importance of such taxonomies, we shall explore
their role in the thought of a leading botanist, noting especially the
theological aspects of the matter.
THE ANALYSIS OF ORDER: THE CASE OF LINNAEUS
One of the most significant interpretations of the observation of
ordering within the natural world is due to the eighteenth-century
Swedish naturalist Carl von Linne (1707-78), more generally known by the
Latinised form of his name, "Carolus Linnaeus" (Anderson 1997). Despite
the muddled account of his significance offered by some English
theologians (most notably, that found in Raven 1953, vol. 1, 152-8), it
is clear that Linnaeus is an important witness to a potentially creative
and illuminating mode of interaction between theological beliefs and
empirical analysis. It is widely agreed that Linnaeus’ starting point
is his perception of some form of ordering within the natural world.
Linnaeus was not really an “experimentalist", as that term is now
understood; for him, an “experiment” referred primarily to the
observation or experience of the natural world (Broberg 1975, 38).
Linnaeus brought to his taxonomical task an acute ability for accurate
observation and logical analysis, allowing him to categorize and
classify what might otherwise not be recognized as possessing any form
of regularity.
So how is this ordering to be explained? Although Linnaeus was somewhat
unorthodox by the norms of contemporary Swedish Lutheranism (Frangsmyr
1969, 216-17; Broberg 1975, 141-9), there is no doubt that a strongly
religious belief system, particularly in relation to a doctrine of
creation, informs his analysis of nature. Indeed, it is significant to
observe the form of argumentation deployed in the 1743 essay “Oratio de
telluris habitabilis incremento.” Linnaeus does not make an appeal to
the Christian doctrine of creation in establishing his argument; rather,
he considers that doctrine to be confirmed and strengthened by his
arguments concerning the relation of plants and animals (von Hoftsen
1938, 35). Linnaeus regards the world as being much older than a purely
literal reading of the Genesis creation account would suggest (Frangsmyr
1969, 223-5); his concern, however, does not focus on issues of
chronology, but rather the perception of ordering within nature, which
Linnaeus believes to rest upon, or somehow reflect, the divine creation
of the world. Indeed, it has been persuasively argued that the
perception and explanation of order within nature is the most single
important question to be addressed by Linnaeus (Larson 1971).
Linnaeus’ taxonomic system is grounded in the assumption that creation
is fixed and rational. As it happened, the first of these assumptions
would be challenged in the subsequent generation, with the rise of
evolutionary thinking (Larson 1994). Nevertheless, the time-scale
envisaged for the evolutionary process was so enormous that a mere human
life-span was insignificant in comparison. In effect, Linnaeus’
assumption of fixity proved to be adequate for his specific purposes. It
may be noted that this assumption of an orderly world, capable of
rational investigation through acute observation and logical
categorization, resonates with both the Christian doctrine of creation
and the Enlightenment belief in the harmony and rationality of the world.
Linnaeus’ views on the origins of the order he perceived were soon
subjected to criticism, most notably by George-Louis Leclere, Comte de
Buffon (Sloan 1976). Our particular interest, however, concerns the
importance of the observations of regularity within nature, and the
perceived consistency of such ordering with a Christian doctrine of
creation. At some times in history, the religious significance of this
regularity might be construed in a highly pragmatic manner, as with
Gregory of Tours in the seventh century, who noted the value of
astronomy in determining the correct times for monastic prayers
(McCluskey 1990); at others, this regularity was interpreted in more
theological terms, as the divine imposition of order on the world. Many
other such examples could be given, in which the perception of ordering
and regularity is of foundational importance to scientific advance.
Nevertheless, it must be appreciated that the perception of ordering can
also lead to difficulties for a religious perspective, as will become
clear in what follows.
ORDERING AND MECHANISM: FROM NEWTON TO PALEY
It is a simple matter of historical fact that the relationship between
“natural theology” and the “natural sciences” has been remarkably
ambivalent in terms of its intentions and outcomes. One the one hand, a
strategy originally devised by religious writers to heighten the
awareness of a religious dimension to nature ended up offering new
opportunities for a purely secular interpretation of the world; on the
other, one intended to accentuate a purely naturalistic interpretation
of the world has proved remarkably amenable to a religious position
(Brooke 1989). Nevertheless, it can be shown without difficulty that one
of the most distinctive features of British intellectual life from the
late seventeenth to the late nineteenth centuries was a pervasive belief
that science was allied to the cause of religion.
The origins of this trend are generally agreed to lie particularly with
the use made of Newton’s Principia by the Anglican apologists of the
late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries (Metzger 1938; Jacob
1976; Jacob and Jacob 1980). The factors which led to this development
are not fully understood, although there is agreement that they probably
include the following (Gascoigne 1988, 222-4):
1) A focus on natural theology led to public interest in the
interpretation of the natural world, rather than the more controversial
matter of the interpretation of the Bible (see further below) or matters
of doctrinal disagreement between various church groupings or
theological schools.
2) The nature of ecclesiastic politics in England following the
post—1688 constitution favoured that section of the Church of England
which placed an emphasis on the role of reason, rather than those which
stressed the transcendental character of divine revelation (Jacob 1976).
3) The Newtonian concept of gravity, interpreted within a theological
framework which stressed the operation of divine providence, seemed to
offer a means by which divine involvement in the World could be
maintained without lapsing into monism or dualism.
Yet it was not long before what had seemed to be a promising alliance
between science and religion led to a growing and potentially
irreversible estrangement (Odom 1966). The Newtonian system seemed to
many to suggest that the world was a self-sustaining mechanism which had
no need for divine governance or sustenance for its day-to-day
operation. By the end of the eighteenth century, it seemed to many that
Newton's system actually led to atheism or agnosticism, rather than to
faith. This can be seen reflected both in Laplace’s Treatise of
Celestial Mechanics, which effectively eliminated the need for God
(either as explanatory hypothesis or as active sustainer) in cosmology
(Odom 1966; Hahn 1981), and in the writings of the poet William Blake,
in which the Newtonian worldview is occasionally equated with Satan
(Ault l974). Percy Bysshe Shelley famously remarked that “the consistent
Newtonian is necessarily an atheist,” while Samuel Taylor Coleridge
conceded that Newton's general approach obviated the need for God (Force
1985, 155; Gascoigne 1988, 234).
Yet the rise of a mechanistic view of the world offered another approach
to natural theology, which was seized upon by some of the leading
apologists of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century (Bennett
1986). The metaphor of the universe as clockwork had already been
deployed before the advent of its most famous exponent (Mayr 1986);
nevertheless, it was in the writings of William Paley that it found its
most celebrated presentation (Clarke 1974; LeMahieu 1976; Gillespie
1990). For Paley, the Newtonian image of the world as a mechanism
immediately suggested the metaphor of a clock or watch, raising the
question of who constructed the intricate mechanism which was so
evidently displayed in the functioning of the world. Although it is
currently fashionable to deride Paley’s natural theology, this generally
rests on a failure to recognize how he managed to transform the
“clockwork” metaphor from an icon of scepticism and atheism to an
apologetic affirmation of the existence of God. As Mayr has
demonstrated, the English tradition of natural theology had, up to this
point, shied away from an appeal to mechanism, apparently for fear of
its philosophical implications (Mayr 1986, 9O~lUl). Paley saw an
apologetic opening, and seized it.
One of Paley’s most significant arguments is that mechanism implies
contrivance. Writing against the backdrop of the emerging Industrial
Revolution, Paley sought to exploit the apologetic potential of the
growing interest in machinery -- such as “watches, telescopes,
stocking-mills, and steam engines" -- within England’s literate classes
(Gillespie 1990, 216-17). For some, the mechanistic model of the
universe implied a lifeless deity (famously derided by Blake as
“Nonbodaddy”). For Paley, the model offered a new defense of the
existence of God.
The general thrust of this defense is well known, Noting the
proliferation of machinery in the England of his time, Paley argues that
only someone who is mad would suggest that such complex mechanical
technology came into being by purposeless chance. Mechanism presupposes
contrivance -- that is to say, a sense of purpose and an ability to
design and fabricate. Both the human body in particular, and the world
in general, could be seen as mechanisms which had been designed and
constructed in such a manner as to achieve harmony of both means and
ends. It must be stressed that Paley is not suggesting that there
exists an analogy between human mechanical devices and nature. The
force of his argument rests on an identity: nature is a mechanism, and
hence was possessed of an intelligent design (Gillespie 1990, 722-7).
In the end, Paley's defence of divine design may be Judged to have
failed, partly on account of the rise of Darwinism in the second part of
the nineteenth century. It is, nevertheless, an interesting episode in
natural theology, which cannot be seen simply as part of the traditional
cosmological argument (which antedated the mechanical revolution) nor
traditional natural theology (which focused ‘on natural history,
following a pattern established by John Ray in his classic Wisdom of God
Manifested in the Works of Creation (1691)). It also illustrates the
manner in which “order” and “mechanism” were seen as closely related,
for theological reasons." [The Quest For Order, The Foundations of
Dialogue In Science & Religion, Alister E. McGrath, p 59-69]
----
*** TO BE CONTINUED ***
A REVISION OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED AS A PDF DOCUMENT FROM THIS URL:
- https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzRmc7Bm7indalJMM055YUxLams
Initial Post: 1 May 2017
--
#5 + #6 {OPINION} = #11: Say NO to anonymous fascist propaganda every time.
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[IOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY.”
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[IOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE.
- http://www.grapple369.com
THUS I ASK, IS A MACHINE ABLE TO POSSESS A MORAL CONTEXT TO ITS
ACTUALITY AND WHICH IS CAPABLE OF LOVE TOWARDS MAN?
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS."